ZelizerV. A., The Purchase of Intimacy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007); RadinM. J., “Market Inalienability,”Harvard Law Review100, no.8 (1987): 1849–1937; CohenI. G., “Note, The Price of Everything, the Value of Nothing: Reframing the Commodification Debate,”Harvard Law Review117, no.2 (2003): 689–710.
2.
MadeiraJ. L., “Conceiving of Products and the Products of Conception: Reflections on Commodification, Consumption, ART, and Abortion,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics42, no. 3 (2015): 293–306.
3.
Id.
4.
Id.
5.
Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992, Pub. L. No. 102–493, 106 Stat. 3146 (codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 263a-1 to −7); Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, “Assisted Reproductive Technology,”available at <http://www.cdc.gov/ART> (last visited April 13, 2015).
6.
MadisonK., “Regulating Health Care Quality in an Information Age,”U.C. Davis Law Review40, no. 5 (2007): 1577–1654; CutlerD. M., “The Role of Information in Medical Markets: An Analysis of Publicly Reported Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery,”American Economic Review94, no.2 (2004): 342–346.
7.
For one first person narrative of this kind of experience, see BartholetE., Family Bonds: Adoption, Infertility, and the New World of Child Production (Boston: Beacon Press1999).
8.
FoxD., “Note, Racial Classification in Assisted Reproduction,”Yale Law Journal118, no. 8 (2009): 1844–1893, at 1849–1853.
9.
ErtmanM. M., “What's Wrong with a Parethood Market? A New and Improved Theory of Commodification,”North Carolina Law Review82, no. 1 (2003): 1–57, at 28–29.
10.
CahnN., “The New Kinship,”Georgetown Law Review100, no. 2 (2012): 367–429, at 388–339.
11.
Compare Jhordan C. v. Mary K., 224 Cal. Rptr. 530 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986); In re RC, 775 P.2d 27 (Col. 1989) (finding sperm donor to be the father) with Ferguson v. McKiernan, 940 A.2d 1236 (Pa. 2007) (rejecting sperm donor fatherhood in face of agreement to the contrary)
12.
GarciaM. E., “In with New Families, Out with Bad Law: Determining the Rights of Known Sperm Donors through Intent-Based Written Agreements,”Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy21, no. 1 (2014): 197–225, at 202–204.
13.
UngerR. M., “The Critical Legal Studies Movement,”Harvard Law Review96, no.3 (1983): 561–674, at 622–623.
14.
CohenI. G., Patients with Passports: Medical Tourism, Law, and Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press2014); CohenI. G., “Circumvention Tourism,”Cornell Law Review97, no. 6 (2012): 1309–1398, at 1373–1386.
15.
Id. (Patients with Passports).
16.
CohenI. G., “Regulating the Organ Market: Normative Foundations for Market Regulation,”Law and Contemporary Problems77, no. 3 (2014): 71–100.
17.
AlmelingR., “Gender and the Value of Bodily Goods: Commodification in Egg and Sperm Donation,”Law and Contemporary Problems72, no. 3 (Summer 2009): 37–58, at 45–56.