LiebJ. D.DavisI.EvansJ., “The UNC Comprehensive Individual Molecular Atlas Project,”The North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, Planning Grant (April 2010): (unpublished grant).
7.
PentzR. D., “Ethics Guidelines for Research with the Recently Dead,”Nature Medicine11, no. 11 (2005): 1145–1149;.
8.
see Wicclair, supra note 1.
9.
U.S. National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006), Section 11(d).
10.
MooreW., The Knife Man: The Extraordinary Life and Times of John Hunter, Father of Modern Surgery (New York: Roadway, 2005).
11.
CantorN. L., After We Die: The Life and Times of the Human Cadaver (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2010);.
12.
RoachM., Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2004).
13.
TilneyN. L., Transplant, from Myth to Reality (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003): At 46–48.
14.
U.S. National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (1968), Section 3.
15.
U.S. National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, Uniform Determination of Death Act (1980).
16.
BurkleC. M., “Brain Death and the Courts,”Neurology76, no. 9 (2011): 837–841.
17.
U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Part 46, Subpart A, Section 102(f).
18.
StrongC., “Specified Principlism: What It Is, and Does It Really Resolve Cases Better Than Casuistry?”Journal of Medicine and Philosophy25, no. 3 (2000): 323–341.
19.
See McGuire, supra note 2.
20.
SchmidtH.CallierS., “How Anonymous Is ‘Anonymous’? Some Suggestions Towards a Coherent Universal Coding System for Genetic Samples,”Journal of Medical Ethics38, no. 5 (2012): 304–309;.
21.
ImH. K., “On Sharing Quantitative Trait GWAS Results in an Era of Multiple-Omics Data and the Limits of Genomic Privacy,”American Journal of Human Genetics90, no. 4 (2012): 591–598.
22.
See Pentz, supra note 7;.
23.
Wicclair, supra note 1;.
24.
McGuire, supra note 2.
25.
U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Part 46, Subpart D.
26.
The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, “The Belmont Report,” April 18, 1979, available at <http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html>(last visited April 14, 2014);.
27.
WendlerD.PrasadK., “Core Safeguards for Clinical Research with Adults Who Are Unable to Consent,”Annals of Internal Medicine135, no. 7 (2001): 514–523;.
U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, 164.512(i)(1)(iii).
30.
ClaytonE. W., “Informed Consent for Genetic Research on Stored Tissue Samples,”Journal of the American Medical Association274, no. 22 (1995): 1786–1792.
31.
National Institutes of Health, National Human Genome Research Institute, “The Genotype-Tissue Expression Project: Organ and Tissue Donors FAQ,” August 12, 2012, available at <http://www.genome.gov/27549431>(last visited April 24, 2014).
32.
National Institutes of Health, Office of Strategic Coordination – the Common Fund, “The Genotype-Tissue Expression Project, Updated Informational Brochure,”2012, available at http://commonfund.nih.gov/sites/default/files/GTEx_trifold_final_2012.pdf> (last visited April 24, 2014) (emphasis added).
33.
BergJ., “Grave Secrets: Legal and Ethical Analysis of Postmortem Confidentiality,”Connecticut Law Review34, no. 1 (2001): 81–122.
FeinbergJ., “Harm to Others,” in Harm to Others (Oxford University Press, 1984): At 79–95;.
37.
FeinbergJ., “Harm to Others,” in Harm to Others (Oxford University Press, 1984): At 79–95;.
38.
PitcherG., “The Misfortunes of the Dead,” in American Philosophical Quarterly21, no. 2 (1984): 217–225.
39.
U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Part 46, Subpart A.
40.
Personal communication between the U.S. Office for Human Research Protections and Daniel NelsonK., Director of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Office of Human Research Ethics (August 17, 2012).
41.
U.S. Office for Human Research Protections, “Guidance on Research Involving Coded Private Information or Biological Specimens,”2004, revised 2008, available at <http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/cdebiol.html>(last visited May 6, 2014).
42.
Department of Health and Human Services, “Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 45 CFR Parts 46, 160, and 164,”Federal Register76, no. 143 (July 26, 2011).
43.
Personal communication between the U.S. Office for Human Research Protections and Daniel NelsonK., Director of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Office of Human Research Ethics (August 17, 2012).
44.
HalperinE. C., “The Poor, the Black, and the Marginalized as the Source of Cadavers in United States Anatomical Education,”Clinical Anatomy20, no. 5 (2007): 489–95.
45.
SklootR., The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks (New York: Broadway Paperbacks, 2011).
46.
U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Part 46, Subpart A.
UK Legislature, Human Tissue Act (2004), Part 3, Provision 45.
49.
See Halperin, supra note 33, at 489.
50.
Id.
51.
RichardsonR., Death, Dissection and the Destitute (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001).
52.
National Institutes of Health, “Guidelines on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research,”Federal Register59, no. 46 (March 9, 1994): 11146–11151.
53.
National Institutes of Health, “Policy and Guidelines on the Inclusion of Children as Participants in Research Involving Human Subjects,” March 6, 1998, available at <http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98–024.html>(last visited April 24, 2014).
RoachM., The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers (New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 2003).
57.
TeresiD., The Undead: Organ Harvesting, the Ice-Water Test, Beating-Heart Cadavers – How Medicine Is Blurring the Line Between Life and Death (New York, Pantheon Books, 2012);.
58.
TeresiD., “What You Lose When You Sign That Donor Card,”Wall Street Journal, April 4, 2012;.
U.S. National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006), Section 8(a).
64.
U.S. National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006), Section 11(f).
65.
Couzin-FrankelJ., “Return of Unexpected DNA Results Urged,”Science339, no. 29 (March 2013): 1507–1508;.
66.
KnoppersB. M., “The Emergence of an Ethical Duty to Disclose Genetic Research Results: International Perspectives,”European Journal of Human Genetics14, no. 26 (July 2006): 1170–1178;.
ClaytonE. W., “Informed Consent and Biobanks,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics33, no. 1 (2005): 15–21.
71.
McGuireA. L.GibbsR. A., “No Longer De-Identified,”Science312, no. 5772 (2006): 370–371.
72.
GreelyH. T., “The Uneasy Ethical and Legal Underpinnings of Large-Scale Genomic Biobanks,”Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics8 (2007): 343–364;.
73.
HanssonM. G., “Should Donors Be Allowed to Give Broad Consent to Future Biobank Research?”The Lancet Oncology7, no. 3 (2006): 266–269;.
74.
CaulfieldT., “Biobanks and Blanket Consent: The Proper Place of the Public Good and Public Perception Rationales,”King's Law Journal18, no. 2 (2007): 209–226.
75.
National Institutes of Health, National Human Genome Research Institute, “The Genotype-Tissue Expression Project: Surgical Donors FAQ,” August 12, 2012, available at <http://www.genome.gov/27549432>(last visited April 24, 2014).
76.
WicclairM. R., “Informed Consent and Research Involving the Newly Dead,”Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal12, no. 4 (2002): 351–372.