RobertsS., Nowhere to Go, Patients Linger in Hospitals, at a High Cost, New York Times, January 3, 2012, at A18.
2.
VickeryK. D.SauserK., and DavisM. M., Policy Responses to Demand for Health Care Access: From the Individual to the Population, JAMA309, no. 7 (2013): 665–666. See also KocherR.EmanuelE. Z., and DeParleN. A., The Affordable Care Act and the Future of Clinical Medicine: The Opportunities and Challenges, Annals of Internal Medicine153, no. 8 (2010): 536–539. Over half the states are not moving forward with Medicaid expansion at this time. Kaiser Family Foundation, Status of State Action on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of September 30, 2013, available at <http://kff.org/health-reform/state-indicator/state-activity-around-expanding-medicaid-under-the-affordable-care-act> (last visited February 11, 2014).
3.
Some have argued that medical repatriation may be acceptable ethically as well as legally, but only if the patient gives full and informed consent. KuczewskiM. G., Who Is My Neighbor? A Communitarian Analysis of Access to Health Care for Immigrants, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics32, no. 4 (2011): 327–36. See also ParsiK.HossaN., Complex Discharges and Undocumented Patients: Growing Ethical Concerns, Journal of Clinical Ethics23, no. 4 (2012): 299–330; AgraharkarV., Deporting The Sick: Regulating International Patient Dumping by U.S. Hospitals, Columbia Human Rights Law Review41 (2010): 569–600.
Condition of Participation: Discharge Planning, in Hospital Conditions of Participation: Quality Assessment & Performance Improvement Final Rule (68 F.R. 3435); published January 24, 2003, effective March 25, 2004, as amended at 69 F.R. 49268, August 11, 2004; 42 C.F.R. §482.43 (2011); Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Revisions to State Operations Manual (SOM), Hospital Appendix A –Interpretive Guidelines for 42 C.F.R. 482.43, Discharge Planning, available at <http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-and-Certification/SurveyCertificationGenInfo/Downloads/Survey-and-Cert-Letter-13-32.pdf> (last visited February 11, 2014). See also AgraharkarV., Deporting The Sick: Regulating International Patient Dumping by U.S. Hospitals, Columbia Human Rights Law Review41 (2010): 569–600; SangermanJ. J.LevyJ. T., The Attorneys Role in the Hospital Discharge Planning Process for the Elderly, New York State Bar Association Journal65, no. 22 (1993); Montejo v. Martin Memorial Medical Center, 874 So.2d 654,657 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004); WintonR.DiMassaC. M.,L.A. Files Patient ‘Dumping Charges, Los Angeles Times, November 16, 2006, available at <http://articles.latimes.com/2006/nov/16/local/me-dumping16> (last visited February 11, 2014); ChipliA. J., Breathing Life into Discharge Planning, Elder Law Journal13, no. 1 (2005): 1–37; Cotera-Perez-PerezO., Discharge Planning in Acute Care and Long-term Facilities, Journal of Legal Medicine26, no. 1 (2005): 85–95.
6.
Wycoff Heights Medical Center v. Louis Rodriguez, 741 N.Y.S.2d 400 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2002).
SwidlerR. N.SeastrumT., and SheltonW., Difficult Hospital Inpatient Discharge Decisions: Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Practice Issues, American Journal of Bioethics7, no. 3 (2007): 23–28.
9.
See supra note 8. See also Agraharkar, supra note 3.
FasserC.McGuireA.ErdmanK.NadaldoD.ScottS., and WatersV., The Ethics Workup: A Case-Based Approach to Ethical Decision-Making Instruction, Journal of Physician Assistant Education18, no. 1 (2007): 34–41; see also Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Ethics Work-Up, September 1, 2011, available at <http://www.bcm.edu/ethics/?pmid=21192> (last visited February 11, 2014).
16.
See Swidler., supra note 8; ParsiHossa, supra note 3. See also PopeT. M.ArnoldR. M., and BarnatoA. E., Caring for the Seriously Ill: Cost and Public Policy, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics39, no. 2 (2011): 111–113.
17.
See, e.g., ParsiHossa supra note 3; see, e.g., Snow, supra note 4; see also WintonDiMassa, supra note 5.
18.
See, e.g., SchmidtH., Just Health Responsibility, Journal of Medical Ethics35, no. 1 (2009): 21–26; see also Good Stewardship Working Group, The ‘Top 5 Lists in Primary Care: Meeting the Responsibility of Professionalism, Archives of Internal Medicine171, no. 15 (2011): 1385–1390.
19.
Id. (Good Stewardship Working Group).
20.
See, e.g., Cotera-Perez-Perez, supra note 5; see, e.g., Chipli, supra note 5; see also Fasser, supra note 15.
21.
See Good Stewardship Working Group, supra note 18; see also Schmidt, supra note 18.
22.
Id.
23.
American Medical Association, Code of Medical Ethics. Opinion 10.02 (5), Patient Responsibilities, June 1, 2001, available at <https://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion1002.page?> (last visited February 11, 2014); see HamowyR., Medical Responsibility, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics40, no. 3 (2012): 532–545; KontosN.QuerquesJ.FreudenreichO., Fighting the Good Fight: Responsibility and Rationale in the Confrontation of Patients, Mayo Clinic Proceedings87, no. 1 (2012): 63–66. See also Schmidt, supra note 18.
24.
See supra note 23.
25.
See supra note 18.
26.
See Good Stewardship Working Group, supra note 18.
27.
Id.
28.
See, e.g., Cotera-Perez-Perez, supra note 5; see, e.g., Chipli, supra note 5. See also Fasser, supra note 15 and supra note 18.