HerringJ.FosterC., Please Dont Tell Me. The Right not to Know, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics21, no. 1 (2012): 20–29JuthN., Genetic Information – Values and Rights: The Morality of Presymptomatic Genetic Testing (Saarbrüucken: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2012): Especially Chapters IV and V HelgessonG.SwartlingU., and ErikssonS., Limited Relevance of the Right Not to Know – Reflections on a Screening Study, Accountability in Research14, no. 3 (2007): 197–209.
2.
SwartlingU.ErikssonS.LudvigssonJ., and HelgessonG., Concern, Pressure and Lack of Knowledge Affect Choice of Not Wanting to Know High-Risk Status, European Journal of Human Genetics15, no. 5 (2007): 556–562.
3.
See Helgesson, supra note 1, at 200.
4.
See Swartling., supra note 2 at 559–560.
5.
ErikssonS.HelgessonG., Keep People Informed or Leave Them Alone? A Suggested Tool for Identifying Research Participants Who Rightly Want Only Limited Information, Journal of Medical Ethics31, no. 11 (2005): 674–678.
6.
HelgessonG.DillnerJ.CarlsonJ.BartramC. R., and HanssonM. G., Ethical Framework For Previously Collected Biobank Samples, Nature Biotechnology25, no. 9 (2007): 973–976.
7.
See Juth, supra note 1, chapter IV.
8.
HarrisJ.KeywoodK., Ignorance, Information and Autonomy, Theoretical Medicine22, no. 5 (2001): 415–436.
9.
See Juth, supra note 1, chapters IV-V
10.
ChadwickR.LevittM., and ShinckleD., eds., The Right to Know and Right Not to Know (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company, 1997)
11.
AndornoR., The Right Not to Know: An Autonomy Based Approach, Journal of Medical Ethics30, no. 5 (2004): 435–440.
12.
LaurieG., In Defence of Ignorance: Genetic Information and the Right Not to Know, European Journal of Health Law6, no. 2 (1999): 119–132LaurieG., Protecting and Promoting Privacy in an Uncertain World: Further Defences of Ignorance and the Right Not to Know, European Journal of Health Law7, no. 2 (2000): 185–191.
13.
See Juth, supra note 1, at 305ff; HarrisKeywood, supra note 9 RhodesR., Genetic Links, Family Ties and Social Bonds: Rights and Responsibilities in the Face of Genetic Knowledge, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy23, no. 1 (1998): 10–30.
14.
MillJ. S., On Liberty (Suffolk: Penguin Books, 1859/1974) TüannsjöoT., Coercive Care: The Ethics of Choice in Health and Medicine (New York/London: Routledge, 1999).
15.
See Juth, supra note 1, at 305; HerringFoster, supra note 1.
16.
TakalaT., Genes, Sense and Sensibility: Philosophical Studies on the Ethics of Modern Biotechnologies, Dissertation, Reports from the Department of Philosophy, University of Turku (2000): at 59–60.
17.
See Juth, supra note 1, e.g. at 322–323.
18.
DworkinG., The Concept of Autonomy, in ChristmanJ., ed., The Inner Citadel. Essays on Individual Autonomy (New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989): at 54–62DworkinG., The Theory and Practice of Autonomy (Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988): at 6 see Juth, supra note 1, at Chapter III.
19.
BeachampT. L.ChildressJ. F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics (New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001): at 57–58.
20.
FadenR.BeauchampT. L., A History and Theory of Informed Consent (New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986): at 8.
21.
See HarrisKeywood, supra note 9, at 420.
22.
TakalaT., Genetic Ignorance and Reasonable Paternalism,?Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics22 (2001): 485–491.
See Juth, supra note 1, at 305; HerringFoster, supra note 1; ChristenhuszG. M.DevriendtK., and DierickxK., To Tell or Not to Tell? A Systematic Review of Ethical Reflections on Incidental Findings Arising in Genetics Contexts, European Journal of Human Genetics21, no. 3 (2013): 248–55.
27.
Id. (Christenhusz), at 249.
28.
RichardsonH. S.ChoM. K.,‘Secondary Researchers Duties to Return Incidental Findings and Individual Research Results: A Partial-Entrustment Account, Genetics in Medicine14, no. 4 (2012): 467–472.
29.
Id., at 468.
30.
Id., at 468.
31.
Id., at 469–471.
32.
WolfS. M.CrockB. N., and Van NessB., Managing Incidental Findings and Research Results in Genomic Research Involving Biobanks and Archived Data Sets, Genetics in Medicine14, no. 4 (2012): 361–384.
33.
See Christenhusz, supra note 24, at 249, 252–253.
34.
KimS. Y. H., Evaluation of Capacity to Consent to Treatment and Research (New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).