BayerR.FairchildA. L., The Genesis of Public Health Ethics, Bioethics18, no. 6 (2004): 473–492.
2.
AndornoR., The Right Not to Know: An Autonomy Based Approach, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics30, no. 5 (2004): 435–440.
3.
AvardD.., Public Involvement in Health Genomics: The Reality Behind the Policies, International Journal of Consumer Studies34, no. 5 (2010): 508–524;RothwellE.AndersonR., and BotkinJ., Policy Issues and Stakeholder Concerns Regarding the Storage and Use of Residual Newborn Dried Blood Samples for Research, Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice11, no. 1 (2010): 5–12; Corporate Consultation Secretariat, Health Policy and Communications Branch, The Health Canada Policy Toolkit for Public Involvement in Decision Making, Cat. No.: H39-549/2000E (2000).
4.
MasséeR., Ethique et Santée Publique (Saint Nicolas, Quéebec: Les Presses de l'Universitée Laval, 2003): at 213.
5.
CarlstenC.BurkeW., Potential for Genetics to Promote Public Health: Genetics Research on Smoking Suggests Caution About Expectations, JAMA296, no. 20 (2006): 2480–2482.
6.
BoyceA.BorryP., Parental Authority, Future Autonomy, and Assessing Risks of Predictive Genetic Testing in Minors, Bioethical Inquiry6, no. 3 (2009): 379–385.
7.
JolyY.FezeI. N., and SimardJ., Genetic Discrimination and Life Insurance: A Systematic Review of the Evidence, BMC Medicine11, no. 25 (2013): Available at <http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/25> (last visited January 14, 2014).
8.
See MassëeA, supra note 4.
9.
HowardH. C., The Ethical Introduction of Genome Based Information and Technologies into Public Health, Public Health Genomics16, no. 3 (2013): 100–109.
10.
See Avard, supra note 3.
11.
BrandA.BrandH., and ShulteT. in DenBaüumen, The Impact of Genetics and Genomics on Public Health, European Journal of Human Genetics16, no. 5 (2008): 5–13.
12.
CleerenE., Public Health in the Genomic Era: Will Public Health Genomics Contribute to Major Changes in the Prevention of Common Diseases?Archives of Public Health69, no. 8 (2011): 1–12.
13.
Id.
14.
See Brand, supra note 11.
15.
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, Privacy and Progress in Whole Genome Sequencing (October 2012).
16.
SwartlingU., Concern, Pressure and a Lack of Knowledge Affect Choice of Not Wanting to Know, European Journal of Human Genetics15, no. 5 (2007): 556–562.
17.
See Cleeren, supra note 12.
18.
BombardY.MillerF. A., Reply to Ross' Commentary: Reproductive Benefit through Newborn Screening: Preferences, Policy, and Ethics, European Journal of Human Genetics20, no. 5 (2012): 486–487.
19.
KhouryM. J., The Continuum of Translation Research in Genomic Medicine: How Can We Accelerate the Appropriate Integration of Human Genome Discoveries into Health Care and Disease Prevention?Genetic Medicine9, no. 10 (2007): 665–674.
20.
See Brand, supra note 11.
21.
BurkeW., The Path from Genome-Based Research to Population Health: Development of an International Public Health Genomics Network, Genetics in Medicine8, no. 7 (2006): 451–458.
22.
See Brand, supra note 11.
23.
Id.
24.
See Avard, supra note 3.
25.
KnoppersB. M., Framing Genomics, Public Health Research and Policy: Points to Consider, Public Health Genomics13, no. 4 (2010): 224–234.
26.
StewartA., Genetics, Health Care and Public Policy: An Introduction to Public Health Genetics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
27.
Organization for Economic and Cultural Development, Citizens as Partners Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy Making (2001)World Health Organization, Ninth Futures Forum on Health Systems Governance and Public Participation, ISBN 92 890 2189 6 (October 11, 2005) UNESCO, Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (October 19, 2005).
28.
See Avard, supra note 3.
29.
See Andorno, supra note 2.
30.
UNESCO, Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights, Article 5c (December 11, 1997).
31.
UNESCO, Universal Declaration on Human Genetic Data, Article 10 (October 16, 2003).
32.
See, for example, the adult carrier screening program run by the Health and Social Services Agency of Saguenay-Lac Saint Jean in Quebec, Canada, initiated in 2010. This program screens those at risk for Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay; Leigh Syndrome, French-Canadian type; Tyrosinemia Type I; and Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum with Peripheral Neuropathy in order to provide reproductive decision-making information. See <http://www.santesaglac.gouv.qc.ca/index.html> for more information.
33.
See Andorno, supra note 2.
34.
See Brand, supra note 11.
35.
See Cleeren, supra note 12.
36.
See Massée, supra note 4.
37.
JolyY.FezeI. N., and SimardJ., Genetic Discrimination and Life Insurance: A Systematic Review of the Evidence, BMC Medicine11, no. 25 (2013): Available at <http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/25> (last visited January 14, 2014).
38.
See BoyceBorry, supra note 6.
39.
See Brand, supra note 11.
40.
See Cleeren, supra note 12.
41.
CollinsF. S., Shattuck Lecture – Medical and Societal Consequences of the Human Genome Project, New England Journal of Medicine341, no. 1 (1999): 28–37.
42.
McClureJ. B., Are Biomarkers a Useful Aid in Smoking Cessation? A Review and Analysis of the Literature, Behavioral Medicine27, no. 1 (2001): 37–47.
43.
See Cleeren, supra note 12.
44.
See CarlstenBurke, supra note 5.
45.
BerrettiniW.LermanC. E., Pharmacotherapy and Pharmacogenetics of Nicotine Dependence, American Journal of Psychiatry162, no. 8 (2005): 1441–1451.
46.
AcharyaK.AckermanP. D., and RossL. F., Pediatricians' Attitudes towards Expanding Newborn Screening, Pediatrics116, no. 4 (2005): e476–e484.
47.
TariniB. A.GoldenbergA. J., Ethical Issues with Newborn Screening in the Genomics Era, Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics13 (2012): 381–393WadeC. H.TariniB. A., and WilfondB. S., Growing up in the Genomic Era: Implications of Whole-Genome Sequencing for Children, Families, and Pediatric Practice, Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics14 (2013): 535–555MillerF. A.HayeemsR. Z., and BombardY., Clinical Obligations and Public Health Programmes: Healthcare Provider Reasoning about Managing the Incidental Results of Newborn Screening, Journal of Medical Ethics35, no. 10 (2009): 626–634.
48.
Committee on Bioethics, Committee on Genetics, The American College of Medical Genetics, Genomics, Social Ethical Legal Issues Committee, Ethical Issues in Genetic Testing and Screening of Children, Pediatrics131, no. 3 (2013): 620–622PollittR. J.Introducing New Screens: Why Are We All Doing Different Things?Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease30, no. 4 (2007): 423–429RossL. F., Technical Report: Ethical and Policy Issues in Genetic Testing and Screening Children, Genetics in Medicine15, no. 3 (2013): 234–245.
49.
KnoppersB. M., Paediatric Research and the Communication of Not-So-Incidental Findings, Paediatrics & Child Health17, no. 4 (2012): 190–192; KnoppersB. M.RiouxA., and ZawatiM., Pediatric Research ‘Personalized'? International Perspectives on the Return of Results, Future in Medicine10, no. 1 (2013): 89–95.
50.
BredenoordA. L.de VriesM. C., and van DeldenJ. J. M., Next-Generation Sequencing: Does the Next Generation Still Have a Right to an Open FutureNature Reviews Genetics14, no. 5 (2013): 306.
51.
See BayerFairchild, supra note 1;HowardH. C., The Ethical Introduction of Genome Based Information and Technologies into Public Health, Public Health Genomics (2013).
52.
See Bredenoord, supra note 50.
53.
Health Council of the Netherlands, The ‘Thousand-Dollar Genome': An Ethical Exploration, Monitoring Report Ethics and Health, February 2010.