BrownC. P., Self-Enforcing Trade: Developing Countries and WTO Dispute Settlement (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2009): At Chapter 1.
5.
Id.
6.
DrahosP., “Global Property Rights In Information: The Story of TRIPS at the GATT,”Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation13, no. 1 (1995): 6–19.
7.
The World Bank Atlas Method defines LDCs and LMICs as countries with a gross national income (GNI) per capita of less than 995 USD per capita and between 995 and 3945 USD, respectively.
8.
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, April 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, THE LEGAL TEXTS: THE RESULTS OF THE URUGUAY ROUND OF MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS 320 (1999), 1869 U.N.T.S. 299, 33 I.L.M. 1197 (1994) [hereinafter TRIPS Agreements].
9.
GanaR. L., “Prospects for Developing Countries Under the TRIPs Agreement,”Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law29 (1996): 735–776.
10.
StiglitzJ., “Trade Agreements and Health in Developing Countries,”The Lancet373, no. 9661 (2009): 363–365;.
11.
RezaieR.SingerP., “Global Health or Global Wealth?”Nature Biotechnology28, no. 9 (2010): 907–909.
12.
AdamsC. P.BranterV. V., “Estimating the Cost of New Drug Development: Is It Really Worth $802 million?”Health Affairs25, no. 2 (2006): 420–428.
13.
Public Citizen, “Not Too Costly after All: An Examination of the Inflated Cost Estimates of Health, Safety, and Environmental Protections” (2004), April 2012, available at <http://www.citizen.org/documents/ACF187.pdf>.
14.
U.S. International Trade Commission, Foreign Protection of IPRs and the Effects on the US Industry and Trade (Washington D.C., 1988).
15.
DrahosP., Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? (New York: New Press, 2002): At 66–68.
16.
SantoroM. A., Pfizer: Protecting Intellectual Property in a Global Marketplace (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School, 1992): at 6.
17.
AdedeA. O., “Origins and History of the TRIPS negotiations,” in Trading in Knowledge: Development Perspectives on TRIPS, Trade and Sustainability (London: Earthscan Publications, 2003): at 24.
18.
HoekmanB. M., “New Issues in the Uruguay Round and Beyond,”Economic Journal103, no. 421 (1993): 1528–1539.
19.
The other 8 countries were Argentina, Cuba, Egypt, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Peru, Tanzania, and Yugoslavia.
20.
LanoszkaA., “The Global Politics of Intellectual Property Rights and Pharmaceutical Drug Policies in Developing Countries,”International Political Science Review24, no. 2 (2003): 181–197.
21.
NachaneD. M., “Intellectual Property Rights in the Uruguay Round: An Indian Perspective,”Economic and Political Weekly30, no. 5 (1995): 257–268.
22.
ShafferG., “Recognizing Public Goods in WTO Dispute Settlement: Who Participates? Who Decides? The Case of TRIPS and Pharmaceutical Patent Protection,”Journal of International Economic Law7, no. 2 (2004): 459–482.
23.
TimmermansK.HutadjuluT., The TRIPS Agreement and Pharmaceuticals, World Health Organization, Jakarta, May 2–4, 2000, available at <http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/pdf/h1459e/h1459e.pdf> (last visited November 8, 2013).
OddiA. S., “TRIPS – Natural Rights and a ‘Polite Form of Economic Imperialism,”Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law29 (1996): 415–470;.
35.
WeissmanR., “A Long, Strange, TRIPS: The Pharmaceutical industry Drive to Harmonize Global Intellectual Property Rules, and the Remaining WTO Legal Alternatives Available to Third World Countries,”University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law25, no. 3 (1996): 1079–1125;.
36.
AdelmanM. J.BaldiaS., “Prospects and Limits of the Patent Provision in the TRIPS Agreement,”Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law29 (1996): 507;.
37.
SubramanianA.“Putting Some Numbers on the TRIPS Pharmaceutical Debate,”International Journal of Technology Management10, nos. 2–3 (1995): 252–268.
38.
GellerP. E., “Intellectual Property in the Global Marketplace: Impact of TRIPS Dispute Settlements?”International Lawyer29, no. 1 (1995): 99–116.
Compulsory licensing refers to compelled licensing without the consent of the patent holder, on terms set forth by the government. Parallel importation, by contrast, is the process by which non-counterfeit products are imported from a country in which they are legally sold at a low price to another country in which the owner of the intellectual property is selling the product at a higher price. Compulsory licensing of pharmaceutical products is thought to aid developing countries by reducing the price that consumers pay for patented drugs that can be produced locally without involvement of the patent-holder, while parallel importation is thought to introduce greater competition into the market for pharmaceuticals, thereby also reducing the price paid by the average consumer.
42.
See DOHA Declaration, supra note 35.
43.
MusunguS.F.VillanuevaS.BlasettiR., The South Centre, Utilizing TRIPS Flexibilities for Public Health Protection through South-South Regional Frameworks, World Health Organization, April 2004, available at <http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/pdf/s4968e/s4968e.pdf> (last visited November 8, 2013).
44.
See Doha Declaration, supra note 35.
45.
WeberA.MillsL., “A One-Time-Only Combination: Emergency Medicine Exports and the TRIPS Agreement under Canada's Access to Medicines Regime,”Journal of Health and Human Rights12, no. 1 (2010): 109–122;.
NattrassN. J., “The Political Economics of Antiretroviral Treatment in Developing Countries,”Trends in Microbiology16, no. 12 (2008): 574–579.
48.
't HoenE., “Public Health and International Law: TRIPS, Pharmaceutical Patents, and Access to Essential Medicines: A Long Way from Seattle to Doha,”Chicago Journal of International Law3, no. 1 (2002): 27–46, at 30–31.
49.
SidleyP., “Silent Trump Card Gives State Winning Hand,”Business Day South Africa, April 20, 2001;
50.
id. (Hoen), at 31.
51.
CerónA.GodoyA. S., “Intellectual Property and Access to Medicines: An Analysis of Legislation in Central America,”Bulletin of the World Health Organization87, no. 10 (2009): 787–793.
52.
See Musungu, supra note 38.
53.
HettingerH. C., “Justifying Intellectual Property,”Philosophy and Public Affairs18, no. 1 (1989): 31–52.
54.
LockeJ., The Second Treatise of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration (Mineola, N.Y.: Dover, c.2002): At Chapter V: Of Property.
55.
See Hettinger, supra note 45.
56.
MosesH.MartinJ. B., “Academic Relationships with Industry: A New Model for Biomedical Research,”JAMA285, no. 7 (2001): 933–935.
57.
SungN. S.CrowleyW. F.Jr.GenelM., “Central Challenges Facing the National Clinical Research Enterprise,”JAMA289, no. 10 (2003):.
58.
BurnsL. R.HousmanM. G.RobinsonC. A., “Market Entry and Exit by Biotech and Device Companies Funded by Venture Capital,”Health Affairs28, no. 1 (2009): w76–w86.
59.
LoscalzoJ., “The NIH Budget and the Future of Biomedical Research,”New England Journal of Medicine354, no. 16 (2006): 1665–1667.
SchachtW.G., Drug Discovery, and Pricing: Insights from the NIH-University-Industry Relationship, CRS Report RL30585, U.S. Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, Federal R&D (Washington, D.C.: Office of Congressional Information and Publishing, December 14, 2006).
63.
United States General Accounting Office, NIH-Private Sector Partnership in the Development of Taxol (GAO-03-829), Washington, D.C., 2003.
64.
SampatB. N., “Academic Patents and Access to Medicines in Developing Countries,”American Journal of Public Health99, no. 1 (2009): 9–17.
65.
SterckxS., “Patents and Access to Drugs in Developing Countries: An Ethical Analysis,”Developing World Bioethics4, no. 1 (2004): 58–75.
66.
Id.
67.
See Locke, supra note 46.
68.
NozickR., Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974).
69.
Id.
70.
See Hettinger, supra note 45.
71.
AshburnT. T.ThorK. B., “Drug Repositioning: Identifying and Developing New Uses for Existing Drugs,”Nature Reviews Drug Discovery3, no. 8 (2004): 673–683.
72.
Id.
73.
See Nozick, supra note 60.
74.
See Locke, supra note 46.
75.
Id.
76.
LaslettP., Locke: Two Treatises of Government (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988);
77.
Hettinger, supra note 44;.
78.
BergerJ. M.,“Tripping over Patents: AIDS, Access to Treatment and the Manufacturing of Scarcity,”Connecticut Journal of International Law (2001–2002): 157–248.
79.
SharpA. M.RegisterC. A.GrimesP. W., Economics of Social Issues (New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2003).
80.
DhamijaP.BansalD.MedhiB., “Trends and Economic Stress: A Challenge to Universal Access to Antiretroviral Treatment in India,”Current HIV Research7, no. 4 (2009): 410–417.
81.
VassallA.CompernolleP., “Estimating the Resource Needs of Scaling-Up HIV/AIDS and Tuberculosis Interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review for National Policy Makers and Planners,”Health Policy79, no. 1 (2006): 1–15.
82.
MillsE. J.NachegaJ. B.BuchanI., “Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy in Sub-Saharan Africa and North America: A Meta-Analysis,”JAMA296, no. 6 (2006): 679–690.
83.
DoaneM. L., “TRIPS and International Intellectual Property Protection in an Age of Advancing Technology,”American University Journal of International Law and Policy9, no. 2 (1994): 465–497;.
84.
BragaC. A. P.FinkC., “The Economic Justification for the Grant of Intellectual Property Rights: Patterns of Convergence and Conflict,”Chicago-Kent Law Review72 (1996): 439–462;.
85.
KoshyS.,“The Effect of TRIPs on Indian Patent Law: A Pharmaceutical Industry Perspective,”Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law1, no. 4 (1995): 123–149;.
86.
BaleH. E.Jr., “Patent Protection and Pharmaceutical Innovation,”New York University Journal of International Law and Politics29 (1995): 95–108.
87.
See Sterckx, supra note 57.
88.
See Bale, Jr., supra note 73.
89.
WatalJ., “Access to Essential Medicines in Developing Countries: Does the WTO TRIPS Agreement Hint It?”Science, Technology, and Innovation Discussion Paper No. 8, Center for International Development at Harvard University, 2000.
90.
MuellerJ. M., “Taking TRIPS to India: Novartis, Patent Law, and Access to Medicines,”New England Journal of Medicine356, no. 6 (2007): 541–543.
91.
ReichmannJ. H., “Compulsory Licensing of Patented Pharmaceutical Inventions: Evaluating the Options,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics37, no. 2 (2009): 247–263.
92.
DharB.GopakumarK.M., “Data Exclusivity in Pharmaceuticals: Little Basis, False Claims,”Economic and Political Weekly41, no. 49 (2006): 5073–5079.
93.
Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc., 570 U.S. 756 (2013).
94.
See Sterckx, supra note 57.
95.
ChaudhuriS., The WTO and India's Pharmaceuticals Industry: Patent Protection, TRIPS, and Developing Countries (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005)
96.
ShivaV., Protect of Plunder: Understanding Intellectual Property Rights (London: Zed Books, 2001).
97.
HaleyG. T.HaleyU. C. V., “The Effects of Patent Law Changes on Innovation: The Case of India's Pharmaceutical Industry,”Technological Forecasting and Social Change79, no. 4 (2011): 607–619.
98.
BragaC. A. P.FinkC., “The Relationship between Intellectual Property Rights and Foreign Direct Investment,”Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law9 (1998): 163–187.
99.
See Sterckx, supra note 57.
100.
AvornJ., Powerful Medicines: The Benefits, Risks, and Costs of Prescription Drugs (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2005).
101.
PécoulB.ChiracP.TrouillerP.PinelJ., “Access to Essential Drugs in Poor Countries: A Lost Battle?”JAMA281, no. 4 (1999): 360–368.
102.
see Smith, supra note 40.
103.
RavvinM., “Incentivizing Access and Innovation for Essential Medicines: A Survey of the Problem and Proposed Solutions,”Public Health Ethics1, no. 2 (2008): 110–123.
104.
KremerM.GinnersterR., Strong Medicine: Creating Incentives for Pharmaceutical Research on Neglected Diseases (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).
105.
PoggeT.RimmerM.RubensteinK., Incentives for Global Public Health: Patent Law and Access to Essential Medicines (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).
106.
Id.
107.
SatyanarayanaK.SrivastavaS., “Patent Pooling for Promoting Access to Antiretroviral Drugs: A Strategic Option for India,”Open AIDS Journal4, no. 1 (2010): 41–53.
108.
OuttersonK.KesselheimA. S., “Market-Based Licensing for HPV Vaccines in Developing Countries,”Health Affairs27, no. 1 (2008): 130–139.