McCurdyE., The Mind of Leonardo da Vinci (New York: Dover Publications, 2005): At 23.
2.
SahS., “Conflicts of Interest and Your Physician: Psychological Processes That Cause Unexpected Changes in Behavior,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics40, no. 3 (2012): 482–487.
3.
CialdiniR. B., The Psychology of Persuasion (New York: Quill William Morrow, 1984).
4.
WazanaA., “Physicians and the Pharmaceutical Industry: Is a Gift Ever Just a Gift?”JAMA283, no. 3 (2000): 373–380; OrlowskiJ. P.WateskaL., “The Effects of Pharmaceutical Firm Enticements on Physician Prescribing Patterns. There's No Such Thing as a Free Lunch,”Chest102, no. 1 (1992): 270–273; ChrenM. M.LandefeldC. S., “Physicians' Behavior and Their Interactions with Drug Companies,”JAMA271, no. 9 (1994): 684–689; ElliottC., White Coat, Black Hat: Adventures on the Dark Side of Medicine (Boston: Beacon Press, 2010).
5.
ShaughnessyA. F.SlawsonD. C.BennettJ. H., “Separating the Wheat from the Chaff,”Journal of General Internal Medicine9, no. 10 (1994): 563–568; MolloyW.StrangD.GuyattG.LexchinJ.BédardM.DuboisS.RussoR., “Assessing the Quality of Drug Detailing,”Journal of Clinical Epidemiology55, no. 8 (2002): 825–832.
6.
AvornJ.ChenM.HartleyR., “Scientific Versus Commercial Sources of Influence on the Prescribing Behavior of Physicians,”American Journal of Medicine73, no. 1 (1982): 4–8.
7.
SahS.MooreD. A.MacCounR., “Cheap Talk and Credibility: The Consequences of Confidence and Accuracy on Advisor Credibility and Persuasiveness,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes121, no. 2 (2013): 246–255.
8.
TverskyA.KahnemanD., “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,”Science185, no. 4157 (1974): 1124–1131; StrackF.MussweilerT., “Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology73, no. 3 (1997): 437–446; SkurnikI.YoonC.ParkD.C.SchwarzN., “How Warnings about False Claims Become Recommendations,”Journal of Consumer Research31, no. 4 (2005): 713–724.
9.
MakhinsonM., “Biases in Medication Prescribing: The Case of Second-Generation Antipsychotics,”Journal of Psychiatric Practice16, no. 1 (2010): 15–21.
10.
See Sah, supra note 2; SahS.LoewensteinG., “Effect of Reminders of Personal Sacrifice and Suggested Rationalizations on Residents' Self-reported Willingness to Accept Gifts: A Randomized Trial,”JAMA304, no. 11 (2010): 1204–1211.
11.
LurieN.RichE. C.SimpsonD. E.MeyerJ.SchiedermayerD. L.GoodmanJ. L.McKinneyW. P., “Pharmaceutical Representatives in Academic Medical Centers,”Journal of General Internal Medicine5, no. 3 (1990): 240–243; WazanaA., “Physicians and the Pharmaceutical Industry: Is a Gift Ever Just a Gift?”JAMA283, no. 3 (2000): 373–380; ChrenM. M.LandefeldC. S., “Physicians' Behavior and Their Interactions with Drug Companies: A Controlled Study of Physicians Who Requested Additions to a Hospital Drug Formulary,”JAMA271, no. 9 (1994): 684–689.
12.
McKinneyW. P.SchiedermayerD. L.LurieN.SimpsonD. E.GoodmanJ. L.RichE. C., “Attitudes of Internal Medicine Faculty and Residents toward Professional Interaction with Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives,”JAMA264, no. 13 (1990): 1693–1697; SteinmanM. A.ShlipakM. G.McPheeS. J., “Of Principles and Pens: Attitudes and Practices of Medicine Housestaff toward Pharmaceutical Industry Promotions,”American Journal of Medicine110, no. 7 (2001): 551–557; SigworthS. K.NettlemanM. D.CohenG. M., “Pharmaceutical Branding of Resident Physicians,”JAMA286, no. 9 (2001): 1024–1025.
13.
DanaJ.LoewensteinG., “A Social Science Perspective on Gifts to Physicians from Industry,”JAMA290, no. 2 (2003): 252–255.
14.
ProninE.LinD. Y.RossL., “The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin28, no. 3 (2002): 369–391; ProninE.GilovichT.RossL., “Objectivity in the Eye of the Beholder: Divergent Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others,”Psychological Review111, no. 3 (2004): 781–799.
15.
ProninE.GilovichT.RossL., “Objectivity in the Eye of the Beholder: Divergent Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others,”Psychological Review111, no. 3 (2004): 781–799; BabcockL.LoewensteinG.IssacharoffS., “Creating Convergence: Debiasing Biased Litigants,”Law & Social Inquiry22, no. 4 (1997): 913–925.
16.
BabcockL.LoewensteinG., “Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases,”Journal of Economic Perspectives11, no. 1 (1997): 109–126; BabcockL.LoewensteinG.IssacharoffS.CamererC., “Biased Judgments of Fairness in Bargaining,”American Economic Review85, no. 5 (1995): 1337–1343; LoewensteinG.IssacharoffS.CamererC.BabcockL., “Self-Serving Assessments of Fairness and Pretrial Bargaining,”Journal of Legal Studies22, no. 1 (1993): 135–159.
17.
Id. (BabcockLoewenstein, “Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases,”Journal of Economic Perspectives11, no. 1 (1997): 109–126.
18.
FestingerL., A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford University Press, 1957): At 1–31.
19.
ChimonasS. C.BrennanT. A.RothmanD. J., “Physicians and Drug Representatives: Exploring the Dynamics of the Relationship,”Journal of General Internal Medicine22, no. 2 (2007): 184–190.
20.
See supra note 2.
21.
SahS.LarrickR., “I Am Immune: A Sense of Invulnerability Predicts Increased Acceptance of, and Influence from, Conflicts of Interest,”Research in Progress (2013); ProninE.LinD. Y.RossL., “The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin28, no. 3 (2002): 369–391.
See SahS.LoewensteinG., “Effect of Reminders of Personal Sacrifice and Suggested Rationalizations on Residents' Self-reported Willingness to Accept Gifts: A Randomized Trial,”JAMA304, no. 11 (2010): 1204–1211.
24.
CialdiniR. B., Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion (New York: HarperBusiness, 2006); GoldsteinN. J.MartinS. J.CialdiniR. B., Yes!: 50 Scientifically Proven Ways to Be Persuasive (New York: Free Press, 2008).
25.
See Cialdini, supra note 24, at 17–56.
26.
MaussM., The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies (London: Routledge, 2006).
27.
MatherC., “The Pipeline and the Porcupine: Alternate Metaphors of the Physician–Industry Relationship,”Social Science Medicine60, no. 6 (2005): 1323–1334.
28.
OldaniM. M., “Thick Prescriptions: Toward an Interpretation of Pharmaceutical Sales Practices,”Medical Anthropology Quarterly18, no. 3 (2004): 325–356.
29.
See Elliott, supra note 4, at 63.
30.
Id., at 55–56.
31.
See supra note 27.
32.
See, RodwinM., “Five Un-Easy Pieces to Pharmaceutical Policy Reform,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics41, no. 3 (2013): 581–589.
Fugh-BermanA.AhariS., “Following the Script: How Drug Reps Make Friends and Influence Doctors,”PLoS Medicine4, no. 4 (2007): 621–625.
35.
See Cialdini, supra note 24, at 17–56; CialdiniR. B.VincentJ. E.LewisS. K.CatalanJ.WheelerD.DarbyB. L., “Reciprocal Concessions Procedure for Inducing Compliance: The Door-in-the-Face Technique,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology31, no. 2 (1975): 206–215; MalmendierU.SchmidtK. M., “You Owe Me,”Working Paper (2011); FriedmanH.RahmanA., “Gifts-Upon-Entry and Appreciatory Comments: Reciprocity Effects in Retailing,”International Journal of Marketing Studies3, no. 3 (2011): 161–164.
36.
Id. (MalmendierSchmidt).
37.
ReganD. T., “Effects of a Favor and Liking on Compliance,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology7, no. 6 (1971): 627–639.
38.
See FriedmanRahman, supra note 35.
39.
See supra note 33.
40.
Fugh-BermanA., “Prescription Tracking and Public Health,”Journal of General Internal Medicine23, no. 8 (2008): 1277–1280.
41.
See Cialdini, supra note 24, at 57–113.
42.
KnoxR. E.InksterJ. A., “Postdecision Dissonance at Post Time,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology8, no. 4 (1968): 319–323.
43.
See supra note 40.
44.
HowardD. J., “The Influence of Verbal Responses to Common Greetings on Compliance Behavior: The Foot-In-The-Mouth Effect,”Journal of Applied Social Psychology20, no. 14 (1990): 1185–1196.
45.
CialdiniR. B., Influence: Science and Practice (Illinois: Scott, Foresman Glenview, 1985): At 116; AschS. E., “Studies of Independence and Conformity: I. A Minority of One Against a Unanimous Majority,”Psychological Monographs: General and Applied70, no. 9 (1956): 1–70; DeutschM.GerardH. B., “A Study of Normative and Informational Social Influences upon Individual Judgment,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology51, no. 3 (1955): 629–636.
46.
KingM.EssickC.BearmanP.RossJ. S., “Medical School Gift Restriction Policies and Physician Prescribing of Newly Marketed Psychotropic Medications: Difference-in-Differences Analysis,”BMJ346 (2013): 1–9.
47.
GrandeD.FroschD. L.PerkinsA. W.KahnB. E., “Effect of Exposure to Small Pharmaceutical Promotional Items on Treatment Preferences,”Archives of Internal Medicine169, no. 9 (2009): 887–893.
48.
AustadK. E.AvornJ.KesselheimA. S., “Medical Students' Exposure to and Attitudes about the Pharmaceutical Industry: A Systematic Review,”PLoS Medicine8, no. 5 (2011): 1–12.
49.
Id.
50.
McCormickB. B.TomlinsonG.Brill-EdwardsP.DetskyA. S., “Effect of Restricting Contact between Pharmaceutical Company Representatives and Internal Medicine Residents on Posttraining Attitudes and Behavior,”JAMA286, no. 16 (2001): 1994–1999; FergusonR. P.RhimE.BelizaireW.EgedeL.CarterK.LansdaleT., “Encounters with Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives among Practicing Internists,”American Journal of Medicine107, no. 2 (1999): 149–152.
51.
See Steinman, supra note 12; SierlesF. S.BrodkeyA. C.ClearyL. M.McCurdyF. A.MintzM.FrankJ.LynnD. J., “Medical Students' Exposure to and Attitudes about Drug Company Interactions: A National Survey,”JAMA294, no. 9 (2005): 1034–1042.
52.
See supra note 33.
53.
See Elliott, supra note 4, at 64.
54.
Id., at 56.
55.
See supra note 33.
56.
See, SismondoS., “Key Opinion Leaders and the Corruption of Medical Knowledge: What the Sunshine Act Will and Won't Cast Light On,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics41, no. 3 (2013): 635–643.
57.
See Elliott, supra note 4; SteinmanM. A.HarperG. M.ChrenM.-M.LandefeldC. S.BeroL. A., “Characteristics and Impact of Drug Detailing for Gabapentin,”PLoS Medicine4, no. 4 (2007): 743–751.
58.
See Elliott, supra note 4, at 77.
59.
See supra note 33.
60.
GoldfingerS. E., “A Matter of Influence.”New England Journal of Medicine316, no. 22 (1987): 1408–1409.
61.
FestingerL., A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1957); FestingerL.CarlsmithJ. M., “Cognitive Consequences of Forced Compliance,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology58, no. 2 (1959): 203–210.
62.
Id. (FestingerCarlsmith).
63.
KelmanH. C., “Attitude Change as a Function of Response Restriction,”Human Relations6, no. 3 (1953): 185–214.
64.
See Goldfinger, supra note 60; ChrenLandefeld, supra note 11.
65.
Id. (ChrenLandefeld).
66.
See Sierles, supra note 51.
67.
SagarinB. J.CialdiniR. B.RiceW. E.SernaS. B., “Dispelling the Illusion of Invulnerability: The Motivations and Mechanisms of Resistance to Persuasion,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83, no. 3 (2002): 526–541.
68.
Fugh-BermanA.ScialliA.BellA. M., “Why Lunch Matters: Assessing Physician's Perceptions about Industry Relationships,”Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions30, no. 3 (2010): 197–204.