AngellM., The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What To Do About It (New York: Crown Publishing Group/Random House, 2004).
15.
EndicottJ.AmsterdamJ.ErikssonE.FrankE.FreemanE.HirschfeldR.LingF.ParryB.PearlsteinT.RosenbaumJ.RubinowD.SchmidtP.SeverinoS.SteinerM.StewartD. E.Thys-JacobsS., “Is Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder a Distinct Clinical Entity?”Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine8, no. 5 (1999): 663–679.
16.
AxelsonD. A.BimaherB.FindlingR. L.FristadM. A.KowatchR. A.YoungstromE. A.ArnoldE. L.GoldsteinB. I.GoldsteinT. R.ChangK. D.DelbelloM. P.RyanN. D.DilerR. S., “Concerns Regarding the Inclusion of Temper Dysregulation Disorder with Dysphoria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition,”Journal of Clinical Psychiatry72, no. 9 (2011): 1257–1262; RobbinsB. D.HigginsM.FisherM.OverK., “Conflicts of Interest in Research on Antipsychotic Treatment in Pediatric Bipolar Disorder, Temper Dysregulation Disorder, and Attenuated Psychotic Symptoms Syndrome: Exploring the Unholy Alliance Between Big Pharma and Psychiatry,”Journal of Psychological Issues in Organizational Culture1, no. 4 (2011): 32–49.
17.
BatstraL.FrancesA., “Diagnostic Inflation: Causes and a Suggested Cure,”Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease200, no. 6 (2012): 474–479.
CosgroveL.KrimskyS., “A Comparison of DSM-IV and DSM-5 Panel Members' Financial Associations with Industry: A Pernicious Problem Persists,”PLoS Medicine9, no. 3 (2012): e1001190.
22.
Institute of Medicine, Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program, FieldM. J.LohrK. N., eds. (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1990).
23.
ShaneyfeltT. M.CentorR.M., “Reassessment of Clinical Practice Guidelines: Go Gently into that Good Night,”JAMA301, no. 8 (2009): 868–869.
24.
KrimskyS., “Combating the Funding Effect in Science: What's Beyond Transparency?”Stanford Law Policy ReviewXXI, no. 1 (2010): 101–123.
25.
BekelmanJ.LiY.GrossC., “Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review,”JAMA289, no. 4 (2003): 454–465; StelfoxH.ChuaG.O'RourkeK.DetskyA., “Conflict of Interest in the Debate Over Calcium-Channel Antagonists,”New England Journal of Medicine338, no. 2 (1998): 101–106; KjaergardL.Als-NielsenB., “Association between Competing Interests and Authors' Conclusions: Epidemiological Study of Randomised Clinical Trials Published in the BMJ,”BMJ325, no. 7358 (2002): 249. Because pharmaceutical firms can affect study conclusions by funding and directing the research, several authors have called for independent clinical trials to test drugs for obtaining authorization to market drugs and to evaluate drugs once on the market. See RodwinM., “Five UnEasy Pieces to Pharmaceutical Policy Reform,”Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics41, no. 3 (2013): 581–589; LightD. W.LexchinJ.DarrowJ., “Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs,”Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics41, no. 3 (2013): 590–600.
26.
QuanstrumK. H.HaywardR. A., “Lessons from the Mammography Wars,”New England Journal of Medicine363, no. 11 (2010): 1076–1079.
27.
Institute of Medicine (IOM), Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2011).
28.
MehlmanM., “Medical Practice Guidelines as Malpractice Safe Harbors: Illusion or Deceit?”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics40, no. 2 (2012): 286–300.
29.
ElliottC., “Industry-Funded Bioethics and the Limits of Disclosure,” in ArnoldD. G., ed., Ethics and Business of Biomedicine (Cambridge University Press, 2009): 150–168, at 161.
30.
See Lessig, supra note 2.
31.
Id.; RodwinM. A., “Conflicts of Interest, Institutional Corruption, and Pharma: An Agenda for Reform,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics40, no. 2 (2012): 511–522.
AvornJ.ChenM.HartleyR., “Scientific Versus Commercial Sources of Influence on the Prescribing Behavior of Physicians,”American Journal of Medicine73, no. 1 (1982): 4–8; OrlowskiJ.WateskaL., “The Effects of Pharmaceutical Firm Enticements on Physician Prescribing Patterns,”Chest102, no. 1 (1992): 270–273.
34.
DanaJ.LoewensteinG., “A Social Science Perspective on Gifts to Physicians From Industry,”JAMA290, no. 2 (2003): 252–255.
35.
LexchinJ.O'DonovanO., “Prohibiting or ‘Managing’ Conflict of Interest? A Review of Policies and Procedures in Three European Drug Regulation Agencies,”Social Science & Medicine70, no. 5 (2010): 643–647.
36.
YankV.RennieD.BeroL., “Financial Ties and Concordance between Results and Conclusions in Meta-Analyses: Retrospective Cohort,”BMJ335, no. 7631 (2007): 1202–1205.
37.
CosgroveL.ShaughnessyA. F.WheelerE. E.AustadK. E.KirschI.BursztajnH. J., “The American Psychiatric Association's Guideline for Major Depressive Disorder: A Commentary,”Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics81, no. 3 (2012): 186–188.
38.
KirschI.DeaconB. J.Huedo-MedinaT. B.ScoboriaA.MooreT. J.JohnsonB. T., “Initial Severity and Antidepressant Benefits: A Meta-Analysis of Data Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration,”PLoS Medicine5, no. 2 (2008): E45; FournierJ. C.DeRubeisR. J.HollonS. D.DimidjianS.AmsterdamJ. D.SheltonR. C.FawcettJ., “Antidepressant Drug Effects and Depression Severity: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis,”JAMA303, no. 1 (2010): 47–53.
39.
See KirschDeaconHuedo-MedinaScoboriaMooreJohnson, supra note 38, at 260.
40.
See FournierDeRubeisHollonDimidjianAmsterdamSheltonFawcett, supra note 38, at 51–52.
41.
American Psychiatric Association, Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Major Depressive Disorder (2010), at 31.
42.
For insights on the role of pharma influencing key opinion leaders see, SismondoS., “Key Opinion Leaders and the Corruption of Medical Knowledge: What the Sunshine Act Will and Won't Cast Light On,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics41, no. 3 (2013): 635–643.
43.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, “Depression: The Treatment and Management of Depression in Adults,”NICE Clinical Guideline no. 90 (2009), London, U.K.
44.
Van Weel-BaumgartenE. M.Van GelderenM. G.GrundmeijerH. G. L. M.Licht-StrunkE.Van MarwijkH. W. J.Van RijswijkH. C. A. M.TjadenB. R.VerduijnM.WiersmaT.BurgersJ. S.Van AvendonkM. J. P.Van der WeeleG. M., “NHG Standaard Depressie (Tweede Herziening),”Huisarts en Wetenschap55, no. 6 (2012): 252–259.
45.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, “Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Ethical Considerations in the Conduct and Reporting of Research: Conflicts of Interest,” April, 2010, available at <http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf> (last visited June 7, 2013).
46.
BrandeisL., “What Publicity Can Do,”Harper's Weekly58, December 20, 1913, at 10–13.
47.
See Elliott, supra note 29; the PLoS Medicine Editors, “Does Conflict of Interest Disclosure Worsen Bias?”PLoS Medicine9, no. 4 (2012): E1001210.
48.
See Krimsky, supra note 24, at 108.
49.
BrauserD., “Psychiatrists Top List of Big Pharma Payments Again,”Medscape, May 14, 2013, available at <http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/780835> (membership required to view article).
50.
See PLoS Medicine Editors, supra note 47; CainD. M.LoewensteinG.MooreD. A., “When Sunlight Fails to Disinfect: Understanding the Perverse Effects of Disclosing Conflicts of Interest,”Journal of Consumer Research37, no. 5 (2011): 836–857; LoewensteinG.SahS.CainD. M., “The Unintended Consequences of Conflicts of Interest Disclosure,”JAMA307, no. 7 (2012): 669–670; SahS.LoewensteinG.CainD. M., “The Burden of Disclosure: Increased Compliance with Distrusted Advice,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology104, no. 2 (2013): 289–304. For discussions of the limitations of disclosures, see in this issue of JLME41, no. 3 (2013): Sismondo, supra note 42; FeldmanY.GauthierR.SchullerT., “Curbing Misconduct in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Insights from Behavioral Ethics and the Behavioral Approach to Law,”620–628; and BrownA., “Understanding Pharmaceutical Research Manipulation in the Context of Accounting Manipulation,” at 611–619.
51.
See DanaLoewenstein, supra note 34; see PLoS Medicine Editors, supra note 47.
52.
IoannidisJ. P. A.TatsioniA.KarassaF. B., “Who Is Afraid of Reviewers' Comments? Or Why Anything Can Be Published and Anything Can Be Cited,”European Journal of Clinical Investigation40, no. 4 (2010): 285–287; PitrouI.BoutronI.AhmedN.RavaudP., “Reporting of Safety Results in Published Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials,”Archives of Internal Medicine169, no. 19 (2009): 1756–1761.
53.
See Lessig, supra note 2.
54.
GopalA. A.CosgroveL.Shuv-AmiI.WheelerE. E.YerganianM. J.BursztajnH. J., “Dynamic Informed Consent Processes Vital for Treatment with Antidepressants,”International Journal of Law and Psychiatry35, no. 5–6 (2012): 392–397.
55.
Id.
56.
BluhmR., “Evidence-Based Medicine and Patient Autonomy,”International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics2, no. 2 (2009): 134–151.
57.
LightD., “Bearing the Risks of Prescription Drugs,” in LightD., ed., The Risks of Prescription Drugs (New York: Columbia University Press): At 1–39.
58.
GagnonM.-A., “Corporate Influence Over Clinical Research: Considering the Alternatives,”Prescrire32, no. 342 (2012): 311–314.
59.
RodwinM. A., “Drug Advertising, Continuing Medical Education, and Physician Prescribing: A Historical Review and Reform Proposal,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics38, no. 4 (2010): 807–815; BrodkeyA., “The Role of the Pharmaceutical Industry in Teaching Psychopharmacology: A Growing Problem,”Academic Psychiatry29, no. 2 (2005): 222–229.
60.
BursztajnH. J.FeinbloomR. I.HammR. M., Medical Choices, Medical Chances: How Patients, Families, and Physicians Can Cope with Uncertainty (New York/London: Routledge, 1990).