56 Fed. Reg. 28,003–28,023 (June 18, 1991). The HHS regulations implementing the Common Rule are codified at 45 C.F.R. part 46, subpart A.
2.
“Human Subjects Research Protections: Enhancing Protections for Research Subjects and Reducing Burden, Delay, and Ambiguity for Investigators,” 76Fed. Reg. 44,512–44,531 (July 26, 2011) [hereinafter ANPRM].
3.
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, Moral Science: Protecting Participants in Human Subjects Research (December 2011).
4.
Institute of Medicine, Responsible Research: A Systems Approach to Protecting Research Participants (2002).
5.
National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants, Vol. 1 (August 2001).
6.
Government Accountability Office, Human Subjects Research: HHS Takes Steps to Strengthen Protections, But Concerns Remain, GAO-01-775T (2001).
7.
KimS.UbelP.De VriesR., “Pruning the Regulatory Tree,”Nature457, no. 7229 (2009): 534–535.
8.
EmanuelE. J., “Oversight of Human Participants Research: Identifying Problems to Evaluate Reform Proposals,”Annals of Internal Medicine141, no. 4 (2004): 282–291.
9.
EmanuelE. J.MenikoffJ., “Reforming the Regulations Governing Research with Human Subjects,”New England Journal of Medicine365, no. 12 (2011): 1145–1150, at 1145.
10.
PuglisiT., “Reform within the Common Rule?”Hastings Center Report Special Report 43, no. 1 (2013): S40–S42, at S40.
11.
Exec. Order No. 13,563, “Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,” 76Fed. Reg. 3821–3823, at 3822 (January 18, 2011).
EysenbachG., “Medicine 2.0: Social Networking, Collaboration, Participation, Apomediation, and Openness,”Journal of Medical Internet Research10, no. 3 (2008): e22, available at <http://www.jmir.org/2008/3/e22/> (last visited May 16, 2013).