VerebeyK. and GoldM. S.“From Coca Leaves to Crack: The Effects of Dose and Routes of Administration in Abuse Liability”Psychiatric Annals18, no. 9(1988): 513–520.
5.
EatonS. B.“The Ancestral Diet: What Was It and Should It Be a Paradigm for Contemporary Nutrition?”Proceedings of the Nutrition Society65, no. 1(2006): 1–6.
6.
GearhardtA. N., “The Addiction Potential of Hyperpalatable Foods”Current Drug Abuse Reviews4, no. 3(2011): 140–145.
7.
ZiauddeenH.FarooqiS. and FletcherP.C.“Obesity and the Brain: How Convincing Is the Addiction Model?”Nature Reviews Neuroscience13, no. 4(2012):279–286; AvenaN. M.RadaP. and HoebelB. G.“Evidence for Sugar Addiction: Behavioral and Neurochemical Effects of Intermittent, Excessive Sugar Intake”Neuroscience Biobehavioral Review32, no. 1(2008): 20–39.
JohnsonP. M. and KennyP. J.“Dopamine D2 Receptors in Addiction-Like Reward Dysfunction and Compulsive Eating in Obese Rats”Nature Neuroscience13, no. 5(2010): 635–641.
10.
Id.
11.
VolkowN. D., “Overlapping Neuronal Circuits in Addiction and Obesity: Evidence of Systems Pathology”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society363, no. 1507(2008): 3191–3200.
12.
TangD. W., “Food and Drug Cues Activate Similar Brain Regions: A Meta-Analysis of Functional MRI Studies”Physiology & Behavior106, no. 3(2012): 317–324.
13.
SticeE., “Relation of Obesity to Consummatory and Anticipatory Food Reward”Physiology & Behavior97, no. 5(2009): 551–560.
14.
GoldM. S.Frost-PinedaK. and JacobsW. S.“Overeating, Binge Eating, and Eating Disorders as Addictions”Psychiatric Annals33, no. 2(2003): 117–12215.
15.
FriedmanL. M., A History of American Law: Third Edition (New York: Touchtone, 2005): at XII.
16.
LudwigD.PetersonK. and GortmakerS.“Relation between Consumption of Sugar Sweetened Drinks and Childhood Obesity: A Prospective, Observational Study”The Lancet357, no. 9255(2001): 505–508.
17.
MurphyJ.“FDA's Added Sugars Study Prompts Complaints from Food Industry”Food Chemical News (London), August 10, 2012, at 1.
18.
StromS.“Pepsi and Coke to Post Calories of Drinks Sold in Vending Machines”New York Times, October 8, 2012.
19.
KysarD. A.“Preferences for Processes: The Process/Product Distinction and the Regulations of Consumer Choice”Harvard Law Review118, no. 2(2004):525–529. 20.
20.
BaborT., Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity Research and Public Policy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010): at 5.
21.
MenaF. and HobbsR.“Narcophobia: Drugs Prohibition and the Generation of Human Rights Abuses”Trends in Organized Crime13, no. 1(2010):60–74; SmithP.“Drugs, Morality, and the Law”Journal of Applied Philosophy19, no. 3(2002):233–244. 22.
22.
BrownellK., “Personal Responsibility and Obesity: A Constructive Approach to a Controversial Issue”Health Affairs29, no. 3(2010):3379–387. 23.
23.
DaumM.“A Feeding Frenzy”Los Angeles Times, March 3, 2011.
24.
LustigR. H., “Public Health: The Toxic Truth about Sugar”Nature482, no. 7383(2012):27–29; FTC CDC FDA and USDA, Interagency Working Group on Food Marketed to Children: Proposed Nutrition Principles, to Guide Industry Self-Regulatory Efforts, Project No. P094513”; SilvergladeB. and HellerI. R., Food Labeling Chaos the Case for Reform, (Washington, D.C.: Center for Science in the Public Interest: March 2010); see Cal. Educ. Code § 49431.5 (2006); and also Ackerman v. The Coca-Cola Co., No. 09-cv-0395, 2010 WL 2925955 (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 21, 2010).
25.
See SullivanK. M., The Interagency Working Group's Preliminary Proposed Nutrition Principles to Guide Industry Self-Regulatory Efforts: Constitutional Issues, Appendix A in: Comments of Viacom before the Federal Trade Commission (July 14, 2011), available at <http://www.ftc.gov/os/comments/foodmarketedchildren/07884-80045.pdf> (last visited January 3, 2013) (First Amendment concerns “would unquestionably invalidate” mandatory government restrictions on food marketing to children); but cf., AllisonG. D., Open Letter on the First Amendment and the Interagency Working Group Principles to FTC, CDC, FDA, USDA, and the White House, September 6, 2011, available at <http://changelabsolutions.org/sites/changelabsolutions.org/files/IWG_1ALawProfLetter_20111012.pdf> (last visited January 3, 2013) (Nutrition principles, which are designed to guide industry self-regulatory efforts, do not restrain or compel anyone's speech.)