Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Referred to as “the prime animator of space,” light is a subject of broad application within the environmental design disciplines (Ching, 1987, p. 126). A scan of the literature demonstrates the diverse contexts in which light is studied. Recently, scholars posit that light is most often applied to an interior design solution as a functional additive rather than considered first as an essential design element along with form, color, texture, and others. This raises the question of how designers’, educators’, and students’ approaches to designing with light might be redefined to regard light as a significant contributor to spatial compositions.

The purpose of this study was to test a new framework for understanding light as a design element. It did so by measuring whether light can be perceived through analogy to language. Suggesting that language and design are analogous in that they are both governed by rules of syntax—the orderly and systematic arrangement of parts—this study used language as a model for investigating the role of light in spatial compositions.

Findings are presented from an exploratory study in which upper–level interior design students were asked to respond to a series of photographs of compositions of light. An instrument was designed to measure participants’ perception of light in four primary linguistic roles: noun, verb, adjective, and adverb. Preliminary findings suggest that the linguistic model may be an effective analogy for exploring light's role as a compositional element in interior space.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abel

. (1980). The language analogy in architectural theory and criticism. Architectural Association Quarterly, 12(3), 39–47.

Ando

, & Pare

. (2000). The colours of light. London: Phaidon Press Limited.

Benzel

. (1998). The room in context. New York: McGraw–Hill.

Boyce

P. R

. (2004). Lighting research for interiors: The beginning of the end or the end of the beginning. Lighting Research Technology, 36, 283–294.

Broadbent

. (1980). The deep structure of architecture. In Broadbent

, Bunt

, & Jencks

(Eds.), Signs, symbols, and architecture (pp. 119–168). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Brown

N. C

. (2004). Aesthetic composition and the language of light. Journal of Interior Design, 30(3), 8–22.

Casakin

H. P

. (2007). Metaphors in design problem solving: Implications for creativity. International Journal of Design, 1(2), 21–33.

Casakin

H. P.

, & Goldschmidt

. (2000). Reasoning by visual analogy in design problem–solving: The role of guidance. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27, 105–119.

Ching

F. D. K

. (1987). Interior design illustrated. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

10.

Chomsky

. (1975). The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum Press.

11.

Chomsky

. (2000). The architecture of language. ( Mukherji

, Patnaik

B. N.

& Agnihotri

R. K.

, Eds.). New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.

12.

Flynn

J. E

. (1988). Lighting–design decisions as interventions in human visual space. In Nasar

J. L.

(Ed.), Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research and applications (pp. 156–170). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Goldschmidt

, & Smolkov

. (2006). Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies, 27, 549–569.

14.

Hendrick

, Martyniuk

, Spencer

T. J.

, & Flynn

J. E

. (1977). Procedures for investigating the effect of light on impression: Simulation of a real space by slides. Environment and Behavior, 9, 491–510.

15.

Holl

, & Cobb

G. T

. (1999). The chapel of St. Ignatius. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

16.

Kesner

. (1997). Analysis of the museum lighting environment. Journal of Interior Design, 23(2), 28–41.

17.

Kilmer

, & Kilmer

W. O

. (1992). Designing interiors. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

18.

Klammer

, & Schulz

. (1992). Analyzing English grammar. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

19.

Malnar

J. M.

, & Vodvarka

. (1992). The interior dimension. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

20.

Marks

L. E

. (1982). Synesthetic perception and poetic metaphor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8(1), 15–23.

21.

Marks

L. E

. (1996). On perceptual metaphors. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 11(1), 39–66.

22.

McCoy

J. M.

, & Evans

. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 409–426.

23.

Meier

. (1997). Light as a transient medium. Architectural Design, 67, 54–59.

24.

Millet

. (1996). Light revealing architecture. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

25.

Moran

. (1990). Task lighting for the work surface: The problem of reflected glare. Journal of Interior Design Education and Research, 16(1), 5–10.

26.

Park

N.–K.

, & Farr

C. A

. (2007). The effects of lighting on consumers’ emotions and behavioral intentions in a retail environment: A cross–cultural comparison. Journal of Interior Design, 33(1), 17–32.

27.

Plummer

. (1987). Poetics of light. Tokyo: a + u Publishing.

28.

Rowe

P. G

. (1987). Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

29.

Scarfo

. (2006). The analogy. Unpublished manuscript.

30.

Theodorson

. (2006, April). Loving light: At the intersection of design and technology. Paper presented at the National Conference on the Beginning Design Student, Ames, Iowa.

31.

Veitch

, & Gifford

. (1996). Assessing beliefs about lighting effects on health, performance, mood, and social behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28, 446–470.

Perceptions of Light–Space Compositions: Is Light like Language?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References