AlexanderC. (2003). The luminous ground: The nature of order, book 4. Berkeley, CA: Center for Environmental Structure.
3.
AndersonB., HoneyP., & DudekM. (2007). Interior design's social compact: The missing aspect of our quest for professional legitimacy. In EvansP and TurpinJ.C. (Eds.), The Proceedings of the International Interior Design Educators Council Conference. Austin, TX (pp. 91–98). Indianapolis, In: Interior Design Education Council.
4.
Artists & Entertainers. (2007, May 14). Time Magazine, 169, 128–150.
BernsteinR. (1976). The restructuring of social and political theory. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
7.
BoyerE. & MitgangL. (1996). Building community: A new future for architecture education and practice. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advance of Teaching.
8.
BrooksD. (2007a, April 15). The age of Darwin. The New York Times, p. 14.
9.
BrooksD. (2007b, February 18). Human nature redux. The New York Times, p. 12.
10.
BurbankL. (2007, November 7). Birth of a meaty new taste. National Public Radio. Retrieved January 20, 2008, from http://www.npr.org/
11.
CrossN. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49–55.
12.
DaveyJ., & BeazleyM. (2007). Educating design intuition: A survey of problem solving methods used in architecture and interior design studios. Proceedings of the Design Communication Association, USA, 61–69.
13.
De BottonA. (2008). The architecture of happiness. New York: Vintage.
HavenhandL. (2004). A view from the margin: Interior design. Design Issues, 20(4), 32–42.
25.
HillC., & MatthewsC. (2007a). Sex, femininity, & the language of interior design. In EvansP and TurpinJ. C. (Eds.), The Proceedings of the 2007 International Interior Design Educator's Council Conference. Austin, TX. (pp. 243–250). Indianapolis, In: Interior Design Education Council.
26.
HillC., & MatthewsC. (2007b). What's wrong with pretty?Journal of Interior Design, 32(3), 11–14.
27.
HumeD. (2006). An enquiry concerning human understanding. BeauchampD. (Ed.). (The Clarendon Edition of the Works of David Hume). New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Interior Design Continuing Education Council. (2006). IDCEC presenter's manual for continuing education presentations and programs 2006. Retrieved July 5, 2007, from http://www.idcec.org/pdfs/PresentersGuideWeb.pdf
29.
KantI. (1951) Critique of judgment. New York: Hafner.
30.
KnoopA. (n.d.). History of the interiors committee. The American Institute of Architects Knowledge Communities. Retrieved January 15, 2008, from http://www.aia.org/int_history
31.
LehrerJ. (2007). Proust was a neuroscientist. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
32.
LevyR. (1990). Design education: Time to reflect. Design Issues, 7(1), 42–52.
33.
MargolinV. (1998). The multiple tasks of design research. In No guru, no method? (pp. 43–47). Helsinki, Finland: University of Art and Design.
MartinC. (2007). Interior design from practice to profession. Washington, DC: American Society of Interior Designers.
36.
National Council for Interior Design Qualification. (2008). NCIDQ definition of interior design. Retrieved January 28, 2008, from http://ncidq.org/who/definition.htm
37.
NewtonI. (1999, 1687, 1713, 1726). Philosophiae Nataralis Principia mathematica. TransI. CohenA.Whitman. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Park–GatesS., PopovL., IshamD., KaupM., SweetR., MendozaH., et al. (2008). The value of including creative endeavors in the tenure and promotion process. A draft submitted to the committee. Interior Design Educator's Council.
Scientists & Thinkers. (May 14, 2007). Time Magazine, 169(20), 106–124.
48.
SimonH. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49.
Van der RyneS. (2005). Design for life. Layton, UT: Gibbs Smith.
50.
Van der RyneS. (2007). Surpassability: The integral age and resilient society. In Keynote speech at the 2007 Environmental Design and Research Association Conference, Sacramento, CA.
51.
Van DoesburgT. (1923). Towards a collective construction. De Stijl. Quoted by N. Cross. Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Design Issues, 17(3), 48–55.
52.
WangD. & GroatL. (2002). Architectural research methods. New York: Wiley and Sons.
53.
WaxmanL. & ClemonsS. (2007). Student perceptions: Debunking television's portrayal of interior design. Journal of Interior Design, 32(2), v–xi.
54.
WofflinH. (1964). Renaissance and baroque. New York: Fontana Paperbacks.
55.
ZeiselJ. (2006). Inquiry by design: Environment/behavior/neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape, and planning. New York: W.W. Norton.