The privacy needs of older adults were investigated in relation to older adults’ adjustment to congregate living environments, as were the ways in which older adults regulate their privacy via environmental and behavioral mechanisms. Structured interviews were conducted with 71 adults residing in assisted living and independent living settings. Results revealed that older adults in these two settings differed in their use of environmental and behavioral mechanisms when regulating their privacy in these living spaces. Independent living residents achieved more privacy than assisted living residents. Older adults who felt crowded reported lower personal and overall adjustment than older adults whose achieved privacy level was greater than desired, or than those whose privacy level was optimized. It is suggested that in addition to facility policy and staff protocols, space planning and the manipulation of design elements may decrease perceived crowding and increase adjustment to the living environments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltmanI. (1975). The environment and social behavior. Monterey, CA : Brooks/Cole.
2.
ApplegateM. (1994). Personal privacy and interactional patterns in a nursing home. Journal of Aging Studies, 8, 413–433.
3.
AtchleyR. C. (1989). A continuity theory of normal aging. The Gerontologist, 29(2), 183–190.
4.
CarncossC. (2005). Independent housing for seniors: Design that is affordable, marketable, and allows aging–in–place. In ChaudhuryH. (Ed.). Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association (pp. 173). Edmond, OK : Environmental Design Research Association.
5.
CohenU. & WeismanG. (1990). Experimental design to maximize autonomy for older adults with cognitive impairments. Generations, 14(Suppl.), 75–78.
6.
Diaz MooreK. (2002). Observed affect in a dementia day center: Does the physical setting matter?Alzheimer's Care Quarterly, 3(1), 67–73.
7.
DicksonJ., ShroyerJ., EliasJ. W., HuttonJ. T. & GentryG. M. (2001). The effect of selected residential carpet and pad on the balance of healthy older adults. Environment and Behavior, 33(2), 279–295.
8.
DobbsD. (2004). The adjustment to a new home. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 18(1), 51–71.
9.
FirestoneI. J., LichtmanC. M. & EvansJ. R. (1980). Privacy and solidarity: Effects of nursing home accommodations on environmental perceptions and sociability preferences. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 11(3), 229–241.
10.
GibsonJ. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston : Houghton Mifflin.
GignacM. A. M., CottC., & BadleyE. M. (2000). Adaptation to chronic illness and disability and its relationship to perceptions of independence and dependence. Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55, 362–372.
13.
GilderbloomJ. I. & MarkhamJ. P. (1996). Housing modification needs of the disabled elderly: What really mattersEnvironment and Behavior, 28(4), 512–535.
14.
HansenK., MahoneyJ. & PaltaM., (1999). Risk factors for lack of recovery of ADL independence after hospital discharge. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 47(3), 360–366.
15.
HarrisP. B. (1994). Privacy regulation and place attachment: Predicting attachments to a student family housing facility. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Utah.
16.
HarrisP. B., BrownB. B., & WernerC. M. (1996). Privacy regulation and place attachment: Predicting attachments to a student family housing facility. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 287–301.
17.
HigginsE. T. (1987). Self–discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.
18.
JenkinsD. I., CantwellM., QuentinM. C., JenkinsA. L., & DraughnP. S. (1997). Housing for Louisiana's poor, rural elderly. Housing and Society, 24(2), 58–73.
19.
KayaN. & WeberM. J. (2003). Privacy regulation and college adjustment: A comparison of American and Turkish freshmen living in residence halls. College Student Journal, 37(1), 79–92.
20.
LangJ. (1993). Creating architectural theory: The role of the behavioral sciences in environmental design. New York : Van Nostrand Reinhold.
21.
LeporeM., BallM. M., WhittingtonF. J., PerkinsM. M., CornellB. R., KingS. V., et al. (2003). Homelikeness in assisted living facilities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Sociological Society, New Orleans, LA .
22.
MitchellJ. M. & KempB. J. (2000). Quality of life in assisted living homes: A multidimensional analysis. Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55, 117–127.
23.
MorganD. G. & StewartN. J. (1999). The physical environment of special care units: Needs of residents with dementia from the perspective of staff and family caregivers. Qualitative Health Research, 9(1), 105–118.
24.
NamaziK. H., EckertJ. K., RosnerT. T., & LyonS. (1991). The meaning of home for the elderly in pseudo–familial environments. Adult Residential Care Journal, 5(2), 81–96.
25.
Noell–WaggonerE. (2002). Light: An essential intervention for Alzheimer's Disease. Alzheimer's Care Quarterly, 3(4), 343–352.
26.
PascarellaE. T. & TerenziniP. T. (1980). Predicting freshmen persistence and voluntary dropout decisions from a theoretical model. Journal of Higher Education, 15(1), 60–75.
27.
PerrittM. R., McCuneS. L., & NunerJ. E. (2000). Programming for alzheimer's disease: A New Perspective. ISdesigNet Retrieved May 4, 2005 from http:www.isdesignet.com Magazine/June'00/idec.html.
28.
PetronioS. & KovachS. (1997). Managing privacy boundaries: Health providers’ perceptions of resident care in Scottish nursing homes. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 25(2), 115–132.
29.
PinetC. (1999). Distance and the use of social space by nursing home residents. Journal of Interior Design, 25(1), 1–15.
30.
RedfernM. S., MooreP. L., & YarskyC. M. (1997). The influence of flooring on standing balance among older persons. Human Factors, 39(3), 445–455.
31.
ReinardyJ. R. & KaneR. A. (2003). Anatomy of a choice: Deciding on assisted living or nursing home care in Oregon. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 22(1), 152–174.
32.
SchoppA., Leino–KilpiH., ValimakiM., DassenT., GasullM., LemonidouC., et al. (2003). Perceptions of privacy in the care of elderly people in five European countries. Nursing Ethics, 10(1), 39–47.
33.
VinselA., BrownB. B., AltmanI., & FossC. (1980). Privacy regulation, territorial displays, and effectiveness of individual functioning. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39, 1104–1115.
WisterA. V. (1985). Living arrangement choices among the elderly. Canadian Journal on Aging, 4(3), 127–144.
36.
WisterA. V. & BurchT. K. (1986). Attitudes of the elderly towards living arrangements: Conceptual and methodological issues. Paper presented at the IIASA Aging and the Family Conference, Sopron, Hungary .
37.
ZimmermanS., Gruber–BaldiniA. L., SloaneP. D., EckertJ. K., HebelJ. R., MorganL. A., et al. (2003). Assisted living and nursing homes: Apples and orangesGerontologist, 43(2), 107–117.
