Anna Marshall–Baker teaches in the Department of Interior Architecture at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro where she focuses on sustaining design and the reciprocal effects of environments and human development, particularly in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). With academic and practical experience in fine and commercial art, interior design, and psychology, she serves as a member of the Recommended Standards Consensus Committee for NICU Design, Interim Chair of the Sustaining Design Task Force for IDEC, Department Undergraduate Program Coordinator, Past–President of IDEC, and a reviewer for the Journal of Interior Design.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottA. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
2.
Association of Registered Interior Designers of Ontario. (2001). The interior design profession's body of knowledge: Its definition and documentation [Brochure]. Toronto : ARIDO.
3.
BronfenbrennerU. (1989). Ecological systems theory. In VastaR. (Ed.), Annals of child development: Theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues. (Vol. 6, pp. (87–251). Greenwich, CT : JAI Press.
4.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1995). Design and order in everyday life. In MargolinV. & BuchananR. (Eds.), The idea of design: A design issues reader (pp. 118–126). Cambridge, Massachusetts : The MIT Press.
5.
CunninghamA. & WilliamsP. (2003). De–centering the “big picture”: The origins of modern science and the modern origins of science. In HellyerM. (Ed.), The scientific revolution (pp. 218–246). Maiden, MA : Blackwell Publishing.
6.
GombrichE. H. (1996). On art and artists. In WoodfieldR. (Ed.), The essential Gombrich (pp. 65–81). London : Phaideon Press Limited.
7.
HasellM. J. (1993). Interior design theory and research: A paradigm shift. Journal of Interior Design, 19, 1.
8.
HildebrandtH. (2000). The IIDA Tatum paper: The rise of a profession; the evolution of interior design. Unpublished manuscript. University of Cincinnati.
9.
HingA. (1999, Summer). [Letter from the editor]. Record, 1.
10.
HuxtableA. L. (1993, February). Inventing American reality. Interior Design, 33–41.
11.
KaufmanD., MossD.M., & OsbornT.A. (Eds.). (2003). Beyond the boundaries: A transdisciplinary approach to learning and teaching. Westport, CT : Praeger.
12.
KaukasL. (September, 1997). The identity crisis of interior design: Our legacy to generation compleX. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the South Region of the Interior Design Educators Council, Pittsburgh.
13.
KekkonenH. (2003). Peace education. In JarvisP. & GriffinC. (Eds.), Adult and continuing education: Major themes in education (Vol. II: Liberal adult education (Part 2); pp. 306–313). New York : Routledge.
14.
KolbD. A. (2003). The process of experiential learning. In JarvisP. & GriffinC. (Eds.), Adult and continuing education: Major themes in education (Vol. IV, Teaching, learning, and research; pp. 159–179). New York : Routledge.
15.
LawsonT. (1984). Last exit: Painting. In WallisB. (Ed.), Art after modernism: Rethinking representation (pp. 153–165). New York : New Museum of Contemporary Art and David R. Godine, Inc.
16.
LengrandP. (2003). Lifelong education: Growth of a concept. In JarvisP. & GriffinC. (Eds.), Adult and continuing education: Major themes in education (Vol. I: Liberal adult education (Part 1); pp. 214–221). New York : Routledge.
17.
LernerR. M. (1986). Concepts and theories of human development. 2nd edition, New York : Random House.
18.
LindemanE. (2003). In terms of methods. In JarvisP. & GriffinC. (Eds.), Adult and continuing education: Major themes in education (Vol. IV, Teaching, learning, and research; pp. 63–70). New York : Routledge.
19.
LoosA. (1964). Ornament and crime. In ConradsU. (Ed.), Programs and manifestoes on 20th–century architecture (p. 19–24). Cambridge, MA : The MIT Press.
20.
MitchellC. T. (1993). Redefining design: From form to experience. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York .
21.
PetersM. (Ed.). (1999). After the disciplines: The emergence of culture studies. Westport. Connecticut : Bergin & Garvey.
22.
SameroffA. J. & ChandlerM. J. (1975). Reproductive risk and the continuum of child–caring casualty. In HorowitzF. D., HetheringtonM., Scarr–SalapatekS., & SiegelG. (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 4). Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
23.
SinclairB. (2003, November). A Canadian perspective on changing design education. Designlntelligence, 9(11), 6–8.
24.
SingermanH. (2002). Excellence and pluralism. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia.
25.
ToulminS. (2001). Return to reason. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
26.
van de VeldeH. (1964). Credo. In ConradsU. (Ed.), Programs and manifestoes on 20th –century architecture (p. 18). Cambridge, MA : The MIT Press.
27.
WallersteinI. (2004). The uncertainties of knowledge. Philadelphia : Temple University Press.
28.
WinklerD. R. (2001). Modernist paradigms never die, they just fade away. Design Issues, 17, 54–66.
