Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Letters offers a forum for sharing ideas, exchanging dialogue, and stimulating conversations and debate on critical issues that impact the designed environment as presented in the Perspectives section of the Journal of Interior Design. Identifying the “Body of Knowledge for interior design has recently emerged as a major issue being debated among professional, academic, and accrediting communities in North America and beyond. As such, two white papers on the topic were solicited and prepared by respected individuals who have been involved in the debate. The following letters were received in response to the positions presented and provide further insights for consideration as the conversation continues.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amin

& Cohendet

(2004). Architectures of knowledge: Firms, capabilities and communities. Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press.

Friedman

(1997). Design science and design education. In McGrory (Ed.) The challenge of complexity. Helsinki : UIAH.

Margolin

& Buchanan

(2000). The idea of design: A design issues reader. Cambridge, Massachusetts : The MIT Press.

Mitchell

C. T.

(1993). Redefining Ddesigning: From form to experience. New York : Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Nelson

& Stolterman

(2004). The design say: Intentional change In an unpredictable world; Foundations and fundamentals of design competence. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey : Educational Technological Publications.

Rengel

(2003) Shaping interior space. New York : Fairchild Books.

Vaikla–Poldma

(2003). An investigation of learning and teaching practices in an interior design class: An interpretive and contextual inquiry. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Montreal: McGill University.