We propose that the time is right to consider a transformation of Interior Design education. As Interior Design educators, administrators, practitioners, and leaders, we have been active participants in the progress made by the profession and the evolution of Interior Design education. With this in mind, and ever conscious of our continued commitment to the future of Interior Design, we present this treatise for consideration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottA. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
2.
BoyerE., & MitgangL. (1996). Building community: A new future for architecture education and practice. Princeton : The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
3.
DrabT. (2002). It's all in a name. Paper presented at NeoCon. Chicago : Mart Services.
4.
International Interior Design Association Foundation. (2002). A study of interior design: Analysis of needs of practice and implications for education (2001). Chicago : Author.
5.
KlayW. E., BrowerR., & WilliamsB. (2001). A community–oriented model of academic professionalism. Metropolitan Universities: An International Forum, 12 (3), 41–50.
6.
MartinC. (1998). Professionalization: Architecture, interior decoration, and interior design as defined by Abbott. Master's thesis, Department of Design, Housing, and Apparel, University of Minnesota.
7.
PlaterW. (1999) Habits of living: Engaging the campus as citizen one scholar at a time. In BringleR.G., MaiE.A. by, & GamesR. (Eds.). Colleges and universities as citizens. Needham Heights, MA : Allyn and Bacon.
8.
WatsonS., GuerinD., & GinthnerD. (In press). Educators and practice: How to stay current. Journal of Interior Design.
9.
WangDavid, (n.d.). Content, praxial and cross–cultural interdisciplinarity in design education. Unpublished paper. Interdisciplina.