Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

The focus of this study was to develop a methodology for the assessment of the environmental preferences of 10–year–old children for public interior spaces. A pilot study using the methodology developed was conducted on 31 10–year old children.

Research Design

The methodology developed included three instruments: a Slide Preference Test to determine overall preference; a Semantic Differential Scale to determine influential factors in defining preference; and the use of the School–Age Temperament Inventory (McClowry, 1995) to determine the relationship between temperament and preference.

Analysis

Data from the pilot study were analyzed using descriptive statistics, factor, and cluster analysis, and T–tests to determine overall preference and the relationship that gender, temperament, or room function has with preference.

Key Findings

Children prefer spaces that are visually rich. Further, it appears that preference for interior spaces is related to the concepts of comfort, safeness, and friendliness. Minor differences in preference were found based on gender, while the pilot study revealed more significant differences in preference based on temperament.

Conclusion

Based on the findings of the pilot study, some revisions in the methodology are recommended. With these minor changes, the methodology will be ready for use on a broader and more diverse population.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abello

R. P.

, & Bernaldez

F. G.

(1986). Landscape preference and personality. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 19–28.

Balling

J. D.

, & Falk

J. H.

(1982). Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behavior, 14, 5–27.

Bernaldez

F. G.

, Gallardo

, & Abello

R. P.

(1987). Children's landscape preferences: From rejection to attraction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 7, 169–176.

Boschetti

M. A.

(1987). Memories of childhood homes: Some contributions of environmental autobiography to interior design education and research. Journal of Interior Design Education and Research, 13(2), 27–36.

Cohen

, & Trostle

(1988). Choice and stability of young children's preferences for physical–environmental setting characteristics. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 187–191.

Cohen

, & Trostle

(1990). Young children's preferences for school–related physical–environment setting characteristics. Environment and Behavior, 22, 753–766.

Devlin

A. S.

(1994). Children's housing style preferences: Regional, socio–economic, sex, and adult comparisons. Environment and Behavior, 26, 527–559.

Di Vesta

F. J.

(1969). Developmental patterns in the use of modifiers as modes of conceptualization. In Snider

J. G.

& Osgood

C. E.

, (Eds.), Semantic differential technique: A sourcebook (pp. 348–376). Chicago : Aldine Publishing Co.

Dovey

(1985). Home and homelessness. In Altman

& Werner

C. M.

, (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research, Vol. 8. Home environments (pp. 33–64). New York : Plenum Press.

10.

Forman

G. E.

, & Kuschner

D. S.

(1977). The child's construction of knowledge: Piaget for teaching children. Monterey, CA : Brooks/Cole.

11.

Groves

, & Mason

(1993). The relationship between preference and environment in the school playground. Children's Environments, 10 (1), 52–59.

12.

Hall

, Purcell

A. T.

, Thorne

, & Metcalfe

(1976). Multidimensional scaling analysis of interior, designed spaces. Environment and Behavior, 8, 595–610.

13.

Hershberger

R. G.

, & Cass

R. C.

(1974). Predicting user responses to buildings. In Davis

, (Ed.), Man–environment interaction: Evaluations and applications, Part II (pp. 117–134). Stroudsburg, PA : Dowden, Hutchinson, & Ross.

14.

Kaplan

, & Kaplan

(1982). Cognition and environment. New York, NY : Praeger Publishers.

15.

Kasmar

J. L.

(1970). The development of a usable lexicon of environmental descriptors. Environment and Behavior, 2, 153–169.

16.

Keul

(1991). Housing wishes of Australian school children. Children's Environments Quarterly, 8(2), 46–54.

17.

Ladd

F. C.

(1972). Black youths view their environments: Some views of housing. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 38(2), 108–116.

18.

Lawrence

R. J.

(1987). What makes a house a home? Environment and Behavior, 19, 154–168.

19.

Lennard

H. L.

, & Lennard

S. H. C.

(1992). Children in public places: Some lessons from European cities. Children's Environments, 9(2), 37–47.

20.

McClowry

S. G.

(1995). The development of the School–Age Temperament Inventory. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 41(3), 271–285.

21.

Mehrabian

, & Russell

J. A.

(1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.

22.

Miller

(1986). Designing the home for children: A need–based approach. Children's Environments Quarterly, 3(1), 55–62.

23.

Rafferty

, & Shinn

(1991). The impact of homelessness on children. American Psychologist, 46, 1170–1179.

24.

Rivlin

L. G.

(1990). Home and homelessness in the lives of children. Child and Youth Services, 14(1), 5–17.

25.

Sanoff

(1993). Designing a responsive school environment. Children's Environments, 10(2), 140–153.

26.

Scott

S. C.

(1992). Visual attributes related to preference in interior environments. Journal of Interior Design, 18(1&2), 7–16.

27.

Simmons

D. A.

(1994). Urban children's preferences for nature: Lessons for environmental education. Children's Environments, 11 (3), 194–203.

28.

Steele

(1981). A sense of place. Boston : CBI Publishing.

29.

Zigler

E. F.

, & Finn–Stevenson

(1987). Children: Development and social issues. Lexington, MA : D. C. Health.

30.

Zube

E. H.

, Pitt

D. G.

, & Anderson

T. W.

(1974). Perception and measurement of scenic resources in the Southern Connecticut River Valley. Amherst, MA : University of Massachusetts.