An exploratory study was undertaken to examine the role of personal possessions in older people's attachment to place.
Research Design
A qualitative research strategy was selected to gather descriptive data and to capture meanings of personal experience (Rowles and Reinharz, 1988). Over a ten–month period, multiple, in–depth interviews were conducted with a small sample of volunteer subjects in their homes.
Analysis
A phenomenological method of analysis based on procedures outlined by Giorgi (1985) was followed.
Key Findings
A complex pattern of attachment to possessions was revealed through discovery of two interpretive themes, connection/extension and continuity/discontinuity, that provide deeper understanding of the person–place phenomenon as experienced by the older person.
Conclusion
The study validates and extends other studies showing relationships between personal possessions and identity of older people. Attachment of a sense of self to micro–elements of the physical environment has crucial implications for place–making in the older person's residential setting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltmanI., & LowS. M. (1992). Place attachmentNew York : Plenum Press.
2.
BelkR. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168.
3.
BelkR. (1992). Attachment to possessions. In AltmanI. & LowS. M. (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 37–62). New York : Plenum Press.
4.
BoschettiM. A. (1985). The importance of nature in older people's attachment to the residential setting. [Abstract]. OrlandB. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture (pp. 241–243). Urbana, IL .
5.
BoschettiM. A. (1986). Emotional attachment to homes past and present: Continuity of experience and integrity of self in old age. In SailleD. (Ed.), Architecture in cultural change (pp. 31–44). Lawrence, KS : Built Form and Culture Studies, University of Kansas.
6.
BoschettiM. A. (1990). Reflections on home: Implications for housing design for elderly persons. Housing and Society17(3), 57–65.
7.
CsikszentmihalyiM., & Rochberg–HaltonE. (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the selfNew York : Cambridge University Press.
8.
DetznerD. F., BellL., & StumM. (1991). The meaning of home and possessions to elderly public housing residents displaced by fire. Housing and Society18(2), 3–12.
9.
EricksonE. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York : W. W. Norton.
10.
GiorgiA. (1985). Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In GiorgiA. (Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 8–22). Pittsburgh : Duquesne University Press.
11.
GiulianiM. V. (1991). Towards an analysis of mental representations of attachment to the home. The Journal of Architectural and Planning Research8(2), 133–146.
12.
GlaserB. G., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative researchChicago : Aldine.
13.
HasellM. J., & BenhamouR. (1988). Interior design: A Dynamic Systems view. Journal of Interior Design Education and Research14(2), 13–22.
14.
HowellS. C. (1980). Designing for agingCambridge, MA : The MIT Press.
15.
HowellS. C. (1983). The meaning of place in old age. In RowlesG. & OhtaR. J. (Eds.), Aging and milieu (pp. 97–107). New York : Academic Press.
16.
KaylmunM. (1985). The prevalence of factors influencing decisions among elderly women concerning household possessions during relocation. Journal of Housing for the Elderly3(3), 81–99.
17.
KaufmanS. R. (1994). In–depth interviewing. In GubriumJ. F. & SankarA. (Eds.), Qualitative Methods in Aging Research (pp. 123–136). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.
18.
LoustauJ. (1988). A theoretical base for interior design: A review of four approaches from related fields. Journal of Interior Design Education and Research14(1), 3–8.
19.
LowenthalD. (1975). Past time, present place: Landscape and memory. The Geographical Review, 65, 1–36.
20.
LynchK. (1972). What time is this place? Cambridge, MA : The MIT Press.
21.
McCrackenA. (1987). Emotional impact of possession loss. Journal of Gerontological Nursing13(2), 14–19.
22.
MillardP. H., & SmithC. S. (1981). Personal belongings—a positive effectThe Gerontologist, 21(1), 85–90.
23.
RedfootD. L., & BackK. W. (1988). The perceptual presence of the life course. International Journal of Aging and Human Development27(3), 155–170.
24.
RelphE. (1976). Place and placelessnessLondon : Pion Limited.
25.
RobertsE. (1977, June 20). Mainstreams, our emotional investment in lifeless things. The National Observer, p. 11.
26.
RowlesG. (1978). Exploring the geographical experience of older peopleBoulder, CO : Westview Press.
27.
RowlesG. (1984). Aging in rural environments. In AltmanI., LawtonP., & WohlwillJ. (Eds.), Elderly people and the environment (pp. 129–157). New York : Plenum Press.
28.
RowlesG., & OhtaR. J. (1983). Emergent themes and new directions: Reflection on aging and milieu research. In RowlesG. & OhtaR. J. (Eds.), Aging and Milieu (pp. 231–239). New York : Academic Press.
29.
RowlesG., & ReinharzS. (1988). Qualitative gerontology: Themes and challenges. In ReinharzS. & RowlesG. (Eds.), Qualitative gerontology (pp. 3–33). New York : Springer Publishing.
30.
RubinsteinR. L. (1987). The significance of personal objects to older people. Journal of Aging Studies1(3), 225–238.
31.
RubinsteinR. L. (1988). Stories told: In–depth interviewing and the structure of its insights. In ReinharzS. & RowlesG. (Eds.), Qualitative gerontology (pp. 128–146). New York : Springer Publishing.
32.
RubinsteinR. L. (1989). The home environments of older people: A description of the psychosocial processes linking person to place. Journal of Gerontology44(2), S45–S53.
33.
RubinsteinR., & ParmeleeP. (1992). Attachment to place and the representation of the life course by the elderly. In AltmanI. & LowS. (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 139–163). New York : Plenum Press.
34.
SearlesH. F. (1960). The nonhuman environment in normal development and in schizophreniaNew York : International Universities Press.
35.
ShermanE., & NewmanE. S. (1977). The meaning of cherished personal possessions for the elderly. Journal of Aging and Human Development8(2), 181–192.
36.
TuanY. F. (1975). Place: An experiential perspective. The Geographical Review, 65, 151–165.
37.
WapnerS., DemickJ., & RedondoJ. P. (1990). Cherished possessions and adaptation of older people to nursing homes. International Journal of Aging and Human Development31(3), 219–235.
