We present an integrated framework for measuring product development performance. The framework consists of a three stage model for exploring the relationships between metrics used by design, manufacturing, marketing functions, and overall commercial success. Using a cross‐sectional survey of 383 product development professionals working on 38 product development projects in the high‐tech electronic assembled goods manufacturing sector, we provide empirical evidence of the proposed framework. The findings indicate that in the high‐tech manufacturing sector (1) commercial success of new product development projects is primarily determined by market share, (2) gain in market share is primarily driven by lower unit cost and not by technical performance, and (3) reduction in unit cost is primarily driven by the increased speed of new product development and not by the R&D budget. The study failed to identify any significant association between R&D budget and technical performance, and development speed and technical performance.
AakerD. A.DeyG. S.. 1986. The perils of high‐growth markets. Strategic Management Journal7(5) 409–421.
2.
BacharachS. B.1989. Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review14(4) 496–515.
3.
BalachanderS.SrinivasanK.. 1998. Modifying customer expectation of price decreases for a durable product. Management Science44(6) 776–786.
4.
BoyerK. K.VermaR.. 2000. Multiple raters in survey‐based operations management research: A review and tutorial. Production and Operations Management9(2) 128–140.
5.
BrownS. L.EisenhardtK. M.. 1995. Product development: Past research. Present Findings and Future Directions. Academy of Management Review4(2) 343–78.
6.
BuzzellR. D.GaleB. T.SultanR. M.. 1975. Market share—The key to profitability. Harvard Business Review53(1) (January–February) 97–106.
7.
CarrilloJ. E.2005. Industry clockspeed and the pace of new product development. Production and Operations Management14(2), 125–141.
8.
ChiesaV.ManziniR.TolettiG.. 2002. Standard‐setting process: Evidence from two case studies. R&D Management32(5) 431–450.
9.
ChristensenC. M.1992a. Exploring the limits of the technology S‐curve. Part I: Component technologies. Production and Operations Management1(4) 334–357.
10.
ChristensenC. M.1992b. Exploring the limits of the technology S‐curve. Part II: Architectural technologies. Production and Operations Management1(4) 338–66.
11.
ClarkK. B.FujimotoT.. 1991. Product development performance. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
12.
ClarkK. B.1989. Project scope and project performance: The effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development. Management Science35(10) 1247–1264.
13.
CohenM. A.EliashbergJ.HoT. H.. 2000. An analysis of several new product performance metrics. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management2(4) 337–349.
14.
CookV. J.Jr.1985. The net present value of market share. Journal of Marketing49(3) 49–63.
15.
CooperR. G.KleinschmidtE.. 1987. New products: What separates winners from losers. Journal of Product Innovation Management4(3) 169–84.
16.
CooperR.ChewW. B.AvishiB.. 1996. Control tomorrow's costs through today's designs. Harvard Business Review74(1) (January–February), 88–98.
17.
CraigA.HartS.. 1993. Dimensions of success in new product development in Perspectives on Marketing Management, Volume 3, Chapter 10. BakerM.J. (ed.), John M. Wiley & Sons, Ltd, London, United Kingdom, 207–243.
18.
CrawfordC. M.1992. The hidden costs of accelerated product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management9(3) 188–199.
19.
DeanJ. W.Jr,SusmanG. I.. 1989. Organizing for manufacturable design. Harvard Business Review67(1) (January–February) 28–32.
20.
DroletA. L.MorrisonD. G.. 2001. Do we really need multiple‐item measures in service research?Journal of Service Research3(3) 196–204.
21.
DumaineB.1989. How managers succeed through speed. Fortune February1354–59.
22.
EbelR. L.1951. Estimation of the reliability of ratings. Psychometrika16407–424.
23.
EdwardsC.IhlwanM.EngardoP.. 2003. The Samsung way. Business Week 3837 June1656–62.
24.
EisenhardtK. M.BrownS. L.. 1998. Time pacing: Competing in markets that won't stand still. Harvard Business Review76(2) 59–69.
25.
EisenhardtK. M.TabriziB. N.. 1995. Accelerating adaptive process: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly40(1) 84–110.
26.
EisenhardtK.1989. Building theory from case study research. Academy of Management Review14(4) 532–550.
27.
FineC. H.2000. Clockspeed‐based strategies for supply chain design. Production and Operations Management9(3) 213–221.
28.
FineC. H.1998. Clock speed—Winning industry control in the age of temporary advantage. Perseus Books, Reading, Massachusetts.
29.
FingerS.DixonJ. R.. 1989a. A review of research in mechanical enginnering design, Part I: Descriptive, prescriptive, and computer‐based models of design processes. Research Engineering Design1(1) 51–68.
30.
FingerS.DixonJ. R.. 1989b. A review of research in mechanical engineering design, Part II: Representations. Analysis, and design for the life cycle. Research Engineering Design1(2) 121–137.
31.
FinnR. H.1970. A note on estimating the reliability of categorical data. Educational & Psychological Measurement3071–76.
32.
FitzsimmonsJ. A.KouvelisP.MallickD. N.. 1991. Design strategy and its interface with manufacturing and marketing strategy: A conceptual framework. Journal of Operations Management10(3) 398–415.
33.
FlynnB. B.SaladinB.. 2001. Further evidence on the validity of the theoretical models underlying the Baldrige criteria. Journal of Operations Management19(6) 617–653.
34.
FlynnB. B.FlynnE. J.AmundsonS. D.SchroederR. G.. 1999. Product development speed and quality: A new set of synergies? in Perspectives in total quality, StahlM.J. (ed.), Blackwell, Oxford, United Kingdom.
35.
FosterR. N.LindenL. H.WhiteleyR. L.KantrowA. M.. 1985a. Improving the Return on R&D—I. Research ManagementVXX‐VIII(1) (January–February) 12–17.
36.
FosterR. N.LindenL. H.WhiteleyR. L.KantrowA. M.. 1985b. Improving the return on R&D—II. Research ManagementXX‐VIII(1) (March–April) 13–22.
37.
GeorgopoulosB. S.1986. Organizational structure, problem solving, and effectiveness. Jossey‐Bass Publishers, San Fancisco, California.
38.
GerwinD.BarrowmanN. J.. 2002. An evaluation of research on integrated product development. Management Science48(7) 938–953.
39.
GlickW. H.1985. Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review10(3) 601–616.
40.
GoldsteinH.2002. They might be giants. IEEE Spectrum39(9) (September) 43–48.
41.
GriffinA.1997. The effect of project and process characteristics on product development cycle time. Journal of Marketing ResearchXXXIV (Winter) 24–35.
42.
GriffinA.HauserJ. R.. 1996. Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management13(3) 191–215.
43.
GriffinA.PageA. L.. 1996. PDMA success measurement project: Recommended measures for product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management13(6) 478–496.
44.
GriffinA.PageA. L.. 1993. An interim report on measuring product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management10(4) 291–308.
45.
GriffinA.1993. Metrics for measuring product development cycle time. Journal of Product Innovation Management10(2) 112–125.
46.
GriffinA.HauserJ. R.. 1992. Patterns of communication among marketing engineering and manufacturing—A comparison between two new product teams. Management Science38(3) 360–373.
47.
GuptaA. K.WilemonD.. 1996. Changing patterns in industrial R&D management. Journal of Product Innovation Management13(6) 497–511.
48.
HauptmanO.HirjiK. K.. 1996. The influence of process concurrency on project outcomes in product development: An empirical study of cross‐functional teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management43(2) 153–164.
49.
HauserJ. R.KatzG. M.. 1998. Metrics: You are what you measure!European Management Journal16(5) 516–529.
50.
HauserJ. R.1998. Research development, and engineering metrics. Management Science44(12) 1670–1690.
51.
HausmanW. H.MontgomeryD. B.RothA. V.. 2002. Why should marketing and manufacturing work together? Some exploratory empirical results. Journal of Operations Management20(3) 241–59.
52.
HultinkE. J.RobbenH. S. J.. 1995. Measuring new product success: Differences that time perspective makes. Journal of Product Innovation Management12(5) 392–405.
53.
JacobsonR.AakerD. A.. 1985. Is market share all that it̂s cracked up to be?Journal of Marketing49(4) 11–22.
54.
JamesL. R.DemareeR. G.WolfG.. 1984. Estimating within‐group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology69(1) 85–98.
55.
JamesL. R.1982. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology67(2) 219–229.
56.
KhuranaA.RosenthalS. R.. 1997. Integrating the fuzzy front end of new product development. IEEE Engineering Management Review25(4) 35–49.
57.
KouvelisP.MallickD. N.MukhopadhyayS. K.. 1997. Dynamic interactions of design quality and pricing strategies over the product life cycle. Production and Operations Management6(4) 373–387.
58.
KozlowskiW. J.HattrupK.. 1992. A disagreement about within‐group agreement: Disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus. Journal of Applied Psychology77(2) 161–167.
59.
KrishnanV.LochC. H.. 2005. A retrospective look at the POM literature on innovation in product, process, project, and technology management. Production and Operations Management forthcoming.
60.
KrishnanV.UlrichK. T.. 2001. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Science47(1) 1–21.
61.
LaheyM. A.DowneyR. G.SaalF. A.. 1983. Interclass correlations: There's more than meets the eye. Psychological Bulletin93586–595.
62.
LochC.SteinL.TerwischC.. 1996. Measuring development performance in electronics industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management13(1) 3–20.
63.
MalhotraM.GroverV.. 1998. An assessment of survey research in POM: From constructs to theory. Journal of Operations Management16(4) 407–425.
64.
MendelsonH.PillaiR. R.. 1999. Industry clockspeed: Measurement and operational implications. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management1(1) 1–20.
65.
MeredithJ.1998. Building operations management theory through case and field research. Journal of Operations Management16(4) 441–454.
66.
MeyerM. H.TertzakianP.UtterbackJ. M.. 1997. Metrics for managing research and development in the context of the product family. Management Science43(1) 88–111.
67.
MeyerM. H.UtterbackJ. M.. 1995. Product development cycle time and commercial success. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management42(4) 297–303.
68.
Montoya‐WeissM. M.CalantoneR.. 1994. Determinants of new product performance: A review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management11(5) 397–417.
69.
PorterM. E.1980. Competitive strategy. Free Press, New York, New York.
70.
SmithP. G.ReinertsenD. G.. 1991. Developing products in half the time. Van Nostrand Reinhold Publishers, New York, New York.
71.
RosenthalS. R.TatikondaM. V.. 1993. Time management in new product development: Case study findings. IEEE Engineering Management Review21(3) 13–20.
72.
RosenthalS. R.1992. Effective product design and development. Business One Irwin, Homewood, Illinois.
73.
SchmennerR. W.SwinkM. L.. 1998. On theory in operations management. Journal of Operations Management17(1) 97–113.
SongX. M.ParryM. E.. 1997. The determinants of Japanese new product success. Journal of Marketing Research34 (Winter) 64–76.
76.
SprengR. A.MackenzieS. C.OlshavskyR. W.. 1996. A reexamination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing60(3) 15–32.
77.
StalkG.Jr.1988. Time—The next source of competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review66(4) (July–August) 41–51.
78.
SuttonR. I.StawB. M.. 1995. What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly40(3) 371–384.
79.
SzymanskiD. M.BharadwajS. G.. 1993. An analysis of the market share profitability relationship. Journal of Marketing57(3) 1–18.
80.
SwamidassP. M.1991. Empirical science: New frontier in operations management research. Academy of Management Review6(4) 793–814.
81.
SwamidassP.M.NewellW. T.. 1987. Manufacturing strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance: A path analytical model. Management Science33(4) 509–524.
82.
SwinkM.1999. Threats to new product manufacturability and the effects of development team integration processes. Journal of Operations Management17(6) 691–709.
83.
TakeuchiH.NonakaI.. 1986. The new product development game. Harvard Business Review64(1) (January–February), 137–146.
84.
TatikondaM. V.RosenthalS. R.. 2000. Successful implementation of product development projects: Balancing firmness and flexibility in the innovation process. Journal of Operations Management18(4) 401–425.
85.
TatikondaM. V.Montoya‐WeissM.2001. Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: The influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance. Management Science47(1) 151–172.
86.
UlrichK. T.EppingerS. D.. 1995. Product design and development. McGraw‐Hill, New York, New York.
87.
VickeryS. K.DrogeC.MarklandR. E.. 1997. Dimensions of manufacturing strength in furniture industry. Journal of Operations Management15(4) 315–330.
WhettenD. A.1989. What constitutes a theoretical contribution?Academy of Management Review14(4) 490–495.
91.
XieJ.SongX. M.StringfellowA.. 1998. Interfunctional conflict, conflict resolution styles and new product success: A four‐culture comparison. Management Science44(12) (Part 2) S192–S206.
92.
YinR. K.1981. Case study research. Sage Publishers, Beverly Hills, California.
93.
ZeithamlV. A.1988. Consumer perceptions of price quality, and value: A means‐end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing52(3) 2–22.
94.
ZirgerB. J.HartleyJ.. 1996. The effect of acceleration techniques on product development time. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management43(2) 143–152.
95.
ZirgerB. J.MaidiqueM.. 1990. A model of new product development: An empirical test. Management Science36(7) 867–883.
