An important aspect of supply chain management is the optimal configuration of the supplier base. We develop a model to determine optimal lot sizes and the optimal number of suppliers when the yield of the product delivered from each supplier is random. While small orders from a large number of suppliers can reduce yield uncertainty, fixed costs associated with each supplier provide a penalty for having too many suppliers. This is the key tradeoff addressed by our model. We look at the cases when the suppliers are identical as well as nonidentical.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnupindiR., and AkellaR. (1993), “Diversification Under Supply Uncertainty,”Management Science, 39, 8, 944–963.
2.
BurtD. N. (1989), “Managing Suppliers Up To Speed,”Harvard Business Review, July‐August, 127–135.
3.
Business Week (1993), “Cut Costs or Else,” March 22, 28–29.
4.
ChaseR. B., and AquilanoN. J. (1995), Production & Operurions Management, Richard D. Jrwin, Homewood, IL.
5.
ChiangC., and BentonW. C. (1994), “Sole Sourcing Versus Dual Sourcing Under Stochastic Demands and Lead Times,”Naval Research Logistics, 41, 609–624.
6.
GerchakY., and ParlarM. (1990), “Yield Randomness/Cost Tradeoffs and Diversification in the EOQ Model,”Naval Research Logistics, 37, 3, 341–354.
7.
HadleyG., and WhitinT. M. (1963), Analysis of lnventory Systems, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
8.
HamiltonD. P. (1993), “Sumitomo is Expected to Set Reopening on Semiconductor Plant for December,”The Wall Street Joumul, August 16, B4D.
9.
HayyaJ. C.ChristyD. P., and PanA. (1987), “Reducing Inventory Uncertainty: A Reorder Point System with Two Vendors,”Production and Inventory Management, 28, 2, 2nd Quarter, 43–48.
10.
HelperS. (1991), “How Much Has Really Changed Between U.S. Automakers and Their Suppliers,”Sloan Management Review, Summer, 15–28.
11.
HenigM., and GerchakY. (1990), “The Structure of Periodic Review Policies in the Presence of Random Yield,”Operations Research, 38, 4, 634–643.
12.
HenkoffR. (1994), “Delivering the Goods,”Fortune, November 28, 64–78.
13.
JacobsonG., and HillkirkJ. (1986), Xerox, American Samurai, MacMillan, New York.
14.
KelleP., and SilverE. (1990), “Safety Stock Reduction by Order Splitting,”Naval Research Logistics, 37, 5, 725–743.
15.
LauH., and ZhaoL. (1994), “Dual Sourcing Cost Optimization with Unrestricted Lead Time Distributions and Order‐Split Proportions,”IIE Transactions, 26, 5, September, 66–75.
16.
McMillanJ. (1990), “Managing Suppliers: Incentive Systems in Japanese and U.S. Industry,”California Management Review, 32, 4, Summer, 38–55.
17.
MoinzadehK., and LeeH. L. (1987), “A Continuous Review Inventory Model with Constant Resupply Time and Defective Items,”Naval Research Logistics, 34, 457–467.
18.
MoinzadehK., and MoinzadehK. (1989), “Approximate Order Quantities and Reorder Points for Inventory Systems where Order Quantities Arrive in Two Shipments,”Operations Research, 37, 2, 277–287.
19.
MoinzadehK., and NahmiasS. (1988), “A Continuous Review Model for an Inventory System with Two Supply Modes,”Management Science, 34, 6, 761–773.
20.
NahmiasS. (1997), Production and Operations Analysis Third Edition, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL.
21.
NahmiasS., and MoinzadehK. (1997), “Lot Sizing With Randomly Graded Yields,” working paper, Santa Clara University, forthcoming in Operations Research.
22.
PanA. C. (1991), “Multiple Sourcing: The Determination of Lead Times,”Operations Research Letters, 10, 1, 1–7.
23.
ParlarM., and GerchakY. (1989), “Control of a Production System with Variable Yield and Random Demand,”Computers and Operations Research, 16, 4, 315–324.
24.
ParlarM., and WangD. (1993), “Diversification Under Yield Randomness in Inventory Models,”European Journal of Operational Research, 66, 1, 52–64.
25.
PresuttiW. D.Jr. (1992), “The Single Source Issue: U.S., and Japanese Sourcing Strategies,”International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Winter, 2–9.
26.
RamaseshR. V.OrdJ. K.HayyaJ. C., and PanA. (1991), “Sole Versus Dual Sourcing in Stochastic Lead‐time (s, Q) Inventory Models,”Management Science, 37, 4, 428–443.
27.
SculliD., and WuS. Y. (1981), “Stock Control With Two Suppliers and Normal Lead Times,”Journal of the Operational Research Society, 32, 11, 1003–1009.
28.
ShihW. (1980), “Optimal Inventory Policies when Stockouts Result from Defective Products,”International Journal of Production Research, 18, 6, 677–686.
29.
SilverE. A. (1976), “Establishing the Order Quantities when the Amount Received is Uncertain,”INFOR, 14, 1, 32–39.
30.
TangK. (1988), “An Economic Model for Vendor Selection,”Journal of Quality Technology, 20, 81–89.
31.
TanB. W. (1990), “Using the Supplier Relationship to Develop the Support Industry,”OMEGA, 18, 151–158.
32.
TaylorA. (1994), “The Auto Industry Meets the New Economy,”Fortune, September, 52–60.
33.
Wall Street Journal (1991), “Supplier Struggle to Improve Quality As Big Firms Slash Their Vendor Rolls,” August 16, B1–B2.
34.
WelchJ. (1992), “The Bridge to Competitiveness, Building Supplier‐Customer Linkages,”Target, November‐ December, 17–29.
35.
WomackJ. P.JonesD. T., and RoosD. (1991), The Machine that Changed the World, Harper Perennial, New York.
36.
YanoC. A., and LeeH. L. (1995), “Lot Sizing with Random Yields: A Review,”Operations Research, 43, 2, 311–334.
