Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We consider an important topic from the traditional quality literature‐the impact of conformance quality of a manufactured product on the preventive maintenance costs to downstream users of this product. Folk wisdom supports the notion that higher conformance quality translates into lower maintenance costs (as well as other components of life‐cycle costs) for these users. We examine this proposition in some detail on the basis of a failure‐time model that relates conformance quality to reliability. We consider both repairable and nonrepairable items that are maintained by a block‐replacement or a minimal‐repair strategy. In addition to maintenance cycles and costs, we discuss the value of information to the user as to the actual production quality, and the value of inspection.

Keywords

CONFORMANCE QUALITY PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE TQM TPM BLOCK‐REPLACEMENT STRATEGY MINIMAL‐REPAIR STRATEGY

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdel‐Hameed

(1987), “Inspection and Maintenance Policies of Devices subject to Deterioration,” Advances in Applied Probability, 10, 4, 917–1031.

Barlow

and Hunter

L. C.

(1960), “Optimum Preventive Maintenance Policies,” Operations Research, 8, January, 90–100.

Block

H. W.

Borges

W. S.

, and Savits

T. H.

(1988), “A General Age Replacement Model with Minimal Repair,” Naval Research Logistics, 35, 5, 365–372.

Boland

P. J.

and Proschan

(1982), “Periodic Replacement with Increasing Minimal Repair Costs at Failure,” Operations Research, 30, 6, 1183–1189.

Chen

(1991), Product Quality and Warranty Cost, Ph.D. Thesis, School of Business Administration, University of Wisconsin‐Milwaukee.

Cléroux

Dubuc

, and Tilquin

(1979), “The Age Replacement Problem with Minimal Repair Costs,” Operations Research, 27, 6, 1158–1167.

Cox

D. R.

(1962), Renewal Theory, Methuen, London.

Deming

W. E.

(1982), Quality, Productivity and Competitive Position, MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Studies, Cambridge, MA.

Kackar

R. N.

(1986), “Taguchi's Quality Philosophy: Analysis and Comment,” Quality Progress, 19, 12, 21–29.

10.

Muth

E. J.

(1977), “An Optimal Decision Rule for Repair vs Replacement,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R‐26, 3, 179–181.

11.

Nakajima

(1988), Introduction to TPM: Total Productive Maintenance, Productivity Press, Portland, OR.

12.

Park

K. S.

(1979), “Optimal Number of Minimal Repairs Before Replacement,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R‐28, 2, 137–140.

13.

Ross

S. M.

(1983), Stochastic Processes, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

14.

Sahin

(1993), “Conformance Quality and Replacement Costs under Warranty,” Production and Operations Management, 2, 4, 242–261.

15.

Sahin

(1994), “Impact of Conformance Quality on Preventive Maintenance Cycles and Costs,” Transactions on Operational Research, 6, 27–42.

16.

Sahin

and Polatoglu

(1995), “Distributions of the Manufacturer's and User's Replacement Costs under Warranty,” Naval Research Logistics, forthcoming.

17.

Tilquin

and Ciéroux

(1975), “Periodic Replacement with Minimal Repair at Failure and Adjustment Costs,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 22, 2, 243–254.

MANUFACTURING QUALITY,RELIABILITY AND PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References