A resource‐based construct of manufacturing competence, termed strategic production competence, is examined with respect to its convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity. The construct evaluates manufacturing performance across a comprehensive domain of competitive priorities relative to item importance and performance. Data from an earlier study of furniture firms (n = 65) are used for statistical testing. The results establish the convergent and discriminant validity of strategic production competence and show that it is positively related to business performance.
BarneyJ. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,”Journal of Management, 17, 1, 99–100.
2.
CampbellD. T. and FiskeD. W. (1959), “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait‐Multimethod Matrix,Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
3.
ClevelandG.SchroederR. G., and AndersonJ. C. (1989), “A Theory of Production Competence,”Decision Sciences, 20, 4, 655–668.
4.
DeanR. H.GargeyaV. B., and McDougallP. P. (1990), “Manufacturing Strategy and Performance of the New Venture Firm,” in Manufacturing Strategy, the Research Agenda for the Next Decade, Proceedings of the Joint Industry University Conference on Manufacturing Strategy, EttlieJ. E.BursteinM. C., and FiegenbaumA. (eds.), Ann Arbor, Michigan, 53–64.
5.
DessG. S. and RobinsonR. B. (1984), “Measuring Organizational Performance in the Absence of Objective Measures,”Strategic Management Research, 5, 3, 265–273.
6.
FerdowsK. and De MeyerA. (1990), “Lasting Improvements in Manufacturing Performance: In Search of a New Theory,”Journal of Operations Management, 9, 2, 168–184.
7.
FlynnB. B.SakakibaraS.SchroederR. G.BatesK. A., and FlynnE. J. (1990), “Empirical Research Methods in Operations Management,”Journal of Operations Management, 9, 2, 250–284.
8.
HayesR. H., and WheelwrightS. C. (1984), Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
9.
RothA. V. and MillerJ. G. (1990), “Manufacturing Strategy, Manufacturing Strength, Managerial Success, and Economic Outcomes,” in Manufacturing Strategy, The Research Agenda for the Next Decade, Proceedings of the Joint Industry University Conference on Manufacturing Strategy, EttlieJ. E.BursteinM. C., and FiegenbaumA. (eds.), Ann Arbor, Michigan, 85–96.
10.
SchmittN.CoyleB. W., and SaariB. B. (1977) “Review and Critique of Analyses of Multitrait‐Multimethod Matrices,”Multivariate Behavior Research, 12, 447–448.
11.
SwamidassP. M., and NewellW. T. (1987), “Manufacturing Strategy, Environmental Uncertainty and Performance: A Path Analytic Model,”Management Science, 33, 4, 509–524.
12.
VenkatramanN. and RamanujamV. (October 1986) “Measurement of Business Performance in the Absence of Objective Measures,”Strategic Management Review, 11, 4, 801–814.
13.
VickeryS. (1991), “A Theory of Production Competence Revisited,”Decision Sciences, 22, 3, 635–643.
14.
VickeryS.DrogeC. C., and MarklandR. E. (1993), “Production Competence and Business Strategy: Do They Affect Business Performance?”Decision Sciences, 24, 2, 435–455.
15.
WoodC. H.RitzmanL. P., and SharmaD. (1990), “Intended and Achieved Competitive Priorities: Measures, Frequencies, and Financial Impact,” In Manufacturing Strategy, the Research Agenda for the Next Decade, Proceedings of the Joint Industry University Conference on Manufacturing Strategy, EttlieJ. E.BursteinM. C., and FiegenbaumA. (eds.), Ann Arbor, Michigan, 225–232.
