CampbellE. G.RaoS. R.DesRochesC. M.IezzoniL. I.VogeliC.Bolcic-JankovicD., “Physician Professionalism and Changes in Physician-Industry Relationships from 2004 to 2009,”Archives of Internal Medicine170, no. 20 (2010): 1820–1826.
2.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, P.L. 111–148, 23 March 2010. See also The Department of Health and Human Services, “Responsibility of Applicants for Promoting Objectivity in Research for which Public Health Service Funding Is Sought and Responsible Prospective Contractors,” <http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/coi/>(last visited July 30, 2012).
3.
BekelmanJ. E.LiY.GrossC. P., “Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review,”JAMA289, no. 4 (2003): 454–465.
4.
LexchinJ.BeroL. A.DjulbegovicB.ClarkO., “Pharmaceutical Industry Sponsorship and Research Outcome and Quality: Systematic Review,”BMJ326, no. 7400 (2003): 1167–1170.
5.
YankV.RennieD.BeroL. A., “Financial Ties and Concordance between Results and Conclusions in Meta-Analyses: Retrospective Cohort Study,”BMJ335, no. 7631 (2007): 1202–1205.
6.
UbelP. A.JepsonC.AschD. A., “Misperceptions about Beta-Blockers and Diuretics: A National Survey of Primary Care Physicians,”Journal of General Internal Medicine18, no. 12 (2003): 977–983.
7.
AdairR. F.HolmgrenL. R., “Do Drug Samples Influence Resident Prescribing Behavior? A Randomized Trial,”American Journal of Medicine118, no. 8 (2005): 881–884.
8.
KaiserJ., “Private Money, Public Disclosure,”Science325, no. 5936 (2009): 28–30.
9.
WhittingtonC. J.KendallT.FonagyP.CottrellD.CotgroveA.BoddingtonE., “Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Childhood Depression: Systematic Review of Published Versus Unpublished Data,”The Lancet363, no. 9418 (2004):1341–1345.
10.
TurnerE. H.MatthewsA. M.LinardatosE.TellR. A.RosenthalR., “Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy,”New England Journal of Medicine358, no. 3 (2008): 252–260.
GibsonL., “GlaxoSmithKline to Publish Clinical Trials After US Lawsuit,”BMJ328, no. 7455 (2004): 1513.
13.
KasteleinJ. J.AkdimF.StroesE. S.ZwindermanA. H.BotsM. L.StalenhoefA. F., “Simvastatin With or Without Ezetimibe in Familial Hypercholesterolemia,”New England Journal of Medicine358, no. 14 (2008): 1431–1443.
14.
AvornJ., “Dangerous Deception – Hiding the Evidence of Adverse Drug Effects,”New England Journal of Medicine355, no. 21 (2006): 2169–2171.
MooreE. E.MooreF. A.FabianT. C.BernardA. C.FuldaG. J.HoyD. B., “Human Polymerized Hemoglobin for the Treatment of Hemorrhagic Shock When Blood Is Unavailable: The USA Multicenter Trial,”Journal of the American College of Surgeons208, no. 1 (2009): 1–13.
17.
PsatyB. M.FurbergC. D.RayW. A.WeissN. S., “Potential for Conflict of Interest in the Evaluation of Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions: Use of Cerivastatin and Risk of Rhabdomyolysis,”JAMA292, no. 21 (2004): 2622–2631.
18.
LeeK.BacchettiP.SimI., “Publication of Clinical Trials Supporting Successful New Drug Applications: A Literature Analysis,”PLoS Medicine5, no. 9 (2008): e191.
CurfmanG. D.MorrisseyS.DrazenJ. M., “Expression of Concern Reaffirmed,”New England Journal of Medicine354, no. 11 (2006): 1193.
23.
WoodcockJ.SharfsteinJ. M.HamburgM., “Regulatory Action on Rosiglitazone by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,”New England Journal of Medicine363, no. 16 (2010): 1489–1491.
24.
LagakosS. W., “Time-to-Event Analyses for Long-Term Treatments – the APPROVe Trial,”New Engand Journal of Medicine355, no. 2 (2006): 113–117;
25.
see supra note 7.
26.
DeAngelisC. D.FontanarosaP. B., “Ensuring Integrity in Industry-Sponsored Research: Primum Non Nocere, Revisited,”JAMA303, no. 12 (2010): 1196–1198.
27.
HrachovecJ. B.MoraM., “Reporting of 6-month vs 12-Month Data in a Clinical Trial of Celecoxib,”JAMA286, no. 18 (2001): 2398, 2399–2400.
28.
WrightJ. M.PerryT. L.BassettK. L.ChambersG. K., “Reporting of 6-month vs 12-Month Data in a Clinical Trial of Celecoxib,”JAMA286, no. 19 (2001): 2398–2400.
29.
VedulaS. S.BeroL.SchererR. W.DickersinK., “Outcome Reporting in Industry-Sponsored Trials of Gabapentin for Off-Label Use,”New England Journal of Medicine361, no. 20 (2009): 1963–1971.
30.
LandefeldC. S.SteinmanM. A., “The Neurontin Legacy – Marketing through Misinformation and Manipulation,”New England Journal of Medicine360, no. 2 (2009): 103–106.
31.
RossJ. S.HillK. P.EgilmanD. S.KrumholzH. M., “Guest Authorship and Ghostwriting in Publications Related to Rofecoxib: A Case Study of Industry Documents from Rofecoxib Litigation,”JAMA299, no. 15 (2008): 1800–1812;
32.
see supra note 7.
33.
HillK. P.RossJ. S.EgilmanD. S.KrumholzH. M., “The ADVANTAGE Seeding Trial: A Review of Internal Documents,”Annals of Internal Medicine149, no. 4 (2008): 251–258.
34.
SteinmanM. A.BeroL. A.ChrenM. M.LandefeldC. S., “Narrative Review: The Promotion of Gabapentin: An Analysis of Internal Industry Documents,”Annals of Internal Medicine145, no. 4 (2006): 284–293;
35.
see supra note 9.
36.
CarrageeE. J.HurwitzE. L.WeinerB. K., “A Critical Review of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Trials in Spinal Surgery: Emerging Safety Concerns and Lessons Learned,”Spine Journal11, no. 6 (2011): 471–491.
37.
CarrageeE. J.GhanayemA. J.WeinerB. K.RothmanD. J.BonoC. M., “A Challenge to Integrity in Spine Publications: Years of Living Dangerously with the Promotion of Bone Growth Factors,”Spine Journal11, no. 6 (2011): 463–468.
38.
IngelfingerJ. R., “Through the Looking Glass: Anemia Guidelines, Vested Interests, and Distortions,”Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology2, no. 3 (2007): 415–417.
39.
Id.
40.
See supra notes 7, 9, 10, and 11.
41.
See supra note 6, 7, and 9.
42.
See supra note 6.
43.
See supra note 14.
44.
GrahamD. J.CampenD.HuiR.SpenceM.CheethamC.LevyG., “Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients Treated with Cyclo-Oxygenase 2 Selective and Non-Selective Non-Steroidal Anti-Infammatory Drugs: Nested Case-Control Study,”The Lancet365, no. 9458 (2005): 475–481.
OkikeK.KocherM. S.WeiE. X.MehlmanC. T.BhandariM., “Accuracy of Conflict-of-Interest Disclosures Reported by Physicians,”New England Journal of Medicine361, no. 15 (2009): 1466–1474.
47.
SteinbrookR., “Online Disclosure of Physician-Industry Relationships,”New England Journal of Medicine360, no. 4 (2009): 325–327.
48.
SteinbrookR.“Disclosure of Industry Payments to Physicians,”New England Journal of Medicine359, no. 6 (2008): 559–561.
49.
RossJ. S.LacknerL. E.LurieP.GrossC. P.WolfeS.KrumholzH. M., “Pharmaceutical Company Payments to Physicians: Early Experiences with Disclosure Laws in Vermont and Minnesota,”JAMA297, no. 11 (2007):1216–1223.
50.
BrennanT. A.MelloM. M., “Sunshine Laws and the Pharmaceutical Industry,”JAMA297, no. 11 (2007): 1255–1257.
SaverR., “Is It Really All about the Money? Reconsidering Non-Financial Interests in Medical Research,”Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics40, no. 3 (2012): 517–531.
60.
See supra note 28.
61.
EmanuelE. J.ThompsonD. F., “The Concept of Conflicts of Interest,”EmanuelE. J.GradyC.CrouchR. A.LieR. K.MillerF. G.WendlerD., eds., The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008): 758–766. See supra note 28.
62.
StosselT. P., “Regulation of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Medical Practice and Medical Research: A Damaging Solution in Search of a Problem,”Perspective Biological Medicine50, no. 1 (2007): 54–71.
63.
LewinJ.ArendT. E.Jr., “Industry and the Profession of Medicine: Balancing Appropriate Relationships with the Need for Innovation,”Journal of Vascular Surgergy54, no. 3, Supp. (2011): 47S–49S.
64.
See supra note 28.
65.
ZinnerD. E.BjankovicD.ClarridgeB.BlumenthalD.CampbellE. G., “Participation of Academic Scientists in Relationships with Industry,”Health Affairs (Millwood) 28, no. 6 (2009): 1814–1825.
66.
See supra note 28.
67.
MosesH.MartinJ. B., “Academic Relationships with Industry: A New Model for Biomedical Research,”JAMA285, no. 7 (2001): 933–935.
68.
See supra note 28.
69.
Committee on a Framework for Development a New Taxonomy of Disease
70.
National Research Council, “Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease,” available at <http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13284>(visited July 30, 2012).
71.
Id.
72.
LeeG.StuderL., “Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Technology for the Study of Human Disease,”Nature Methods7, no. 1 (2010): 25–27.
73.
See supra note 28.
74.
WeinfurtK. P.SeilsD. M.TzengJ. P.LinL.SchulmanK. A.CaliffR. M., “Consistency of Financial Interest Disclosures in the Biomedical Literature: The Case of Coronary Stents,”PLoS ONE3, no. 5 (2008): e2128.
75.
ForbesT. L., “Author Disclosure of Conflict of Interest in Vascular Surgery Journals,”Journal of Vascular Surgergy54, no. 3, Supp. (2011): 55S–58S.
76.
See supra note 28.
77.
Id.
78.
DanaJ., “How Psychological Research Can Inform Policies for Dealing with Conflicts of Interest in Medicine,” in LoB.FieldM., eds., Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2009): At 358–374.
79.
DanaJ.LoewensteinG., “A Social Science Perspective on Gifts to Physicians from Industry,”JAMA290, no. 2 (2003): 252–255.
80.
See supra note 13.
81.
ThalerR. H.SunnsteinC. R., Nudge (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008).
82.
HughesV., “Sunshine on Conflicts,”Nature Biotechnology28, no. 7 (2010): At 641–643.
83.
See supra note 46.
84.
See supra note 2.
85.
See supra note 28.
86.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, “Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals,” available at <http://www.icmje.org/index.html>(last visited July 30, 2012).
87.
GrahamR.MancherM.WolmanD. M.GreenfieldS.SteinbergE., “Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust,” available at <http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13058>(last visited July 30, 2012);
88.
See supra note 28.
89.
SinghN.BushR.DalsingM.ShortellC. K., “New Paradigms for Physician-Industry Relations: Overview and Application for SVS Members,”Journal of Vascular Surgergy54, no. 3, Supp. (2011): 26S–30S.
90.
RothmanD. J.ChimonasS., “Academic Medical Centers' Conflict of Interest Policies,”JAMA304, no. 20 (2010): 2294–2295.
91.
StosselT. P., “Regulating Academic-Industrial Research Relationships – Solving Problems or Stifling Progress?”New England Journal of Medicine353, no. 10 (2005): 1060–1065.
92.
StosselT. P.StellL. K., “Time to ‘Walk the Walk’ about Industry Ties to Enhance Health,”Nature Medicine17, no. 4 (2011): 437–438.
93.
RothmanK. J., “Conflicts of Interest: The New McCarthyism in Science,”JAMA269, no. 21 (1993): 2782–2784.
94.
See supra note 28.
95.
Id.
96.
LoB., “Serving Two Masters – Conflicts of Interest in Academic Medicine,”New England Journal of Medicine362, no. 8 (2010): 669–671.
97.
LoB., “Conflict of Interest Policies: An Opportunity for the Medical Profession to Take the Lead,”Academic Medicine85, no. 1 (2010): 9–11.
98.
FreischlagJ. A., “Academic Medical Centers Write Their Own Rules,”Journal of Vascular Surgery54, no. 3, Supp. (2011): 19S–21S.
99.
KahnN. B.Jr.LichterA. S., “The New CMSS Code for Interactions with Companies Managing Relationships to Minimize Conflicts,”Journal of Vascular Surgergery54, no. 3, Supp. (2011): 34S–40S.