Restricted accessMeeting reportFirst published online 2011-8
When Public Health and Genetic Privacy Collide: Positive and Normative Theories Explaining How ACA's Expansion of Corporate Wellness Programs Conflicts with GINA's Privacy Rules
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA or ACA), Pub. L. No. 111–148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010) as amended by Health Care and Education Reform Act of 2010, Pub. L. No. 111–152, 124 Stat. 1209 (2010) (codified as amended in scattered sections of 42 U.S.C.).
ACA § 4303; There is no universally recognized definition of “Wellness.” One typical description of a Wellness Program is a “comprehensive health program designed to maintain a high level of well-being through proper diet, light exercises, stress management, and illness prevention.” See <http://www.busi*-nessdictionary.com/definition/wellness-program.html> (last visited July 26, 2011).
4.
Title II of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA), 29 C.R.F. § 1635.8 (2010). Employee Wellness Programs are organized efforts by employers who provide health insurance to their employees to reduce illness and absenteeism by encouraging employees to adopt healthier lifestyles. These programs typically target behaviors like quitting smoking, losing weight, and lowering blood pressure and cholesterol.
5.
This article adopts the definition provided by ACA for a “comprehensive workplace wellness program” which is one that includes the following: “1. health awareness initiatives, including health education, preventive screenings, and health risk assessments; 2. efforts to maximize employee engagement, including mechanisms to encourage employee participation; 3. initiatives to change unhealthy behaviors and lifestyle choices, including counseling, seminars, online programs, and self-help materials; and 4. supportive environments efforts, including workplace policies to encourage healthy lifestyles, healthy eating, increased physical activity, and improved mental health.” (section 10408(c)). This article leaves for another time the argument that a population which protects its members from discrimination is, in fact, acting in its own best interests in that it is upholding the ethical principles of fairness which it has adopted for itself.
6.
DoyleA. C., “Silver Blaze,” in The Adventures and the Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes, GlinertE., ed. (New York: Penguin Group, 2001).
7.
For an overview of the individual liberties perspective of public health law, see GostinL. O., Public Health Law: Power, Duty, Restraint, 2nd ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008): At 87.
8.
LeonardE. W., “State Constitutionalism and the Right to Health Care,”University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law12, no. 5 (2010): 1325–1406, at 1382.
9.
Id.
10.
KohH. K.SebeliusK. G., “Promoting Prevention through the Affordable Care Act,”New England Journal of Medicine363, no. 14 (2010): 1296–1299, available at <http://healthpolicyandreform.nejm.org/> (last visited July 1, 2011).
11.
Id.
12.
Id.
13.
(quoting KohH. K., “A 2020 Vision for Healthy People,”New England Journal of Medicine362, no. 18 [2010]: 1653–1656).
14.
Id. The provisions of the law which direct “the secretary of health and human services to assess existing federal health and wellness initiatives and directs the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to survey worksite health policies and programs nationally” are beyond the scope of this article.
15.
ACA § 4303.
16.
See Koh and Sebelius, supra note 10.
17.
Id.
18.
LeezerJ.LongA.BassC., “Understanding the Impact of Health Care Reform on Wellness Promotion,”The Slant26, (October 2010): 1–6, at 1, available at <https://www.onlife-health.com/em_newsEvents.aspx> (last visited July 7, 2011).
According to UNICEF, “Almost fifty per cent of the developing world's population – 2.5 billion people – lack improved sanitation facilities, and over 884 million people still use unsafe drinking water sources.”.
Institute of Medicine, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), “Screening for Obesity in Adults,” available at <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK15358/> (last visited July 1, 2011).
KottkeT. E.PronkN. P.IshamG. J., “Does Prevention Save Money?”Health Affairs28, no. 5 (2009): 1554–1555, at 1555.
29.
Id.
30.
MarinerW. K., “Social Solidarity and Personal Responsibility in Health Reform,”Connecticut Insurance Law Journal14, no. 2 (2008): 199–228, at 225.
31.
ThomasJ. D., “Mandatory Wellness Programs: A Plan to Reduce Health Care Costs or a Subterfuge to Discriminate Against Overweight Employees?”Howard Law Journal53, no. 2 (2010): 513–555, at 517–518.
32.
Id., at 519.
33.
See also this description from an employee benefits consulting firm: “Worksite wellness programs give employers a way to encourage their employees to take personal responsibility for their health and, in some cases, even reward them for making behavioral and lifestyle changes. Healthier employees utilize fewer health care services, are absent less often, and are more productive.” Highmark, Close Up: PPACA Makes Changes to Support Workersite Wellness, available at <https://www.highmarkonhealthreform.com/media/pdf/65_Close-Up11–01.pdf> (last visited July 1, 2011).
Coronary Health Improvement Project, Lifestyle Intervention Programs for Employee Health, “6 CHIP Employee Wellness Programs: Pooled Analysis of 8-Week Results (n=442),” available at <http://www.lifestylehealthcenter.org/corporates.htm#0z> (last visited July 1, 2011).
37.
LinnanL.BowlingM.ChildressJ.LindsayG.BlakeyC.PronkS.WiekerS.RoyallP., “Results of the 2004 National Health Worksite Survey,”American Journal of Public Health98, no. 8 (2008): 1503–1509, at 1504, available at <http://www.rwjf.org/files/research/ajph.3407.2007.115626v1.pdf> (last visited July 1, 2011).
38.
Id.
39.
BerryL. L.MirabitoA. M.BaunW. B., “What's the Hard Return on Employee Wellness Programs?”Harvard Business Review88, no. 12 (December 2010): 104–112.
PendoE., “Working Sick: Lessons of Chronic Illness for Health Care Reform,”Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics9, no. 2 (2009): 453–5470, available at <http://ssrn.com/abstract1435545> (last visited July 14, 2011).
45.
See Rosenbaum, supra note 34, at 11 (citation omitted).
46.
Id.
47.
See MelloRosenthal, supra note 43
48.
RothsteinM. A.HarrellH. L., “Health Risk Reduction Programs in Employer-Sponsored Health Plans: Part II—Law and Ethics,”Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine51, no. 8 (2010): 951–957
U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Women in the Labor Force: A Databook,” September 2008, available at <http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook2008.htm> (last visited July 1, 2011).
53.
RobertsB.PovichD.MatherM., “Great Recession Hit Hard at America's Working Poor: Nearly 1 in 3 Working Families in United States Are Low-Income,” The Working Poor Families Project Policy Brief (Winter 2010–2011), available at <http://www.workingpoorfamilies.org/pdfs/policybrief-win*-ter2011.pdf> (last visited July 1, 2011).
54.
ThomasJ. D., “Mandatory Wellness Programs: A Plan to Reduce Health Care Costs or a Subterfuge to Discriminate against Overweight Employees?”Howard Law Journal53, no. 2 (2010): 513–555, at 513.
Leade Health, “The Business Case for Weight/Obesity Management Using Health Coaching Interventions,” available at <http://www.leadehealth.com/index_wp2.html> (last visited July 14, 2011).
MustA., “Improving Coordination of Legal-Based Efforts across Jurisdictions and Sectors for Obesity Prevention and Control,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics37, no. 2 (2009): 90–98, at 92.
65.
Cong. Research Serv., H.R. 3590, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2010) available at <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:HR03590:@@@D&summ2=m&> (last visited July 1, 2011) (Bill “Provides that nothing in this Act shall be construed to require that an individual terminate coverage under a group health plan or health insurance coverage in which such individual was enrolled on the date of enactment of this Act.”)
MonahanA.SchwarczD., “Will Employers Undermine Health Care Reform by Dumping Sick Employees?”Virginia Law Review97, no. 1 (2011): 125–198 (presenting their empirical research on the possible effect of wellness programs to dump patients into public exchanges).
69.
Id., at 130–131.
70.
Id., at 170.
71.
Id.
72.
Id., at 169–170.
73.
ACA § 4303.
74.
See Mello and Rosenthal, supra note 43, at 197–198.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act(HIPAA), 42 U.S.C § 300 gg-41 (1996). For an overview of ACA's amendments to HIPAA,
78.
See RowenH., “How the Federal Healthcare Reform Law Will Affect Healthcare Premiums, Healthcare Benefits and the Market for Coverage,”Health Lawyer23, no. 4 (2011): 55–60, at 56.
79.
See Mello and Rosenthal, supra note 43, at 197.
80.
See Berrysupra note 40.
81.
Id.
82.
OrmondB. A.SpillmanB. C.WaidmannT. A.CaswellK. J.TereschenkoB., “Potential National and State Medical Care Savings from Primary Disease Prevention,”American Journal of Public Health10, no. 1 (2011): 157–164, available at <http://healthyamericans.org/assets/files/Urban%20AJPH%202010.pdf> (last visited July 1, 2011).
83.
Id.
84.
American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, “Healthy Workforce/Healthy Economy: The Role of Health, Productivity, and Disability Management in Addressing the Nation's Health Care Crisis: Why an Emphasis on the Health of the Workforce Is Vital to the Health of the Economy,”Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine51, no. 1 (2009): 114–119, at 115, available at <http://www.acoem.org/uploadedFiles/Healthy_Workplaces_Now/Healthy%20Work*-force%20-%20Healthy%20Economy.pdf> (last visited July 1, 2011).
85.
ACA § 2801(c)(1).
86.
According to the Congressional Budget Office § 1001 of ACA creates or modifies five laws related to Wellness programs. They are: § 2717 in the Public Health Services Act (PHSA) concerning reporting requirements for group health plans
87.
PPACA § 1201, which creates a new § 2705 in the PHSA prohibiting discrimination on the basis of health status
88.
PPACA § 4303, amended by § 10404 of P.L. 111–152, creates sections in the PHSA, including section 399MM, which provides for Centers for Disease Control (CDC) grants for employer-based wellness programs
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001–1461, 1181 (1974);
92.
MarinerW. K., “Health Reform: What's Insurance Got to Do with It? Recognizing Health Insurance as a Separate Species of Insurance,”American Journal of Law & Medicine36, nos. 2 & 3 (2010): 436–451, at 442.
Paychex, “Company Information,” available at <http://www.paychex.com/company/aboutus.aspx> (last visited July 1, 2011) (“Paychex, Inc. is a recognized leader in the payroll and human resource industry, serving over a half million businesses nationwide”).
Department of Labor, “FAQs about Affordable Care Act Implementation Part V and Mental Health Parity Implementation,” December 22, 2010, Employee Benefits Security Administration, available at <http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/faq-aca5.pdf> (last visited July 7, 2011).
103.
Id.
104.
Id. The inter-relationship between ACA and the various provisions regulating Wellness Programs is complex. This is how the Department of Labor explains the recent changes: “The Affordable Care Act added a new section 2705 to the PHS Act regarding nondiscrimination and wellness. Section 715(a)(1) of ERISA and section 9815(a)(1) of the Code incorporate section 2705 of the PHS Act by reference. PHS Act section 2705 largely incorporates the provisions of the Departments' joint final regulations with a few clarifications and changes the maximum reward that can be provided under a health-contingent wellness program from 20 percent to 30 percent. This change is effective in 2014.”.
105.
HIPAA § 300 gg-41. For an overview of ACA's amendments to HIPAA, see RowenH., “How the Federal Healthcare Reform Law Will Affect Healthcare Premiums, Healthcare Benefits and the Market for Coverage,”Health Lawyer23, no. 4 (2011): 55–60, at 56.
HIPAA §300 gg-41; Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 112(d), amended by 47 U.S.C. § 255 (2008); ERISA §§ 1181–1183.
114.
See infra at 479–481.
115.
The Department of Labor has provided guidance to its field officers to determine whether an employer's wellness program is regulated under ERISA. The determining factors seem to be whether or not the program is part of a health insurance program offered by a covered entity. See Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2008–02 (February 14, 2008), available at <http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/regs/fab2008–2.html> (last visited July 1, 2011).
116.
These regulations were jointly issued by the Departments of Labor, the Treasury, and Health and Human Services. See 29 CFR 2590.702.
Requirements for the Group Health Insurance Market, 45 C.F.R. § 146.121(b)(2)(i)(B) (2010) (“[A] restriction on a benefit or benefits must apply uniformly to all similarly situation individuals and must not be directed at individual participants or beneficiaries based on any health factor of the participants or beneficiaries…”).
RubensteinD., “The Emergence of Mandatory Wellness Programs in the United States: Welcoming, or Worrisome?”Journal of Health Care Law and Policy12, no. 1 (2009): 99–118, at 108.
132.
Employers have become interested in lowering costs both for health care and from absenteeism by directly trying to influence the health of their employees. PaiC.-W.MullinJ.PayneG. M.LoveJ.O'ConnellG.EdingtonD. W., “Factors Associated with Incidental Sickness Absence among Employees in One Health Care System,”American Journal of Health Promotion24, no. 1 (2009): 37–48
133.
GoetzelR.OzminkowskiR.BrunoJ.RutterK.FikryI.WangS., “The Long-Term Impact of Johnson & Johnson's Health & Wellness Program on Employee Health Risks,”Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 44, no. 5 (2002): 417–424 (reporting “significant risk reduction in 8 of 13 risk categories examined for all employees who [enrolled in a risk reduction program who] participated in two health risk assessments over an average of 2 3/4 years”).
EEOC Enforcement Guidance on Disability-Related Inquiries and Medical Examinations of Employees Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), available at <http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/guidance-inquiries.html#N_12_> (last visited July 1, 2011). Accompanying the memo is a state of acknowledgement that the ADA was amended in 2008 and that the Office of Legal Counsel would be reviewing all previously issued Guidance material. However, it is unlikely that these changes will change the prohibitions on when employers can ask about disabilities or who they can ask. As the EEOC explains, the changes primarily concern “the definition of the term ‘disability’ by rejecting the holdings in several Supreme Court decisions and portions of EEOC's ADA regulations. The effect of these changes is to make it easier for an individual seeking protection under the ADA to establish that he or she has a disability within the meaning of the ADA,” available at <http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/adaaa_notice.cfm> (last visited July 1, 2011).
137.
Id.
138.
Id.
139.
Id. (citing See H.R. Rep. No. 101–485, pt. 2, at 75 (1990) (“As long as the programs are voluntary and the medical records are maintained in a confidential manner and not used for the purpose of limiting health insurance eligibility or preventing occupational advancement, these activities would fall within the purview of accepted activities.”).
140.
Id.
141.
Seff v. Broward Cnty, No. 10–61437, 2011 WL 1522558, at *4–5 (S.D. Fla. April 11, 2011).
142.
Id.
143.
Id.
144.
Id., at *1.
145.
Id.
146.
Id.
147.
Id.
148.
Id., at *3.
149.
Id.
150.
Id.
151.
RothsteinM. A., “Genetic Stalking and Voyeurism: A New Challenge to Privacy,”University of Kansas Law Review57, no. 3 (2010): 539–577, at 562.
152.
29 C.R.F. § 1635.8.
153.
Id.
154.
Id.
155.
HoffmanS., “The Importance of Immutability in Employment Discrimination Law,”William & Mary Law Review52, no. 4 (2011): 1483–1546, at 1492 (pointing out that the courts have not heard any GINA discrimination cases).
Department of Health and Human Services, “Surgeon General's Family Health History Initiative,” available at <http://www.hhs.gov/familyhistory/> (last visited July 10, 2011)
See ParisiT. J., “The Onus Is on You: Wellness Plans and Other Strategies Being Employed for Patients to Take Ownership of Their Health,”Quinnipiac Health Law Journal13, no. 2 (2010): 243–278.
177.
Id.
178.
Rodrigues v. Scotts Co., No. 07–10104-GAO, 2008 WL 251971, at *1–4 (D. Mass. Jan. 30, 2008)
See also Rubenstein, supra note 116, at 113. For a discussion of how employer oversight of out-of-work activities are evidence of an increased emphasis on personal responsibility
181.
see BlacksherE., “Health Reform and Health Equity: Sharing Responsibility for Health in the United States,”Hofstra Law Review39 (2011): 41–58, at 47–54. For a fuller discussion of state laws which can help or hinder wellness programs,
182.
See generally, HendrixA.BuckJ., “Employer-Sponsored Wellness Programs: Should Your Employer Be the Boss of More Than Your Work,”Southwestern Law Review38, no. 3 (2009): 465–501
183.
and LippsJ., State Lifestyle Statutes and the Blogosphere: Autonomy for Private Employees in the Internet Age,”Ohio State Law Journal72, no. 3 (2011): 645–685.
184.
PierottiJ., “The ‘Bottom Line’: A Smokescreen for the Reality That Anti-Tobacco Employment Practices Are Hazardous to Minority Health and Equality,”Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy26, no. 2 (2010): 441–470, at 441.
185.
Id., at 464–468 (American Indian is the term the author used and I have checked around and find that it is coming back into use and is currently preferable to “Native American”);
186.
see also FerkassianE., “Expanding Waistlines: How Some States and Employers Are Responding to the Obesity Epidemic and Its Impact on Rising Health Care Costs,”Annals of Health Law Advance Directive20, no. 1 (2010) 116–124.
187.
29 C.F.R. § § 1635.8.
188.
United States Equal Opportunity Employment Commission, “Questions and Answers for Small Businesses: EEOL Final Rule on Title II of the Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act of 2008,” available at <http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/regulations/gina_qanda_smallbus.cfm> (last visited July 1, 2011).
BrowerV., “Epigenetics: Unraveling the Cancer Code,” Nature 471 (March 23, 2011): S12–S13, available at <http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v471/n7339_supp/full/471S12a.html> (“If the genetic code is the hardware for life, the epigenetic code is software that determines how the hardware behaves – and as such it can be rewritten.”).