BonardiD. J., Teachers' Decisions to Report Child Abuse: The Effects of Ethnicity, Attitudes, and Experiences [Doctoral], Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, 2000; Flaherty EmaleeE. G.JonesR.SegeR., “Telling Their Stories: Primary Care Practitioners' Experience Evaluating and Reporting Injuries Caused By Child Abuse,”Child Abuse & Neglect28, no. 9 (2004): 939–945; FlahertyE. G.SegeR.MattsonC. L.BinnsH. J., “Assessment of Suspicion of Abuse in the Primary Care Setting,”Ambulatory Pediatrics2, no. 2 (2002): 120–126; HoweA. C.HerzbergerS.TennenH., “The Influence of Personal History of Abuse and Gender on Clinicians' Judgments of Child Abuse,”Journal of Family Violence3, no. 2 (1988): 105–119; MeltonG. B., “Chronic Neglect of Family Violence: More Than a Decade of Reports to Guide US Policy,”Child Abuse & Neglect26, nos. 6–7 (2002): 569–586; TiroshE.OfferS. S.CohenA.JaffeM., “Attitudes towards Corporal Punishment and Reporting of Abuse,”Child Abuse & Neglect27, no. 8 (2003): 929–937; GunnV. L.HicksonG. B.CooperW. O., “Factors Affecting Pediatricians' Reporting of Suspected Child Maltreatment,”Ambulatory Pediatrics5, no. 2 (2005): 96–101.
2.
LaneW. G.RubinD. M.MonteithR.ChristianC. W., “Racial Differences in the Evaluation of Pediatric Fractures for Physical Abuse,”JAMA288, no. 13 (2002): 1603–1609; WarnerJ. E.HansenD. J., “The Identification and Reporting of Physical Abuse by Physicians: A Review and Implications for Research,”Child Abuse & Neglect18, no. 1 (1994): 11–25.
ApplebaumP. S., “Law & Psychiatry: Child Abuse Reporting Laws: Time for Reform?”Law & Psychiatry50, no. 1 (1999): 27–29; MeltonG. B., “Mandated Reporting: A Policy without Reason,”Child Abuse & Neglect29, no. 1 (2005): 9–18; BeckK. A.ColoffJ. R., “Child Abuse Reporting in British Columbia,”Research and Practice26, no. 3 (1995): 245–251.
5.
Levi BenjaminB. H.LoebenG., “Index of Suspicion: Feeling Not Believing,”Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics25, no. 4 (2004): 1–34.
6.
GaudiosiJ. A., Child Maltreatment 2007, US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children and Families and Youth, Children's Bureau, 2009.
7.
CrumeT. L.DiGuiseppiC.ByersT.SirotnakA. P.GarrettC. J., “Underascertainment of Child Maltreatment Fatalities by Death Certificates, 1990–1998,”Pediatrics110, no. 2, Pt. 1 (2002): e18.
8.
MacMillanH. L.FlemingJ. E.TrocmeN.BoyleM. H.WongM.RacineY. A., “Prevalence of Child Physical and Sexual Abuse in the Community: Results from the Ontario Health Supplement,”JAMA278, no. 2 (1997): 131–135.
9.
See Gaudiosi, supra note 6; WyattG. E.LoebT. B.SolisB.CarmonaJ. V., “The Prevalence and Circumstances of Child Sexual Abuse: Changes across a Decade,”Child Abuse & Neglect23, no. 1 (1999): 45–60.
10.
See WarnerHansen, supra note 2; Gaudiosi, supra note 6; DrakeB.ZuravinA., “Bias in Child Maltreatment Reporting: Revisiting the Myth of Classlessness,”American Journal of Orthopsychiatry68, no. 2 (1998): 295–304; FinkelhorD.JonesL., “Why Have Child Maltreatment and Child Victimization Declined?”Journal of Social Issues62, no. 4 (2006): 685–716; MerskyJ. P.BergerL. M.ReynoldsA. J.GromoskeA. N., “Risk Factors for Child and Adolescent Maltreatment A Longitudinal Investigation of a Cohort of Inner-City Youth,”Child Maltreatment14, no. 1 (2009): 73–88.
11.
DiazA.SimantovE.RickertV. I., “Effect of Abuse on Health,”Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine156, no. 8 (2002): 811–817; LansfordJ. E.DodgeK. A.PettitG. S.BatesJ. E.CrozierJ.KaplowJ., “A 12-Year Prospective Study of the Long-Term Effects of Early Child Physical Maltreatment on Psychological, Behavioral, and Academic Problems in Adolescence,”Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine156, no. 8 (2002): 824–830; MacMillanH. L.FlemingJ. E.StreinerD. L.ElizabethLinBoyleM. H.JamiesonE., “Childhood Abuse and Lifetime Psychopathology in a Community Sample,”American Journal of Psychiatry158, no. 11 (2001): 1878–1883; ScheidJ. M., “Recognizing and Managing Long-Term Sequelae of Childhood Maltreatment,”Pediatric Annals32, no. 6 (2003): 391–401; WidomC. A., “Post-traumatic Stress Disorder in Abused and Neglected Children Grown Up,”American Journal of Psychiatry156, no. 8 (1999): 1223–1229; GilbertR.WidomC. S.BrowneK.FergussonD.WebbE.JansonS., “Child Maltreatment 1 Burden and Consequences of Child Maltreatment in High-Income Countries,”The Lancet373, no. 9657 (2009): 68–81.
See Melton, supra note 4; FlahertyE. G.SegeR., “Barriers to Physician Identification and Reporting of Child Abuse,”Pediatric Annals34, no. 5 (2005): 349–356; RenkeW. N., “The Mandatory Reporting of Child Abuse under the Child Welfare Act,”Health Law Journal7, (1999): 91–140.
14.
See Gaudiosi, supra note 6.
15.
Gateway Child Welfare Information, Mandatory Reporters of Child Abuse and Neglect, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2008.
16.
Saul Ornelas and Ismael Ornelas-Ledesma v. United States, 517 US 690 (1996); MyersJ. E. B., “Medicolegal Aspects of Suspected Child Abuse,” in ReeceR. M.LudwigS., eds., Child Abuse: Medical Diagnosis and Treatment (Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins, 2001): At 545–563.
17.
See Applebaum, supra note 4; Levi, supra note 5; DeiszR.DoueckH.GeorgeN., “Reasonable Cause: A Qualitative Study of Mandated Reporting,”Child Abuse & Neglect20, no. 4 (1996): 275–287; KalichmanS. C., Mandated Reporting of Suspected Child Abuse: Ethics, Law, & Policy, 2nd ed. (Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1999).
18.
LeviB. H.BrownG., “Reasonable Suspicion: A Study of Pennsylvania Pediatricians Regarding Child Abuse,”Pediatrics116, no. 1 (2005): E5-e12.
19.
LeviB. H.CrowellK., “Child Abuse Experts Disagree about the Threshold for Mandated Reporting,”Clinical Pediatrics (published online December 6, 2010).
20.
LeviB. H.BrownG.ErbC., “Reasonable Suspicion: A Pilot Study of Pediatric Residents,”Child Abuse & Neglect30, no. 4 (2006): 345–356.
21.
LevyH. B.MarkovicJ.ChaudhryU.AhartS.TorresH., “Reabuse Rates in a Sample of Children Followed for 5 Years after Discharge from a Child Abuse Inpatient Assessment Program,”Child Abuse & Neglect19, no. 11 (1995): 1363–1377.
22.
Though many states also stipulate that known abuse requires reporting, in all such instances the state statute identifies an additional threshold considerably lower than knowledge. As such, it is the lower threshold that defines mandated reporting.
23.
See Levi, supra note 5.
24.
See Myers, supra note 16.
25.
Id.
26.
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Lowell Grover, 437 N.W.2d 60, 63 (MN S. Ct. 1989); Carl E. Gray v. State of Florida, 520 So2d 584 (FL S. Ct. 1988); People of the State of Michigan v. Alfred Cavaiani, 432 N.W.2d 409, 413 (MI App. Ct. 1988).
27.
State of Missouri v. Leslie A. Brown, 140 SW3d 51 (MO S. Ct. 2004).
28.
See Kalichmann, supra note 17
29.
See Levi, supra note 5.
30.
See Levi, supra notes 18 and 20.
31.
Connally v. General Construction Company, 269 U.S. 385, 391(S. Ct. 1926).
32.
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1; 88 (S. Ct. 1968). Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Benjamin R. Reppert. 383 A.2d (PA Super 2001).
33.
Of course, one might argue that reports of suspected abuse are different in that they merely initiate investigations, not prosecutions. As such, due process is not violated because (as for law enforcement) rigorous standards do exist for scrutinizing the actions of child protection services officials. What this argument ignores, however, is that child abuse investigations are not only invasive, they are often accusational, typically disruptive, and almost always very stressful. The constitutional protections contained in the fourth and fifth amendments to the U.S. Constitution recognize the significant hardships that can arise from unreasonable searches and indictments, even if no conviction ensues. In this regard, mandated reporters' apprehensions parallel those of police officers. The crucial difference is that police officers can be held accountable for their exercise of judgment, while mandated reporters enjoy almost unassailable immunity.
34.
See Renke, supra note 13; WexlerR., Wounded Innocents: The Real Victims of the War Against Child Abuse (New York: Prometheus Books, 1995).
35.
RichmanH. A., Neuhauser Lecture, “From a Radiologist's Judgment to Public Policy on Child Abuse and Neglect: What Have We Wrought?”Pediatric Radiology30, no. 4 (2000): 219–228; Dupuy v. Samuels, F3d 493 (IL 7th Cir. Ct. 2005); ColemanD., “Storming the Castle to Save the Children: The Ironic Costs of a Child Welfare Exception to the Fourth Amendment,”William and Mary Law Review47, no. 94 (2005): 413–540.
36.
See Levi, supra note 5; WhiteA. R., “Suspicion,” in CanfieldJ. V., ed., Wittgenstein's Intentions (Hamden: Garland, 1993): At 81–85.
37.
SchulY.MayoR.BurnsteinE., “Encoding under Trust and Distrust: The Spontaneous Activation of Incongruent Cognitions,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology86, no. 5 (2004): 668–679.
38.
AppelA. E.HoldenG. W., “The Co-Occurrence of Spouse and Physical Child Abuse: A Review and Appraisal,”Journal of Family Psychology12, no. 4 (1998): 578–599; EdlesonJ. L., “The Overlap between Child Maltreatment and Woman Battering,”Violence Against Women5, no. 2 (1999): 134–154.
39.
BrownJ.CohenP.JohnsonJ. G.SalzingerS., “A Longitudinal Analysis of Risk Factors for Child Maltreatment: Findings of a 17-Year Prospective Study of Officially Recorded and Self-Reported Child Abuse and Neglect,”Child Abuse & Neglect2, no. 11 (1998): 1065–1078; GiardinoA. P.GiardinoE. R., Recognition of Child Abuse for the Mandated Reporter, 3rd ed. (St. Louis: G. W. Medical Publishing, Inc., 2002).
40.
Id. (Giardino).
41.
SinaiS. H.LawlessM. R.RaineyD. Y.EverettV. D.RunyanD. K.FrothinghamT., “Clinician Agreement on Physical Findings in Child Sexual Abuse Cases,”Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine151, no. 5 (1997): 497–501.
42.
EricksonM. J.HillT. D.SiegelR. M., “Barriers to Domestic Violence Screening in the Pediatric Setting,”Pediatrics108, no. 1 (2001): 98–102; Van HaeringenA. R.DaddsM.ArmstrongK. L., “The Child Abuse Lottery: Will the Doctor Suspect and Report? Physician Attitudes Towards and Reporting of Suspected Child Abuse and Neglect,”Child Abuse & Neglect22, no. 3 (1998): 159–169.
43.
See Deisz, supra note 17
44.
BlackerD. M., Reporting of Child Sexual Abuse: The Effects of Varying Definitions of Reasonable Suspicion on Psychologists' Reporting Behavior [Doctoral], California School of Professional Psychology, Berkeley/Alameda, 1998.
45.
See Applebaum, supra note 4; Melton, supra note 4; Wexler, supra note 34; Richman, supra note 35; Coleman, supra note 35; SingleyS. J., “Failure to Report Suspect Child Abuse: Civil Liability of Mandated Reporters,”Journal of Juvenile Law19 (1998): 236–271.
46.
NelsonW.ReynaV. F.FagerlinA.LipkusI.PetersE., “Clinical Implications of Numeracy: Theory and Practice,”Annals of Behavioral Medicine35, no. 3 (2008): 261–274.
47.
TeigenK. H., “When Are Low-Probability Events Judged to Be “Probable”? Effects of Outcome-set Characteristics on Verbal Probability Estimates,”Acta Pschologica68, no. 2 (1988): 157–174.
48.
SavelliJ. S., “Communicating Forecast Uncertainty: Public Perception of Weather Forecast Uncertainty,”Meteorological Applications17, no. 2 (2010): 180–195; MorssR. E.LazoJ. K.DemuthJ. L., “Examining the Use of Weather Forecasts in Decision Scenarios: Results from a US Survey with Implications for Uncertainty Communication,”Meteorological Applications17, no. 2 (2010): 149–162.
49.
ChristakisN. A., Death Foretold: Prophecy and Prognosis in Medical Care (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).
50.
See Blacker, supra note 44; FliegerC. L., Reporting Child Physical Abuse: The Effects of Varying Legal Definitions of Reasonable Suspicion on Psychologists' Child Abuse Reporting [Doctoral], Berkeley/Alameda, The California School of Professional Psychology, 1998.
51.
KagehiroD. K., “Defining the Standard of Proof in Jury Instructions,”Psychological Science1, no. 3 (1990): 194–200; KagehiroD. K.StantonW. C., “Legal vs Quantified Definitions of Standards of Proof,”Law and Human Behavior9, no. 2 (1985): 159–178.
52.
OlsonM. J.BudescuD. V., “Patterns of Preference for Numerical and Verbal Probabilities,”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making10, no. 2 (1997): 117–131; RapoportA.WallstenT. S.ErevI.CohenB. L., “Revision of Opinion with Verbally and Numerically Expressed Uncertainties,”Acta Psychologica74, no. 1 (1990): 61–79.
53.
See Levi, supra notes 18, 19, and 20; Blacker, supra note 44; and Flieger, supra 50.