MontiM. M.VanhaudenhuyseA.ColemanM. R.BolyM.PickardJ. D.TshibandaL.OwenA. M.LaureysS., “Willful Modulation of Brain Activity in Disorders of Consciousness,”New England Journal of Medicine362, no. 7 (2010): 579–589.
3.
SkeneL.WilkinsonD.KahaneG.SavulescuJ., “Neuroimaging and the Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment from Patients in Vegetative State,”Medical Law Review17, no. 2 (2009): 245–261.
4.
Though for discussion of withdrawal of life saving therapy in light of these developments, see WilkinsonD. J.KahaneG.HorneM.SavulescuJ., “Functional Neuroimaging and Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment from Vegetative Patients,”Journal of Medical Ethics35, no. 8 (2009): 508–511.
5.
MeiselA.CerminaraK. L., The Right to Die: The Law of End-of-Life Decisionmaking (New York: Aspen Publishers, 2004): At 6–128.1.
6.
PlumF.PosnerJ. B., The Diagnosis of Stupor and Coma (Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Co., 1980).
7.
LaureysS.OwenA. M.SchiffN. D., “Brain Function in Coma, Vegetative State, and Related Disorders,”Lancet Neurology3, no. 9 (2004): 537–546.
8.
The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS, “Medical Aspects of the Persistent Vegetative State (1),”New England Journal of Medicine330, no. 21 (1994): 1499–1508.
9.
Id., at 6.
10.
GiacinoJ. T.AshwalS.ChildsN.CranfordR.JennettB.KatzD. I.KellyJ. P.RosenbergJ. H.WhyteJ.ZafonteR. D.ZaslerN. D., “The Minimally Conscious State: Definition and Diagnostic Criteria,”Neurology58, no. 3 (2002): 349–53.
11.
FinsJ. J.SchiffN. D.FoleyK. M., “Late Recovery from the Minimally Conscious State: Ethical and Policy Implications,”Neurology68, no. 4 (2007): 304–307.
12.
SchnakersC.VanhaudenhuyseA.GiacinoJ.VenturaM.BolyM.MajerusS.MoonenG.LaureysS., “Diagnostic Accuracy of the Vegetative and Minimally Conscious State: Clinical Consensus Versus Standardized Neurobehavioral Assessment,”BMC Neurology9 (2009): 35.
13.
LaureysS.PerrinF.BredartS., “Self-Consciousness in Non-Communicative Patients,”Consciousness and Cognition16, no. 3 (2007): 722–741.
14.
OwenA. M.ColemanM. R., “Functional Neuroimaging of the Vegetative State,”Nature Reviews Neuroscience9, no. 3 (2008): 235–243.
15.
KochC., The Quest for Consciousness: A Neurobiological Approach (Denver: Roberts and Co., 2004)
16.
DehaeneS.ChangeuxJ. P.NaccacheL.SackurJ.SergentC., “Conscious, Preconscious, and Subliminal Processing: A Testable Taxonomy,”Trends in Cognitive Science10, no. 5 (2006): 204–211.
17.
BlockN. J.FlanaganO. J.GüzeldereG., The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997).
18.
BlockN. J., “Concepts of Consciousness,” in ChalmersD. J., ed., Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002): at 206.
19.
GüzeldereG., “The Many Faces of Consciousness: A Field Guide,” in BlockN. J.FlanaganO. J.GüzeldereG., eds., The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997): 1–68.
20.
See Block, supra note 18, at 206.
21.
ZolaE., Thérèse Raquin (Paris: E. Fasquelle, 1867).
22.
LaureysS.LemaireC.MaquetP.PhillipsC.FranckG., “Cerebral Metabolism During Vegetative State and After Recovery to Consciousness,”Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry67, no. 1 (1999): 121–122.
23.
de JongB. M.WillemsenA. T.PaansA. M., “Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Changes Related to Affective Speech Presentation in Persistent Vegetative State,”Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery99, no. 3 (1997): 213–216.
24.
MenonD. K.OwenA. M.WilliamsE. J.MinhasP. S.AllenC. M.BonifaceS. J.PickardJ. D., “Cortical Processing in Persistent Vegetative State,”The Lancet352, no. 9123 (1998): 200.
25.
SchiffN. D.RibaryU.MorenoD. R.BeattieB.KronbergE.BlasbergR.GiacinoJ.McCaggC.FinsJ. J.LlinasR.PlumF., “Residual Cerebral Activity and Behavioural Fragments Can Remain in the Persistently Vegetative Brain,”Brain125, no. 6 (2002): 1210–1234.
HildebrandtH.HappeS.DeutschmannA.Basar-ErogluC.ElingP.BrunhoberJ., “Brain Perfusion and VEP Reactivity in Occipital and Parietal Areas are Associated to Recovery from Hypoxic Vegetative State,”Journal of the Neurological Sciences260, no. 1–2 (2007): 150–158.
28.
KassubekJ.JuenglingF. D.ElsT.SpreerJ.HerpersM.KrauseT.MoserE.LuckingC. H., “Activation of a Residual Cortical Network During Painful Stimulation in Long-Term Postanoxic Vegetative State: A 15O-H2O PET Study,”Journal of the Neurological Sciences212, no. 1–2 (2003): 85–91.
29.
LaureysS.FaymonvilleM. E.PeigneuxP.DamasP.LambermontB.Del FioreG.DegueldreC.AertsJ.LuxenA.FranckG.LamyM.MoonenG.MaquetP., “Cortical Processing of Noxious Somatosensory Stimuli in the Persistent Vegetative State,”Neuroimage17, no. 2 (2002): 732–741.
30.
DiH. B.YuS. M.WengX. C.LaureysS.YuD.LiJ. Q.QinP. M.ZhuY. H.ZhangS. Z.ChenY. Z., “Cerebral Response to Patient's Own Name in the Vegetative and Minimally Conscious States,”Neurology68, no. 12 (2007): 895–899.
31.
See OwenColeman, supra note 14.
32.
StaffenW.KronbichlerM.AichhornM.MairA.LadurnerG., “Selective Brain Activity in Response to One's Own Name in the Persistent Vegetative State,”Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry77, no. 12 (2006): 1383–1384.
33.
PerrinF.SchnakersC.SchabusM.DegueldreC.GoldmanS.BredartS.FaymonvilleM. E.LamyM.MoonenG.LuxenA.MaquetP.LaureysS., “Brain Response to One's Own Name in Vegetative State, Minimally Conscious State, and Locked-In Syndrome,”Archives of Neurology63, no. 4 (2006): 562–569.
34.
OwenA. M.ColemanM. R.MenonD. K.BerryE. L.JohnsrudeI. S.RoddJ. M.DavisM. H.PickardJ. D., “Using a Hierarchical Approach to Investigate Residual Auditory Cognition in Persistent Vegetative State,”Progress in Brain Research150, (2005): 457–471.
35.
ColemanM. R.RoddJ. M.DavisM. H.JohnsrudeI. S.MenonD. K.PickardJ. D.OwenA. M., “Do Vegetative Patients Retain Aspects of Language Comprehension? Evidence from fMRI,”Brain130, no. 10 (2007): 2494–2507.
36.
DavisM. H.ColemanM. R.AbsalomA. R.RoddJ. M.JohnsrudeI. S.MattaB. F.OwenA. M.MenonD. K., “Dissociating Speech Perception and Comprehension at Reduced Levels of Awareness,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America104, no. 41 (2007): 16032–16037.
37.
SchnakersC.PerrinF.SchabusM.MajerusS.LedouxD.DamasP.BolyM.VanhaudenhuyseA.BrunoM. A.MoonenG.LaureysS., “Voluntary Brain Processing in Disorders of Consciousness,”Neurology71, no. 20 (2008): 1614–1620.
38.
SchnakersC.PerrinF.SchabusM.HustinxR.MajerusS.MoonenG.BolyM.VanhaudenhuyseA.BrunoM. A.LaureysS., “Detecting Consciousness in a Total Locked-In Syndrome: An Active Event-Related Paradigm,”Neurocase (2009): 1–7.
39.
LaureysS.PellasF.Van EeckhoutP.GhorbelS.SchnakersC.PerrinF.BerreJ.FaymonvilleM. E.PantkeK. H.DamasF.LamyM.MoonenG.GoldmanS., “The Locked-In Syndrome: What Is It Like to Be Conscious but Paralyzed and Voiceless?”Progress in Brain Research150 (2005): 495–511.
40.
OwenA. M.ColemanM. R.BolyM.DavisM. H.LaureysS.PickardJ. D., “Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State,”Science313, no. 5792 (2006): 1402.
41.
OwenA.ColemanM. R.BolyM.DavisM. H.LaureysS.JollesD.PickardJ. D., “Response to Comments on “Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State,”Science315, no. 5816 (2007): 1221.
42.
BolyM.ColemanM. R.DavisM. H.HampshireA.BorD.MoonenG.MaquetP. A.PickardJ. D.LaureysS.OwenA. M., “When Thoughts Become Action: An fMRI Paradigm to Study Volitional Brain Activity in Non-Communicative Brain Injured Patients,”Neuroimage36, no. 3 (2007): 979–992.
43.
See Monti, supra note 2.
44.
EisenbergJ. B., “Schiavo on the Cutting Edge: Functional Brain Imaging and its Impact on Surrogate End-of-Life Decision-Making,”Neuroethics1 (2008): 75–83.
45.
See MeiselCerminara, supra note 5, at 6–125.
46.
Henceforth, we use the term “unconscious state” or “unconsciousness” to refer to the formal state-law definition of consciousness, though it bears noting that states vary in these overall labels; i.e., some incorrectly use the term “persistent VS” instead of “permanent VS” or “permanent unconsciousness.” In these cases, the accompanying state-law definition might bear little resemblance to the clinical definition of VS.
47.
See MeiselCerminara, supra note 5, at 6–128.1.
48.
A note on methods: Our aim was to identify explicit state-laws definitions of consciousness, which are found most frequently in advance directive or surrogate decisionmaking statues. To generate this list we took as our starting point the thorough review of Meisel, supra note 5, which we supplemented with our own review of primary sources. Many end-of-life statutes do not provide such a definition (e.g., Alaska Stat. § 13.52, which does not explicitly define a vegetative state or other conditions having to do with consciousness). While we attempted to be as exhaustive as possible in this review, it is difficult to determine with certainty the absence of a law about a particular topic.
49.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. 261 U.S.344 (1990).
50.
Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 18-A § 5–801(s) (West 2009).
51.
S.C. Code Ann. § 44-77-20(7) (1976).
52.
Idaho Code Ann. § 39–4502(10) (2009).
53.
See Skene, supra note 3.
54.
Ala. Code § 22–8A-3(10) (1975); 755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 40/10 (West 2009).
55.
Wis. Stat. Ann. § 154.01(5m).
56.
See MeiselCerminara, supra note 5, at 7–83.
57.
Fla. Stat § 765.101(12) (West 2006).
58.
Ala. Code § 22–8A-3(10) (1975).
59.
S.D. Codified Laws § 34–12D-1(7).
60.
Fla. Stat § § 765.101(12) (West 2006).
61.
Ga. Code Ann. § 31-32-2(13) (West 2009); Va. Code Ann. § 54.1–2982 (West 2009).
62.
Ga. Code Ann. § 31-32-2(13) (West 2009).
63.
755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 40/10 (West 2009).
64.
Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 19a-570(10) (West 2009); Ga. Code Ann. § 31-32-2.
65.
See Jong, supra note 23.
66.
See Menon, supra note 24; see Schiff, supra note 26.
67.
Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 1337.11(V) (West 2009).
68.
Ala. Code § 22–8A-3(10) (1975); 755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 40/10 (West 2009); Ark. Code. Ann. § 20-17-201(6) (West 2009).
69.
See Laureys, supra note 29.
70.
See Coleman, supra note 35.
71.
See Davis, supra note 36.
72.
Fla. Stat § 765.101(12) (West 2006); Ala. Code § 22–8A-3(10) (1975); Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 19a-570(10) (West 2009); Ga. Code Ann. § 31-32-2(13) (West 2009); 755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 40/10 (West 2009)
73.
Ala. Code § 22–8A-4 (1975)
74.
Ala. Code § 22–8A-3(10) (1975)
75.
See CareyB., “Trace of Thought Is Found in ‘Vegetative’ Patient,”The New York Times, February 4, 2010, at A1; GroopmanJ., “Silent Minds,”The New Yorker, October 15, 2007, at 38–43; and supra note 1.
76.
See Schnakers, supra note 35.
77.
WegnerD. M., White Bears and Other Unwanted Thoughts: Suppression, Obsession, and the Psychology of Mental Control (New York: Viking, 1989).
78.
LogothetisN. K., “What We Can Do and What We Cannot Do with fMRI,”Nature453, no. 7197 (2008): 869–878.
79.
For an extensive review of other technologies that might be used for this purpose, see the recent theme issue of Progress in Brain Research on “Coma Science: Clinical and Ethical Implications,” especially TshibandaL.VanhaudenhuyseA.GalanaudD.BolyM.LaureysS.PuybassetL., “Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Coma Survivors: Promises and Pitfalls,”Progress in Brain Research177 (2009): 215–229.
80.
PoldrackR. A., “Can Cognitive Processes be Inferred from Neuroimaging Data?”Trends in Cognitive Science10, no. 2 (2006): 59–63.
81.
See Tshibanda, supra note 79.
82.
PettitM.Jr., “FMRI and BF meet FRE: Brain Imaging and the Federal Rules of Evidence,”American Journal of Law & Medicine33, no. 2–3 (2007): 319–40.
83.
FeigensonN.ParkJ., “Emotions and Attributions of Legal Responsibility and Blame: A Research Review,”Law and Human Behavior30, no. 2 (2006): 143–161.
84.
Frye v. U.S., 293 F. 1013 (1923).
85.
Daubert v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
86.
KhoshbinL. S.KhoshbinS., “Imaging the Mind, Minding the Image: An Historical Introduction to Brain Imaging and the Law,”American Journal of Law & Medicine33, nos. 2–3 (2007): 171–192.
87.
McCabeD. P.CastelA. D., “Seeing is Believing: The Effect of Brain Images on Judgments of Scientific Reasoning,”Cognition107, no. 1 (2008): 343–52.
88.
BennettM. R.DennettD.HackerP.SearleJ., Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind, and Language (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007); ChurchlandP. M., “Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes,”Journal of Philosophy78, no. 2 (1981): 67–90.
89.
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 20–403(6) (West 2009); Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 18-A § 5–801(s) (West 2009).
90.
KahaneG.SavulescuJ., “Brain Damage and the Moral Significance of Consciousness,”The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy34, no. 1 (2009): 6–26.
91.
See MeiselCerminara, supra note 3, at 4–74.
92.
LevyN.SavulescuJ., “Moral Significance of Phenomenal Consciousness,”Progress in Brain Research177 (2009): 361–370.
93.
Id., at 367.
94.
Id., at 368. Note that this conception of access consciousness (originally defined as the state of having mental information available for reasoning, the control of action, and reporting, see Block, supra note 15) also invokes the issues of chronicity and prognosis, which, while beyond the scope of this paper, may have significant ethical and legal relevance. For example, the fixed futility of the vegetative state is one of the foundational justifications of right-to-die movement in the United States, as reviewed in FinsJ. J., “The Ethics of Measuring and Modulating Consciousness: The Imperative of Minding Time,”Progress in Brain Research177 (2009): 371–82.
95.
See Wilkinson, supra note 4.
96.
See Skene, supra note 3.
97.
See Laureys, supra note 39.
98.
LuléD.ZicklerC.HäckerS.BrunoM. A.DemertziA.PellasF.LaureysS.KüblerA., “Life Can Be Worth Living in Locked-In Syndrome,”Progress in Brain Research177 (2009): 339–351.
99.
DennettD.C., Consciousness Explained (Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1991).
100.
AL: Ala. Code § 22–8A-3(10) (1975); AR: Ark. Code. Ann. § 20-17-201(6) (West 2009); CT: Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 19a-570(10) (West 2009); DE: Del. Code Ann. Tit. 16, “2501 (r) (1) (West 2009); FL: Fla. Stat § 765.101(12) (West 2009); GA: Ga. Code Ann. § 31-32-2(13) (West 2009); ID: Idaho Code Ann. § 39–4502(10) (2009); IL: 755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 40/10 (West 2009); MD: Md. Code Ann., [Health-Gen.] § 5–601(q) (West 2009); ME: Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 18-A § 5–801(s) (West 2009); NE: Neb. Rev. Stat. § 20–403(6) (West 2009); NH: N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 137-J:2(XVII) (2009); NJ: N.J. Stat. Ann. § 26:2H-55 (West 2009); OH: Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 1337.11(V) (West 2009); OR: Or. Rev. Stat § 127.505(19) (West 2009); PA: 20 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 5422 (West 2009); SC: S.C. Code Ann. § 44-77-20(7) (1976); SD: S.D. Codified Laws § 4–12D-1(7) (2009); VA: Va. Code Ann. § 54.1–2982 (West 2009); WI: Wis. Stat. Ann. § 154.01(5m) (West 2009); WV: W. Va. Code § 16-30-3(s) (West 2009).