DresserR., When Science Offers Salvation: Patient Advocacy and Research Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).
3.
AmariglioN.HirshbergA., “Donor-Derived Brain Tumor Following Neural Stem Cell Transplantation in an Ataxia Telangiectasia Patient,”PLoS Medicine6, no. 2 (2009): e1000029.
4.
HyunI.LindvallO., “New Isscr Guidelines Underscore Major Principles for Responsible Translational Stem Cell Research,”Cell Stem Cell3, no. 6 (2008): 607–9; LoB.KriegsteinA.GradyD., “Clinical Trials in Stem Cell Transplantation: Guidelines for Scientific and Ethical Review,”Clinical Trials5, no. 5 (2008): 517–22; MathewsD. J.SugarmanJ., “Cell-Based Interventions for Neurologic Conditions: Ethical Challenges for Early Human Trials,”Neurology71, no. 4 (2008): 288–293.
5.
PoeweW., “Treatments for Parkinson Disease – Past Achievements and Current Clinical Needs,”Neurology72, no. 7Supp. (2009): S65–S73.
6.
BenabidA. L.ChabardesS.MitrofanisJ.PollakP., “Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease,”Lancet Neurology8, no. 1 (2009): 67–81; WeaverF. M.FollettK., “Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation vs. Best Medical Therapy for Patients with Advanced Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial,”JAMA301, no. 1 (2009): 63–73.
7.
FreedC. R.GreeneP. E., “Transplantation of Embryonic Dopamine Neurons for Severe Parkinson's Disease,”N. Engl. J. Med. 344, no. 10 (2001): 710–9; OlanowC. W.GoetzC. G., “A Double-Blind Controlled Trial of Bilateral Fetal Nigral Transplantation in Parkinson's Disease,”Annals of Neurology54, no. 3 (2003): 403–14.
8.
Id.
9.
BraakH.Del TrediciK., “Assessing Fetal Nerve Cell Grafts in Parkinson's Disease,”Nature Medicine14, no. 5 (2008): 483–485; KordowerJ. H.ChuY., “Lewy Body-Like Pathology in Long-Term Embryonic Nigral Transplants in Parkinson's Disease,”Nature Medicine14, no. 5 (2008): 504–506; LiJ. Y.EnglundE., “Lewy Bodies in Grafted Neurons in Subjects with Parkinson's Disease Suggest Host-to-Graft Disease Propagation,”Nature Medicine14, no. 5 (2008): 501–503; MendezI.VinuelaA., “Dopamine Neurons Implanted into People with Parkinson's Disease Survive without Pathology for 14 Years,”Nature Medicine14, no. 5 (2008): 507–509.
10.
BodeenC.ZagierA. S., “China Offers Unproven Medical Treatments,”San Francisco Chronicle, January 6 2008, A17; EnserinkM., “Selling the Stem Cell Dream,”Science313, no. 5784 (2006): 160–163; PadmaT. V., “Unchecked by Guidelines, Indian Stem Cell Scientists Rush Ahead,”Nature Medicine12, no. 1 (2006): 4.
11.
DobkinB. H.CurtA.GuestJ., “Cellular Transplants in China: Observational Study from the Largest Human Experiment in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury,”Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair20, no. 1 (2006): 5–13.
12.
Id.
13.
See Freed, supra at note 7.
14.
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, “Cioms International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, Revised Draft,”available at <http://www.cioms.ch/frame_guidelines_january_2002.htm> (last visited April 5, 2010); National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979); World Medical Association, “Declaration of Helsinki,”avaialable at <http://www.wma.net/e/ethicsunit/helsinki.htm> (last visited April 5, 2010).
LoB., Ethical Dilemmas in Clinical Research: A Practical Guide, (Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009).
17.
JoffeS.CookE. F., “Quality of Informed Consent in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Cross-Sectional Survey,”Lancet358, no. 9295 (2001): 1772–1777.
18.
AppelbaumP. S.LidzC. W., “The Therapeutic Misconception,” in EmanuelE. J., ed., The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008): 633–644; LidzC. W.AppelbaumP. S.GrissoT.RenaudM., “Therapeutic Misconception and the Appreciation of Risks in Clinical Trials,”Social Science Medicine58, no. 9 (2004): 1689–1697.
19.
HendersonG. E.DavisA. M., “Uncertain Benefit: Investigators' Views and Communications in Early Phase Gene Transfer Trials,”Molecular Therapy10, no. 2 (2004): 225–31.
MacklinR., “The Ethical Problems with Sham Surgery in Clinical Research,”New England Journal of Medicine341, no. 13 (1999): 992–6.
27.
See Horng, supra note 25.
28.
KimS. Y.FrankS., “Science and Ethics of Sham Surgery: A Survey of Parkinson Disease Clinical Researchers,”Archives of Neurology62, no. 9 (2005): 1357–1360.
29.
FrankS. A.WilsonR., “Ethics of Sham Surgery: Perspective of Patients,”Movement Disorders23, no. 1 (2008): 63–68.
30.
See Weaver, 2009 and Benabid, 2009, supra note 6.
31.
FlemingT. R.PrenticeR. L.PepeM. S.GliddenD., “Surrogate and Auxiliary Endpoints in Clinical Trials, with Potential Applications in Cancer and Aids Research.”Statistics in Medicine13, (1994): 955–68.
32.
See Freed, supra note 7.
33.
ArkinL. M.SondhiD., “Confronting the Issues of Therapeutic Misconception, Enrollment Decisions, and Personal Motives in Genetic Medicine-Based Clinical Research Studies for Fatal Disorders,”Human Gene Therapy16, no. 9 (2005): 1028–1036.
34.
See Lo, supra note 4.
35.
LindvallO.KokaiaZ., “Prospects of Stem Cell Therapy for Replacing Dopamine Neurons in Parkinson's Disease,”Trends in Pharmacological Sciences30, no. 5 (2009): 260–267.
36.
Institute of Medicine, Responsible Research: A Systems Approach to Protecting Research Participants (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2003).
37.
National Academy of Sciences, “Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research,”National Academy Press, available at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11278> (last visited April 5, 2010).
38.
National Institutes of Health, “Notice of Actions under the Nih Guidelines for Rsearch Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules,”Federal Register65 (2000): 60627–332.
39.
ScharschmidtT.LoB., “Clinical Trial Design Issues Raised During Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee Review of Gene Transfer Protocols,”Human Gene Therapy17, no. 4 (2006): 448–454.
40.
National Cancer Institute, “The Central Institutional Review Board Initiative,”available at <http://www.ncicirb.org/> (last visited April 5, 2010).
TullyS., “The Party's Over,”Fortune, June 26 2000, 156.
43.
SteinbrookR., “The Gelsinger Case,” in Emanuel, supra note 18, at 110–120.
44.
See Lo, supra note 4.
45.
BergJ. W.LidzC. W.AppelbaumP. S., Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice, 2nd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).
46.
See Lo, supra note 4.
47.
WoodsongC.KarimQ. A., “A Model Designed to Enhance Informed Consent: Experiences from the Hiv Prevention Trials Network,”American Journal of Public Health95, no. 3 (2005): 412–9.
48.
National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants (Rockville, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission, 2001).
49.
See Hyun, 2007 and Lo, 2008, supra note 4.
50.
See Steinbrook, supra note 43; CouzinJ.KaiserJ., “Gene Therapy: As Gelsinger Case Ends, Gene Therapy Suffers Another Blow,”Science307, no. 5712 (2005): 1028; FoxR. C.SwazeyJ. P., Spare Parts (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).
51.
LoB.FieldM.J., Conflicts of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Clinical Practice (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2009).
52.
WoodA. J., “Progress and Deficiencies in the Registration of Clinical Trials.”N. Engl. J. Med. 360, no. 8 (2009): 824–30.