LoB.KriegsteinA.GradyD., “Clinical Trials in Stem Cell Transplantation: Guidelines for Scientific and Ethical Review,”Clinical Trials5, no. 5 (2008): 517–522; LoB., “Case-Based Reasoning in Stem Cell Clinical Trials: The Case of Parkinson Disease,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics38, no. 2 (2010); MagnusD., “Translating Stem Cell Research: Challenges at the Research Frontier,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics38, no. 2 (2010).
2.
National Academy of Sciences, Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2005).
3.
National Academy of Sciences, 2007 Amendments to the National Academies' Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2007).
4.
National Academy of Sciences, 2008 Amendments to the National Academies' Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2008).
See International Society for Stem Cell Research, “Guidelines for the Conduct of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research,”available at <http://www.isscr.org/guidelines/index.htm> (last visited April 7, 2010).
MathewsD. J.SugarmanJ.BokH.BlassD. M.CoyleJ.T.DugganP.FinkleJ.GreelyH. T.HillisA.HokeA.JohnsonR.JohnstonM.KahnJ.KerrD.KurtzbergJ.LiaoS. M.McDonaldJ. W.McKhannG.NelsonK. B.RaoM.RegenbergA.SiegelA. W.SmithK.SolterD.SongH.VescoviAYoungW.GearhartJ. D.FadenR., “Cell-Based Interventions for Neurologic Conditions: Ethical Challenges for Early Human Trials,”Neurology71, no. 4 (2008): 1–6.
12.
SugarmanJ.McCroryD. C.PowellD.KrasnyA.AdamsB.BallE.CassellC., “Empirical Research on Informed Consent,”Hastings Center Report29, no. 1 (1999): S1–S42.
13.
SugarmanJ.KassN. E.GoodmanS. N.PerentesisP.FernandesP.FadenR. R., “What Patients Say About Medical Research,”IRB20, no. 4 (1998): 1–7.
14.
KingN. M. P., “Rewriting the ‘Points to Consider’: The Ethical Impact of Guidance Document Language,”Human Gene Therapy10, no. 1 (1999): 133–139.
15.
SugarmanJ.LavoriP. W.BoegerM.CainC.EdsonR.MorrisonV.YehS. S., “Evaluating the Quality of Informed Consent,”Clinical Trials2, no. 1 (2005): 1–8.
16.
TaylorH. A.ChaissonL.SugarmanJ., “Enhancing Communication Among Data Monitoring Committees and Institutional Review Boards,”Clinical Trials5, no. 3 (2008): 277–282.
17.
ZettlerP.WolfL.LoB., “Establishing Procedures for Institutional Oversight of Stem Cell Research,”Academic Medicine82, no. 1 (2007): 6–10; SugarmanJ.SiegelA., “How to Determine Whether Existing Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Can Be Used Ethically,”Cell Stem Cell3, no. 3 (2008): 238–239; SugarmanJ.SiegelA. W., “When Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Fail to Meet Consent Standards,”Science322, no. 5900 (2008): 379.
18.
LevineC.FadenR.GradyC.HammerschmidtD.EckenwilerL., and J. Sugarman, on behalf of the Consortium to Examine Clinical Research Ethics, “‘Special Scrutiny’: A Targeted Form of Research Protocol Review,”Annals of Internal Medicine140, no. 3 (2004): 220–223.
National Institutes of Health (NIH), Gene Therapy Policy Conference: Prenatal Gene Transfer: Scientific, Medical, and Ethical Issues, January 7–8, 1999, available at <http://oba.od.nih.gov/oba/rac/gtpcconc.pdf> (last visited April 7, 2010); SugarmanJ., “Ethical Considerations in Leaping from Bench to Bedside,”Science285, no. 5436 (1999): 2071–2072.