See ZadekS., “The Path to Corporate Responsibility,”Harvard Business Review82, no. 12 (2004): 125–132.
2.
See HirschhornN., “Corporate Social Responsibility and the Tobacco Industry: Hope or Hype?”Tobacco Control13, no. 2 (2003): 447–543.
3.
See SmithE. A.MaloneR. E., “Thinking the ‘Unthinkable’: Why Philip Morris Considered Quitting,”Tobacco Control12, no. 2 (2003): 208–213, at 208.
4.
See World Health Organization Tobacco Free Initiative, Tobacco Industry and Corporate Responsibility … An Inherent Contradiction, February 2003, available at <http://www.who.int/tobacco/media/en/tob-industry.pdf> (last visited October 14, 2009).
5.
See SzczypkaG.WakefieldM. A.EmeryS.Terry-McElrathY. M.FlayB. R.ChaloupkaF. J., “Working to Make an Image: An Analysis of Three Philip Morris Corporate Image Media Campaigns,”Tobacco Control16, no. 5 (2007): 344–350; ThomsonG., Action on Smoking and Health, Trust Us, We're Socially Responsible: The TRUTH Behind British American's Tobacco NZ's Corporate Social Responsibility Reports, September 2005, available at <http://www.ash.org.nz/pdf/TobaccoIndustry/Conduct/ash-batnz.pdf> (last visited October 14, 2009).
6.
See WakefieldM.McCleodK.PerryC. L., ““Stay Away from Them Until You're Old Enough to Make a Decision”: Tobacco Company Testimony about Youth Smoking Initiation”, Tobacco Control15, Supplement IV (2006): iv44–iv53; MandelL. L.Aguinaga BialousS.GlantzS. A., “Avoiding ‘Truth’: Tobacco Industry Promotion of Life Skills Training,”Journal of Adolescent Health39, no. 6 (2006): 868–879; LandmanA.LingP. M.GlantzS. A., “Tobacco Industry Youth Smoking Prevention Programs: Protecting the Industry and Hurting Tobacco Control,”American Journal of Public Health92, no. 6 (2002): 917–930.
7.
See MahoodG., Tobacco Industry Denormalization, Telling the Truth about the Tobacco Industry's Role in the Tobacco Epidemic, March 2004, at 1, available at <http://www.nsra-adnf.ca/cms/file/pdf/Denormalization_English_Booklet.pdf> (last visited October 14, 2009); CollinJ.GilmoreA., “Corporate (Anti)Social (Ir)Responsibility: Transnational Tobacco Companies and the Attempted Subversion of Global Health Policy,”Global Social Policy2, no. 3 (2002): 354–360, at 355.
8.
See Zadek, supra note 1.
9.
See FriedmanL. C., “Philip Morris's Website and Commercials Use New Language to Mislead the Public Into Believing It Has Changed Its Stance on Smoking and Disease,”Tobacco Control16, no. 9 (2007), available at <http://www.tobaccocontrol.com/cgi/content/full/16/6/e9> (last visited October 14, 2009); YangJ. S., “Working to Shape What Society's Expectations of Us Should Be: Philip Morris's Societal Alignment Strategy,”Tobacco Control17, no. 6 (2008): 391–398.
10.
See Friedman, supra note 9.
11.
See Yang, supra note 9.
12.
See SullivanL.TilsonM.TrainingProgramCentreConsultation, Tobacco Industry Denormalization Pack, March 2005, available at <http://www.ptcc-cfc.on.ca/upload/RDS_0093.pdf> (last visited October 14, 2009); Mahood, supra note 7; AshleyM. J.CohenJ. E., “What the Public Thinks about the Tobacco Industry and Its Products,”Tobacco Control12, no. 4 (2003): 396–400, at 399.
13.
See Sullivan, supra note 12, at 4; Mahood, supra note 7, at 1.
14.
See Mahood, supra note 7, at 5.
15.
See LeatherdaleS. T.SparksR.KirshV. A., “Beliefs about Tobacco Industry (Mal)Practices and Youth Smoking Behavior: Insight for Future Tobacco Control Campaigns,”Cancer Causes Control17, no. 5 (2006): 705–711 at 705; see Mahood, supra note 7, at 5.
16.
See SullivanTilson, supra note 12, at 10–11, 16; Mahood, supra note 7, at 15–16; GoldmanL. K.GlantzS. A., “Evaluation of Antismoking Advertising Campaigns,”JAMA279, no. 10 (1998): 772–777, at 774–775.
17.
See FriedmanL. C.DaynardR. A.BanthinC. N., “How Tobacco-Friendly Science Escapes Scrutiny in the Courtroom,”American Journal of Public Health95, Supplement I (2005): S16–S20 (discussing the tobacco industry's use of “junk science”).
18.
See Sullivan, supra note 12 at 11; Mahood, supra note 7, at 15.
19.
See BernatD. H.EricksonD. J.WidomeR.PerryC. L.ForsterJ. L., “Adolescent Smoking Trajectories: Results From a Population-Based Cohort Study,”Journal of Adolescent Health, 43, no. 4 (2008): 334–340; Sullivan, supra note 12, at 6, 18; Goldman, supra note 16.
20.
See Mahood, supra note 7, at 4; GoldmanGlantz, supra note 16, at 775.
21.
See GoldmanGlantz, supra note 16, at 776.
22.
See Bernat, supra note 19.
23.
See LingP. M.NeilandsT. B.GlantzS. A., “The Effect of Support for Action against the Tobacco Industry on Smoking among Young Adults,”American Journal of Public Health97, no. 8 (2007): 1449–1456.
24.
See HammondD.FongG. T.ZannaM. P.ThrasherJ. F.BorlandR., “Tobacco Denormalization and Industry Beliefs among Smokers from Four Countries,”American Journal of Preventative Medicine31, no. 3 (2006): 225–232; Mahood, supra note 7, at 15.
25.
See Mahood, supra note 7, at 9.
26.
See SmithMalone, supra note 3, at 211.
27.
United States v. Philip Morris, et al., No. 99-CV-2296 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 22, 1999).
U.S. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 449 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2006).
31.
Id., at 851–907.
32.
Id., at 146–308.
33.
Id., at 308–384.
34.
Id., at 430–561.
35.
Id., at 561–692.
36.
Id., at 692–801.
37.
Id., at 801–839.
38.
U.S. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 11008 (D.C. Cir. 2009). The appeals court did reverse the district court's decision on one of the remedies it had ordered and on other minor points, but left intact its findings of fact and law regarding the counts of racketeering, conspiracy and fraud.
39.
See GuardinoS. D.DaynardR. A., “Tobacco Industry Lawyers as ‘Disease Vectors,’”Tobacco Control16, no. 4 (2007): 224–228; GuardinoS. D.DaynardR. A., “Punishing Tobacco Industry Misconduct: The Case for Exceeding a Single Digit Ration between Punitive and Compensatory Damages,”University of Pittsburgh Law Review67, no. 1 (2005): 38–63.
ReifH., 3rd Tobacco Scientific Meeting Bergerac, October 20, 1999, Bates No. 2505792374, available at <http://legacylibrary.ucsf.edu/tid/acj77a00> (last visited October 14, 2009).
43.
Id.
44.
“The Tobacco Industry and Its Impact on Scientific and Medical Attitudes and Opinion – A BAT View,” April 8, 1982, Bates No. 680585768, available at <http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/rnb77a00> (last visited October 14, 2009).
Web Site Backgrounder, September 20, 1999, Bates No. 2076742780–2076742781, available at <http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/gpg77a00> (accessed last visited October 14, 2009).
53.
McDanielP. A.MaloneR. E., “The Role of Corporate Credibility in Legitimizing Disease Promotion,”American Journal of Public Health99, no. 3 (2009): 452–461.
Letter from William Kloepfer to Donald K Hoel regarding February meeting of ETS Advisory Group, March 24, 1987, available at <http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/jnc77a00> (last visited October 14, 2009); Summary Analysis of Strategic Alternatives, October 17, 1994, available at <http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/exd77a00> (last visited October 14, 2009).
Lorillard Corporate Communication Project, Bates No. 82579120, 82579115, available at <http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/shc77a00> (last visited October 14, 2009) (emphasis in original).
Trial testimony of John P. Rupp October 28, 2004 [a.m.], United States of America v. Philip Morris USA Inc., October 28, 2004, at 1183, available at <http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/RUPPJ102804AM.html> (last visited March 26, 2009; access restricted).
66.
ElyR. L. O., “Letter from RLO Ely to E Pepples Enclosing Lee's Latest Report to the TAC,” June 19, 1981, available at <http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/ylb77a00> (last visited October 14, 2009).
67.
Id., at Bates No. 521024595.
68.
Trial testimony of John P. Rupp October 28, 2004 [a.m.], United States of America v. Philip Morris USA Inc., October 28, 2004, at 1184, available at <http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/RUPPJ102804AM.html> (last visited March 26, 2009; access restricted).
69.
U.S. v. Philip Morris U.S.A., Inc., 449 F. Supp.2d 1, 717 (D.D.C. 2006) (citing ColbyF.G.LeeP. B., June 12, 1981, Bates No. 501622432–2433, available at <http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/gtf35a00> (last visited June 2, 2009)).
For a description of Philip Morris's PM21 charitable giving program, see TeslerL. E.MaloneR. E., “Corporate Philanthropy, Lobbying and Public Health Policy,”American Journal of Public Health98, no. 12 (2008): 2123–2133.
“Moderate Indoor Smoking with Adequate Ventilation,” Bates No. 2023895490–2023895491, available at <http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/uad77a00> (last visited October 14, 2009).
Trial testimony of John Graham Robertson, October 25, 2004, United States of America v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., October 25, 2004, at 1159, 1170–71, available at <http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/ROBERTSONJ102504.html> (last visited March 26, 2009; access restricted).
Trial testimony of John Graham Robertson, October 25, 2004, United States of America v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., October 25, 2004, at 1249, available at <http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/ROBERTSONJ102504.html> (last visited March 26, 2009; access restricted).