StosselT. P., “Regulating Academic-Industrial Research Relationships – Solving Problems or Stifling Progress?”New England Journal of Medicine353, no. 10 (2005): 1060–1065.
2.
LasserK. E., “Timing of New Black Box Warnings and Withdrawals for Prescription Medications,”JAMA287, no. 17 (2002): 2215–2220.
3.
MooreT. J., “Serious Adverse Drug Events Reported to the Food and Drug Administration, 1998–2005,”Archives of Internal Medicine167, no. 16 (2007): 1752–1759.
4.
CollinsJ. and PorrasJ. I., Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies (New York: HarperCollins, 2004).
5.
WyniaM. K., “Public Health, Public Trust and Lobbying,”American Journal of Bioethics7, no. 6 (2007): 4–7, at6.
6.
BrodyH., Hooked: Ethics, the Medical Profession and the Pharmaceutical Industry (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.: 2007): at 342.
7.
RidkerP. M. and TorresJ., “Reported Outcomes in Major Cardiovascular Clinical Trials Funded by For-Profit and Not-for-Profit Organizations: 2000–2005,”JAMA295, no. 19 (2006): 2270–2276.
8.
Als-NielsenB., “Association of Funding and Conclusions in Randomized Drug Trials”, JAMA290, no. 7 (2003): 921–928; DjulbegovicB., “The Uncertainty Principle and Industry-Sponsored Research”, The Lancet356, no. 9230 (2000): 635–638.
9.
BeroL., “Factors Associated with Findings of Published Trials of Drug-Drug Comparisons: Why Some Statins Appear More Efficacious Than Others,”Public Library of Science4, no. 6 (2007): 1–10.
10.
Id.
11.
LexchinJ., “Pharmaceutical Industry Sponsorship and Research Outcome and Quality: Systematic Review”, BMJ326, no. 7400 (2006): 1167–1170.
12.
BekelmanJ. E., “Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research”, JAMA289, no. 4 (2003): 454–456.
13.
DjulbegovicB., “The Uncertainty Principle and Industry-Sponsored Research,”The Lancet356, no. 9230 (2000): 635–638; see Lexchin, supra note 11; Als-Nielsen, supra note 8; KjaergardL. L. and GluudC., “Funding, Disease Area, and Internal Validity of Hepatobiliary Randomized Controlled Trials”, American Journal of Gastroenterology97, no. 11 (2002): 2708–2713.
14.
See Als-Nielsen, supra note 8.
15.
MoherD., “Assessing the Quality of Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials: Implications for the Conduct of MetaAnalyses”, Health Technology Assessment3, no. 12 (1999), available at <http://www.hta.ac.uk/fullmono/mon312.pdf> (last visited July 2, 2009).
16.
ChanA. W., “Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials: Comparison of Protocols to Published Articles,”JAMA291 (2004): 2457–2465; RennieD., “Thyroid Storm”, JAMA277, no. 15 (1997): 1238–1243.
17.
SmithR., “Medical Journals Are an Extension of the Marketing Arm of Pharmaceutical Companies,”Public Library of Science Medicine2, no. 5 (2005): 364–366.
18.
LaineC., “Clinical Trial Registration: Looking Back and Moving Ahead,”JAMA298, no. 3 (2007): 93–94.
19.
BlumenthalD., “Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Science: Evidence from a National Survey of Faculty,”JAMA277, no. 15 (1997): 1224–1228.
20.
See Lexchin, supra note 11.
21.
BeroL. A. and RennieD., “Influences on the Quality of Published Drug Studies,”International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care12, no. 2 (1996): 209–237; SaferD. J., “Design and Reporting Modifications in Industry-Sponsored Comparative Psychopharmacology Trials”, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease190, no. 9 (2002): 583–592; see Smith, supra note 17.
22.
JohansenH. K. and G0tzscheP. C., “Problems in the Design and Reporting of Trials of Antifungal Agents Encountered During Meta-analysis,”JAMA282, no. 18 (1999): 1752–1759.
23.
Id.
24.
PsatyB. M.WeissN. S. and FurbergC. D., “Recent Trials in Hypertention: Compelling Science or Commercial Speech?”JAMA295, no. 14 (2006): 1704–1706.
25.
See Safer, supra note 21.
26.
See Bero, supra note 9.
27.
See Brody, supra note 6.
28.
LindT., “Esomeprazole Provides Improved Acid Control vs. Omeprazole in Patients with Symptoms of Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease,”Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics14, no. 7 (2000): 861–867.
29.
See Djulbegovic, supra note 13.
30.
PsatyB. M. and RennieD., “Clinical Trial Investigators and Their Prescribing Patterns,”JAMA295, no. 23 (2006): 2787–2790.
31.
BrophyJ. M., “Selling Safety — Lessons from Muraglitazar,”JAMA294, no. 20 (2005): 2633–2635 at 20.
32.
KaulS. and DiamondG. A., “Good Enough: A Primer on the Analysis and Interpretation of Noninferiority Trials,”Annals of Internal Medicine145, no. 1 (2006): 62–69.
33.
RossD. B., “The FDA and the Case of Ketek,”New England Journal of Medicine356, no. 16 (2007): 1601–1604.
34.
FarahaniP., “Clinical Data Gap between Phase III Clinical Trials (Pre-Marketing) and Phase IV (Post-Marketing) Studies: Evaluation of Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis,”Canadian Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 12, no. 3 (2005).
35.
See Brophy, supra note 31.
36.
Zinman, “The Effect of Adding Exenatide to a Thiazolidinedione in Suboptimally Controlled Type 2 Diabetes,”Annals of Internal Medicine146, no. 7 (2007): 477–485. (cited in MalozowskiS., “Exenatide in Combination Therapy: Small Study, Big Market, and Many Unanswered Questions”, Annals of Internal Medicine146, no. 7 [2007]: 477–485).
37.
See Psaty and Rennie, supra note 30.
38.
CurfmanG. D.MorriseyS. and DrazenJ. M., “Expression of Concern Reaffirmed,”New England Journal of Medicine354, no. 11 (2006): 1193.
39.
HrachovecJ. B. and MoraM., “Reporting of 6-month vs 12-month Data in a Clinical Trial of Celecoxib,”JAMA286, no. 19 (2001): 2398–2399; MalhotraS., “COX-2 Inhibitors: A CLASS Act or Just VIGORously Promoted?”MedGenMed6 (2004), available at <http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=15208519#r25> (last visited June 22, 2009).
40.
ReidI. R., “Addition of Monofluorophosphate to Estrogen Therapy in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A randomized Controlled trial”, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism92, no. 7 (2007): 2446–2452.
41.
RossouwJ. E., “Risks and Benefits of Estrogen Plus Progestin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women: Principal Results From the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial,”JAMA288, no. 3 (2002): 321–333.
42.
EpsteinA. E., “Mortality Following Ventricular Arrhythmia Suppression by Encainide, Flecainide, and Moricizine after Myocardial Infarction: The Original Design Concept of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST),”JAMA270, no. 20 (1993): 2451–2455.
43.
LagoR. M.SinghP. P. and NestoR. W., “Congestive Heart Failure and Cardiovascular Death in Patients with Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Given Thiazolidinediones: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials,”The Lancet370, no. 9593 (2007): 1129–1136.
44.
KesslerD. A., “Therapeutic-Class Wars — Drug Promotion in a Competitive Marketplace,”New England Journal of Medicine331, no. 20 (1994): 1350–1353.
45.
See Psaty and Rennie, supra note 30.
46.
See Kessler, supra note 44.
47.
CaulfieldT. A., “Legal and Ethical Issues Associated with Patient Recruitment in Clinical Trials: The Case of Competitive Environment,”Health Law Review13, nos. 2–3 (2005): 58–61.
RennieD. and FlanaginA.“Authorship! Authorship! Guests, Ghosts, Grafters, and the Two-Sided Coin,”JAMA271, no. 6 (1994): 469–471.
51.
See Eichenwald and Kolata, supra note 49.
52.
See Ross, supra note 33.
53.
See Eichenwald and Kolata, supra note 49; HarrisG. and RobertsJ., “After Sanctions, Doctors Get Drug Company Pay,”New York Times, June 3, 2007, available at <http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/03/health/03docs.html> (last visited July 2, 2009); Ross, supra note 33.
54.
See Eichenwald and Kolata, supra note 49.
55.
See Harris and Roberts, supra note 53.
56.
See Als-Nielsen, supra note 8.
57.
HolmesD. R., “Conflict of Interest,”American Heart Journal147, no. 2 (2004): 228–237.
58.
See Brody, supra note 6, at 2.
59.
MelanderH., “Evidence B(i)ased Medicine — Selective Reporting from Studies Sponsored by Pharmaceutical Industry: Review of Studies in New Drug Applications,”BMJ326, no. 7400 (2003): 1171–1173.
60.
KnoxK. S., “Reporting and Disseminatino of Industry versus Non-Profit Sponsored Economic Analyses of Six Novel Drugs Used in Oncology,”Annals of Oncology11, no. 12 (2000): 1591–1595.
61.
See Brody, supra note 6, at 119.
62.
SchaferA, “Biomedical Conflicts of Interest: A Defence of the Sequestration Thesis-Learning from the Cases of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy,”Journal of Medical Ethics30, no. 1 (2004): 8–24.
63.
See Rennie and Flanagin, supra note 50.
64.
PucknerW. A. and LeechP., “The Introduction of New Drugs,”JAMA93, no. 21 (1929): 1627–1630.
65.
RossJ. S., “Guest Authorship and Ghostwriting in Publications Related to Rofecoxib,”JAMA299, no. 15 (2008): 1800–1812.
WoodA.GradyC. and EmanuelE. J., “Regional Ethics Organizations for Protection of Human Research Participants,”Nature Medicine10, no. 12 (2004): 1283–1288.
73.
Brody, supra note 6; KrimskyS., Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003).