FisherW. W.SyedT., “Global Justice in Healthcare: Developing Drugs for the Developing World,”University of California Davis Law Review40, no. 3 (2007) 581–678; MercurioB., “Resolving the Public Health Crisis in the Developing World: Problems and Barriers of Access to Essential Medicines,”Northwest University Journal of International Human Rights5, no. 1 (Fall 2006): 1–80; BlackR. E., “Where and Why Are 10 Million Children Dying Every Year?”The Lancet361, no. 9376 (2003): 2226–2234.
GadM. O., “Impact of Multinational Enterprises on Multilateral Rulemaking: The Pharmaceutical Industry and the TRIPS Uruguay Round Negotiations,”Law and Business Review of the Americas9, no. 4 (Fall 2003): 667–697; FerreiraL., “Access to Affordable HIV/AIDS Drugs: The Human Rights Obligations of Multinational Pharmaceutical Corporations,”Fordham Law Review71, no. 3 (December 2002): 1133–1179.
6.
CalfeeJ. E.BateR., “Pharmaceuticals and the Worldwide HIV Epidemic: Can a Stakeholder Model Work?”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing23, no. 2 (2004): 140–152; “HIV Drugs for Africa Diverted to Europe,”Washington Post, October 3, 2002, at A10.
7.
WollensackA. F., “Closing the Constant Garden: The Regulation and Responsibility of U.S. Pharmaceutical Companies Doing Research on Human Subjects in Developing Nations,”Washington University Global Studies Law Review6 (2007): 747–771; MooreJ. A., “Parallel Trade, Unparallel Laws: An Examination of the Pharmaceutical Parallel Trade Laws of the United States, The European Trade Union, and the World Trade Organization,”Richmond Journal of Global Law and Business6, no. 1 (2006): 77–93; AngellM., “The Truth about Drug Companies,”Jurimetrics Journal45, no. 4 (2005): 465–471.
8.
VaughanS. V., “Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceuticals under TRIPS: What Standard of Compensation?”Hastings International and Comparative Law Review25, no. 1 (2001): 87–110.
9.
See Moore, supra note 7.
10.
See Ferreira, supra note 5.
11.
LiY., “Pushing for Greater Protection: The Trend toward Greater Protection of Intellectual Property in the Chinese Software Industry and the Implications for the Rule of Law in China,”University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law23, no. 4 (2002): 637–661; MaskusK. E., “The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Encouraging Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Transfer,”Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law9, no. 1 (1998): 109–152.
12.
SchwartzM. L., “International Legal Protection for Victims of Environmental Abuse,”Yale Journal of International Law18, no. 1 (1993): 355–387.
13.
GerhartP. M., “Reflections: Beyond Compliance Theory – TRIPS as a Substantive Issue,”Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law32, no. 3 (2000): 357–385.
14.
BirdR. C., “Defending Intellectual Property Rights in the BRIC Economies,”American Business Law Journal43, no. 2 (2006): 317–363; Chien-HaleE., “Asserting U.S. Intellectual Property Rights in China: Expansion of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction?”Journal of the Copyright Society U.S.A.44, no. 3 (1997): 198–230.
15.
Id. (Bird).
16.
Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement, April 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, Legal Instruments – Results of the Uruguay Round, 33 I.L.M. 81 (1994).
17.
YalamanchiliV., “State of India's TRIPS-Compliant Patent Regime,”Biotechnology Law Report26, no. 3 (2007): 211–225.
18.
Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, 2001, Doc. WT/MIN(01)/DEC/2.
19.
According to Article 31 of TRIPS, a compulsory license may not be issued unless the proposed user has made unsuccessful reasonable efforts to obtain authorization from the rights holder on reasonable commercial terms. Member states can bypass the reasonable efforts requirement in case of a national emergency, extreme urgency, or for public non-commercial use (see Vaughan, supra 8; TRIPS, supra note 16). Furthermore, any compulsory license must be terminated when the need for it ceases and the rights holder must be paid adequate compensation for the license, taking into account the economic value of the authorizations (YuP. K., “The International Enclosure Movement,”Indiana Law Journal8, no. 4 [2007]: 827–907; see TRIPS, supra note 16). The Doha Declaration, written after TRIPS, affirmed the right of nations to issue compulsory licenses and to determine the grounds upon which such licenses may be granted within the confines of TRIPS. For a more detailed discussion of the Doha Declaration, see OuttersonK., “Should Access to Medicines and TRIPS Flexibilities be Limited to Specific Diseases?”American Journal of Law and Medicine34, nos. 2–3 (2008): 279–301; and CahoyD. R., “Confronting Myths and Myopia on the Road From Doha,”Georgia Law Review42, no. 1 (2007): 131–192.
20.
DutfieldG., “Delivering Drugs to the Poor: Will the TRIPS Amendment Help?”American Journal of Law and Medicine34, nos. 203 (2008): 107–124.
21.
Collins-ChaseC. T., “The Case Against TRIPS-Plus Protection in Developing Countries Facing AIDS Epidemics,”University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law29, no. 3 (2008): 763–802.
22.
BassN. A., “Implications of the TRIPS Agreement for Developing Countries: Pharmaceutical Patent Laws in Brazil and South Africa in the 21st Century,”George Washington International Law Review34, no. 1 (2002): 191–222.
23.
MansfieldE., “Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study,”Management Science32, no. 2 (1986): 173–181.
24.
CahoyD. R., “Confronting Myths and Myopia on the Road from Doha,”Georgia Law Review42, no. 1 (2007): 131–192.
25.
ChienC., “Cheap Drugs at What Price to Innovation: Does the Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceuticals Hurt Innovation?”Berkeley Technology Law Journal18, no. 3 (2003): 853–907.
26.
SchererF. M., The Economic Effects of Compulsory Patent Licensing (New York: New York University Press, 1977).
27.
OuttersonK., “Should Access to Medicines and TRIPS Flexibilities be Limited to Specific Diseases?”American Journal of Law and Medicine34, nos. 2–3 (2008): 279–301; OuttersonK., “Pharmaceutical Arbitrage: Balancing Access and Innovation in International Prescription Drug Markets,”Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law & Ethics5, no. 1 (2005): 193–291.
28.
Id. (Outterson).
29.
BirdR.CahoyD. R., “The Impact of Compulsory Licensing on Foreign Direct Investment: A Collective Bargaining Approach,”American Business Law Journal45, no. 2 (2008): 283–330; CastellanoR. A., “Patent Law for New Medical Uses of Known Compounds and Pfizer's Viagra Patent,”IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review46, no. 2 (2006): 283–315.
30.
Id. (Castellano), at 289; AllamA., (2002), “Seeking Investment, Egypt Tries Patent Laws,”New York Times, October 4, at W1.
31.
AzizS., “Linking Intellectual Property Rights in Developing Countries with Research and Development, Technology Transfer, and Foreign Direct Investment Policy: A Case Study of Egypt's Pharmaceutical Industry,”ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law10, no. 1 (2003): 1–34.
32.
BentolilaH. L., “Lessons from the United States Trade Policies to Convert a ‘Pirate’: The Case of Pharmaceutical Patents in Argentina,”Yale Journal of Law and Technology5 (2003): 59–102.
33.
CorreaC. M., “TRIPS and Access to Drugs: Toward a Solution for Developing Countries without Manufacturing Capacity,”Emory International Law Review17, no. 2 (2003): 389–406.
BinkertB., “Why the Current Global Intellectual Property Framework under TRIPS Is Not Working,”Intellectual Property Law Bulletin10, no. 2 (2006): 143–162.
36.
BarteltS., “Compulsory Licenses Pursuant to TRIPS Article 31 in the Light of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health,”Journal of World Intellectual Property6, no. 2 (2003): 283–310.
37.
MullenbachE., “The Influence of Disease on the Evolution of U.S. Patent Law and Policy Towards Foreign Patent Laws in the Late Twentieth to Early Twenty-First Century,”Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property7 (2005): 227–248, at 236.
38.
ValachA. P.Jr., “TRIPS Protecting the Rights of Patent Holders and Addressing Public Health Issues in Developing Countries,”Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property4, no. 2 (2005): 156–185.
PhRMA et al. v. President of the Republic of South Africa et al. (1998), High Court of South Africa (Transvaal Provincial Division), available at <http://www.cptech.org/ip/health/sa/pharmasuit.html> (last visited March 26, 2009).
41.
AginamO., “Between Life and Profit: Global Governance and the Trilogy of Human Rights, Public Policy, and Pharmaceutical Patents,”North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation31, no. 4 (2006): 901–921.
42.
KennedyC. R.de B. HarrisF. H.LordM., “Integrating Public Policy and Public Affairs in a Pharmaceutical Marketing Program: The AIDS Pandemic,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing23, no. 2 (2004): 128–139.
43.
See Castellano, supra note 29.
44.
See Allam, supra note 30.
45.
El-KatatneyE., “A Tough Pill to Swallow,”Business Today (Egypt), August 1, 2002.
46.
See TRIPS, supra note 16.
47.
TorranceA. W., “Patents to the Rescue – Disasters and Patent Law,”DePaul Journal of Health Care Law10, no. 3 (2007): 309–358.
48.
YuP. K., “The International Enclosure Movement,”Indiana Law Journal82, no. 4 (2007): 827–907.
49.
See Edelman, supra note 34; LippertO., “One Trip to the Dentist Is Enough: Reasons to Strengthen Intellectual Property Rights through the Free Trade of the Americas,”Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal9, no. 1 (1998): 241–300.
50.
Id. (Edelman).
51.
See Mercurio, supra note 1.
52.
Intellectual Property Law (Brazil) Effective as of May 15, 1997, at art. 68, available at <http://www.araripe.com.br/law9279eng.htm> (last visited March 26, 2009).
53.
MotaS. A., “TRIPS: Ten Years of Disputes at the WTO,”Computer Law Review and Technology Journal9, no. 1 (2005): 455–478.
54.
See BirdCahoy, supra note 29.
55.
Id.;PassarelliC.TertoV.Jr., “Good Medicine: Brazil's Multifront War on AIDS,”NACLA Report on the Americas35, no. 5 (2002): 35–52.
56.
BrennanT. M., “The United States and Brazil Agree to Disagree over Brazil's Patent Law,”Intellectual Property and Technology Law Journal13, no. 9 (2001): 1–6.
57.
Id.
58.
See BirdCahoy, supra note 29.
59.
Looking back, it is possible to conclude that the dispute between Brazil and the United States was not even necessary. According to one commentator, the Brazilian government could have produced the needed drugs in state owned labs for free, thereby falling under the “public non-commercial use” exception of TRIPS Article 31 (WilsonC. A. D., “The TRIPS Agreement: Is it Beneficial to the Developing World or Simply a Tool Used to Protect Pharmaceutical Profits for Developed World Manufacturers?”Journal of Technology Law and Policy10, no. 2 [2005]: 243–264.) Perhaps an equally important lesson from Brazil's campaign, then, is to avoid entering such public disputes in the first place.
60.
CotterT. M., “Market Fundamentalism and the TRIPS Agreement,”Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal22, no. 2 (2004): 307–342.
WeismanS. R.BarrionuevoAlexei, “Failure of Global Trade Talks Is Traced to the Power of Farmers,”New York Times, July 27, (2006), at C1.
66.
FidlerD. P., “Neither Science Nor Shamans: Globalization of Markets and Health in the Developing World,”Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies7, no. 1 (1999): 191–224.
67.
AginamO., “Beyond Shamanism: The Relevance of African Traditional Medicine in Global Health Policy,”Medicine and Law26, no. 2 (2007): 191–201.
68.
OguamanamC., “Patents and Traditional Medicine: Digital Capture, Creative Legal Interventions and the Dialectics of Knowledge Transformation,”Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies15, no. 2 (2008): 489–528.
69.
RosenbergT., “When a Pill Is Not Enough,”New York Times, August 6, 2006, at 41.
70.
Id.
71.
See KennedyHarrisLord, supra note 42.
72.
See Rosenberg, supra note 69.
73.
HeywoodM., “Preventing Mother-to-Child HIV Transmission in South Africa: Background, Strategies, and Out-Comes of the Treatment Action Campaign Case against the Minister of Health,”South Africa Journal on Human Rights19 (2003): 278–315.
See Mercurio, supra note 1; Editorial, supra note 76.
79.
See PassarelliTerto, supra note 55.
80.
ClarkS. C., “Never in a Vacuum: Learning from the Thai Fight against HIV,”William and Mary Journal of Women and the Law13, no. 2 (2007): 593–620.
81.
MarquesU. R. Q., “Brazil's AIDS Controversy: Antiretroviral Drugs, Breaking Patents, and Compulsory Licensing,”Food and Drug Law Journal60, no. 3 (2005): 471–577.
Multilateral: Convention on Biological Diversity, Rio de Janeiro, June 5, 1992, pmbl., 31 I.L.M. 822, at 826, available at <http://www.biodiv.org/doc/legal/cbd-un-en.pdf> (last visited March 26, 2009).
86.
CurciJ., “The New Challenges to the International Patentability of Biotechnology: Legal Relations between the WTO Treaty on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights and the Convention on Biological Diversity,”International Law and Management Review2, no. 1 (2005): 1–42.