LongJ. C., “Human Genetic Variation: The Mechanisms and Results of Microevolution,” Understanding Race: A Project of the American Anthropological Association,”available at <http://www.understandingrace.org/resources/papers_activity.html> (last visited July 18, 2008); LopezI. H., “The Social Construction of Race: Some Observations on Illusion, Fabrication, and Choice,”Harvard Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Law Review29, no. 1 (1994): 1–62.
2.
AdlerN., “Reaching for a Healthier Life: Facts on Socioeconomic Status and Health in the U.S.,”2007, The John D. and Catherine T. Macarthur Foundation Research Network on Socioeconomic Status and Health; SmedleyB. D.SmithA. Y.NelsonA. R., eds., Unequal Treatment: Understanding Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care, Institute of Medicine, 2003.
3.
MarchR., “Pharmacogenomics: The Genomics of Drug Response,”Yeast17, no. 1, (2000): 16–21.
4.
See Gonzalez BurchardE., “The Importance of Race and Ethnic Background in Biomedical Research and Clinical Practice,”New England Journal of Medicine348, no. 12 (March 20, 2003): 1170–1172; see also DaarA. S.SingerP., “Pharmacogenomics and Geographical Ancestry: Implications for Drug Development and Global Health,”Nature Reviews Genetics6, no. 3 (October 2005): 241–246.
5.
See BowcockA., “High Resolution of Human Evolutionary Trees with Polymorphic Microsatellites,”Nature368, no. 6470 (1994): 455–457; BowcockA., “Drift, Admixture, and Selection in Human Evolution: A Study with DNA Polymorphisms,”Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences88, no. 3 (1991): 839–843.
6.
RosenburgN., “Genetic Structure of Human Populations,”Science298, no. 5602 (2002): 2381–2385; BamshadM. J., “Human Population Genetic Structure and Inference of Group Membership,”American Journal of Human Genetics72, no. 3 (2003): 578–589; see also MountainJ., “Multilocus Genotypes: A Tree of Individuals, and Human Evolutionary History,”American Journal of Human Genetics61, no. 3 (1997): 705–718.
7.
RischN., “Categorization of Humans in Biomedical Research: Genes, Race and Disease,”Genome Biology3, no. 7 (2002): 1–12.
8.
See BurchardGonzalez, supra note 4.
9.
GravesJ. L., “What We Know and What We Don't Know: Human Genetic Variation and the Social Construction of Race,” June 7, 2006, Social Science Research Council Is Race Real?, available at <http://raceandgenomics.ssrc.org/Graves/> (last visited May 20, 2008).
10.
Bolnick notes the following: [A]lthough this body of work emphasizes the individual as the crucial unit of analysis, individual ancestry inference is closely tied to our understanding of human groups and the distribution of genetic variation among them. Inferring an individual's genetic ancestry entails deciding that his or her DNA was inherited from a certain group or groups, and that cannot be accomplished unless one first distinguishes groups that differ genetically in some way. Thus, even such individually-oriented genetic research has implications for our understanding of race and the pattern of human biological diversity.
11.
BolnickD., “Individual Ancestry Inference and the Reification of Race as a Biological Phenomenon,” in KoenigB.Soo-Jin LeeS.RichardsonS., eds., Revisiting Race in a Genomic Age (forthcoming 2008) (manuscript at 2, on file with author).
12.
Bolnick states that the fact that structure identifies a particular number of clusters is insignificant: It does so simply because the user told it to do so. What is more important is that structure provides a way to determine the value of K that is most appropriate for the dataset in question (i.e. the most likely number of clusters or populations represented.) The ‘best’ value of K is the one that maximizes the probability of observing that set of data…. However, it is not entirely straightforward to determine the true number of genetic clusters in a given dataset for three reasons…[:] First, because it is computationally difficult, … structure provides only an approximation. Second, if a dataset is complex, different runs of structure may produce substantially different results. Third, the underlying model used in the structure program is not appropriate for all datasets. Id., at 7–8; manuscript on file with author.
13.
CooperR. S., “Race and Genomics,”New England Journal of Medicine348, no. 12 (March 20, 2003): 1166–1170.
14.
Id.
15.
WatkinsW. S., “Genetic Variation among World Populations: Inferences from 100 Alu Insertion Polymorphisms,”Genome Research13, no. 7 (2003): 1607–1618.
16.
DusterT., “Race and Reification in Science,”Science307, no. 5712 (2005): 1050–1051.
17.
FranciosaJ. A.TaylorA. L., “African-American Heart Failure Trial (A-HeFT): Rationale, Design, and Methodology,”Journal of Cardiac Failure8, no. 3 (2002): 128–135.
18.
TaylorA. L., “Combination of Isosorbide Dinitrate and Hydralazine in Blacks with Heart Failure,”New England Journal of Medicine351, no. 20 (November 11, 2004): 2054–2057.
19.
SapersteinA., “Double Checking the Race Box: Examining Inconsistency between Survey Measures of Observed and Self-Reported Race,”Social Forces85, no. 1 (2006): 57–74; HarrisD. R.SimJ. J., “Who is Multiracial? Assessing the Complexity of Lived Race,”American Sociological Review67, no. 4 (2002): 614–627.
See SankarP.KahnJ., “BiDil Race Medicine or Race Marketing?”Health Affairs455, no. w5 (web exclusive) (October 11, 2005): 455–463.
23.
Gregg BlocheM., “Race-Based Therapeutics,”New England Journal of Medicine351, no. 20 (November 11, 2004): 2035–2037, at 2036.
24.
FerdinandK., “The Isosorbide-Hydralazine Story: Is There a Case for Race-Based Cardiovascular Medicine?”Journal of Clinical Hypertension8, no. 3 (March 2006): 156–158 .
25.
“BiDil African-American Subset Is Surrogate for Genomics, Cmte. Chair Says,”The Pink Sheet67, no. 25 (June 20, 2005).
26.
CollinsF. S., “Foreword,” in Pharmacogenomics: Social, Ethical, and Clinical Dimensions (Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, 2003).
27.
MeadowsM., “The FDA's Drug Review Process: Ensuring Drugs Are Safe and Effective,”FDA Consumer36, no. 4 (July-August 2002): 19–24.
28.
“Dear Colleague”letter from the Department of Health and Human Services, October 26, 1998, available at <http://www.fda.gov/oc/ohrt/irbs/irbletr.html> (last visited May 20, 2008).
29.
The Slaughterhouse Cases, 83 U.S. 36, 71 (1873).
30.
Gruetter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 326 (2003).
31.
Richmond v. J. A. Croson, 488 U.S. 469, 493 (1989).
32.
Id., at 494.
33.
LillquistE.SullivanC., “The Law and Genetics of Racial Profiling in Medicine,”Harvard Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Law Review39, no. 2 (2004): 391–484.
34.
KahnJ., “Genes, Race, and Population: Avoiding a Collision of Categories,”American Journal of Public Health96, no. 11 (2006): 1965–1970.
35.
RobertsD., “Legal Constraints on the Use of Biomedical Research: Toward a Social Justice Framework,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics24, no. 3 (2006): 526–534.
36.
WinickoffD.ObasogieO., “Race-Specific Drugs: Regulatory Trends and Public Policy,”Trends in Pharmacological Sciences29, no. 6 (2008): 277–279.
37.
RadosC., “Advisory Committees: Critical to the FDA's Product Review Process,”FDA Consumer Magazine38, no. 1 (January-February 2004), available at <http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/2004/104_adv.html> (last visited July 17, 2008).