See generally, BatesB. R., “Public Culture and Public Understanding of Genetics: A Focus Group Study,”Public Understanding of Science14, no. 1 (2005): 47–65; Ten EyckT. A., “The Media and Public Opinion on Genetics and Biotechnology: Mirrors, Windows, or Walls?”Public Understanding of Science14, no. 3 (2005): 305–316.
2.
See HoltzmanN. A., “The Quality of Media Reports on Discoveries Related to Human Genetic Diseases,”Community Genetics8, no. 3 (2005): 133–144; MarksL., “Mass Media Framing of Biotechnology News,”Public Understanding of Science16, no. 2 (2007): 183–203.
3.
See generally, Ten EyckT.WillimentM., “The National Media and Things Genetic: Coverage in the New York Times (1971–2001) and the Washington Post (1977–2001),”Science Communication25, no. 2 (2003): 129–152; PetersenA., “Biofantasies: Genetics and Medicine in the Print News Media,”Social Science and Medicine52, no. 8 (2001): 1255–1268; Hornig PriestS., “Public Discource and Scientific Controvery: A Spiral-of-Silence Analysis of Biotechnology Opinion in the United States,”Science Communcication28, no. 2 (2006): 195–215; and KitzingerJ.WilliamsC., “Forecasting Science Futures: Legitimizing Hope and Calming Fears in the Embryo Stem Cell Debate,”Social Science and Medicine61, no. 3 (2005): 731–740.
4.
NelkinD., “Molecular Metaphors: The Gene in Popular Discourse,”Nature Review Genetics2 (2001): 555–559.
5.
News, “‘Black’ Pill: A Good Case of Racial Profiling,”Minneapolis Star Tribune, November 12, 2004, at A18.
6.
NelkinD.LindeeS., The DNA Mystique: The Gene as Cultural Icon (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1995).
7.
WadeN., “Race-Based Medicine Continued…,”New York Times, November 14, 2004, at 12.
8.
CaulfieldT.BubelaT.MurdochC. J., “Myriad and the Mass Media: The Covering of a Gene Patent Controversy,”Genetics in Medicine9, no. 12 (2007): 850–855; BubelaT.CaulfieldT., “Do the Print Media ‘Hype’ Genetic Research?: A Comparison of Newspaper Stories and Peer-Reviewed Research Papers,”Canadian Medical Association Journal170, no. 9 (2004): 1399–1407.
9.
SteinR., “FDA Approves Controversial Heart Medication for Blacks,”Washington Post, June 24, 2005, at A15.
10.
BaileyR., “When Medicine that Discriminates Is Good: Using Race and Ethnicity to Improve Health Care Is Anything but Racist,”Chicago Sun-Times, December 18, 2006, at B2.
11.
RoylanceF. D., “A Sort of Scientific Malpractice: Genetics: Scientists Are Cautioning Doctors against the Use of Race as a Guide in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Research,”Baltimore Sun, October 11, 2004, at 1A.
12.
Eunjung ChaA., “Race Plays Role in New Drug Trials,”Washington Post, July 28, 2003, at A01.
13.
AugeK., “Race Research Moves Cautiously,”The Denver Post, April 19, 2005, at B1.
14.
See, for example, Marantz HenigR., “The Genome in Black and White (and Gray),”New York Times, October 10, 2004, at 47.
15.
RowlandC., “Panel Backs Drug for Blacks,”Boston Globe, June 17, 2005, at E1.
16.
Editorial, “The First Race-Based Medicine,”New York Times, June 19, 2005, at 11.
17.
CaulfieldT., “Nutrigenomics, Popular Representations and the Reification of ‘Race,’”Health Law Review16, no. 3 (2008): 50–57.
18.
HighfieldR., “Selling Science to the Public,”Science289, no. 5476 (2000): 59.
19.
KahnJ., “Raceing Patents/Patenting Race: An Emerging Political Geography of Intellectual Property in Biotechnology,”Iowa Law Review92, no. 2 (2007): 353–416.
20.
ChoM., “Racial and Ethnic Categories in Biomedical Research: There Is No Baby in the Bathwater,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics34, no. 3 (2006): 497–499; EllisonG.SmartA.TuttonR.OutramS.AshcroftR., “Racial Categories in Medicine: A Failure of Evidence-Based Practice?”PLoS Medicine4, no. 9 (2007): 1434–1436.
21.
Editorial, “Improve Access to Heart Drug,”Grand Rapid Press, December 11, 2006, at A6.
22.
SyreS., “Potential vs. Reality,”Boston Globe, June 1, 2005, at D1.
ConditC. M.ParrottR.BatesB. R.BevanJ.AchterP. J., “Exploration of the Impact of Messages about Genes and Race on Lay Attitudes,”Clinical Genetics66, no. 5 (2004): 402–408, 406; see also SingerE.AntonucciT. C.BurmeisterM.CouperM. P.RaghunathanT. E.Van HoewykJ., “Beliefs about Genes and Environment as Determinants of Behavioral Characteristics,”International Journal of Public Opinion19, no. 3 (2007): 331–353.
25.
BatesB. R., “Evaluating Direct-to-Consumer Marketing of Race-Based Pharmacogenomics: A Focus Group Study of Public Understandings of Applied Genomic Medication,”Journal of Health Communication9, no. 6 (2004): 541–559.
26.
For example, see KolataG., “Genes Explain Race Disparity in Response to a Heart Drug,”New York Times, April 29, 2008; BBC News, “Race Differences in Immune Genes,”BBC News, February 29, 2008, available at <http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/health/7270562.stm> (last visited June 3, 2008); and TalagaT., “Race Affects Asthma Tests, Study Finds,”Toronto Star, January 8, 2008, available at <http://www.thestar.com/living/Health/article/292031> (last visited June 3, 2008).
27.
See, for example, BubelaT.CaulfieldT., “Do the Print Media ‘Hype’ Genetic Research?: A Comparison of Newspaper Stories and Peer-Reviewed Research Papers,”Canadian Medical Association Journal170, no. 9 (2004): 1399–1407; and GethingL., “‘Them and Us’: Scientists and the Media — Attitudes and Experiences,”South Africa Medical Journal93, no. 3 (2003): 197–201.