RedonR., “Global Variation in Copy Number in the Human Genome,”Nature444, no. 7118 (2006): 444–454.
9.
WongK., “A Comprehensive Analysis of Common Copy-Number Variations in the Human Genome,”American Journal of Human Genetics80, no. 1 (2007): 91–104.
10.
McPhersonR., “A Common Allele on Chromosome 9 Associated with Coronary Heart Disease,”Science316, no. 5830 (2007): 1488–1491; HelgadottirA., “A Common Variant on Chromosome 9p21 Affects the Risk of Myocardial Infarction,”Science316, no. 5830 (2007): 1491–1493.
11.
McGuireA. L., “The Future of Personal Genomics,”Science317, no. 5845 (2007): 1687.
12.
See ShalowitzMiller, supra note 1; IllesJ., “Discovery and Disclosure of Incidental Findings in Neuroimaging Research,”Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging20, (2004): 743–747; WendlerD.EmanuelE., “The Debate Over Research on Stored Biological Samples: What Do Sources Think?”Archives of Internal Medicine162, no. 13 (2002): 1457–1462.
13.
Id. (Shalowitz and Miller).
14.
See Renegar, supra note 3; RavitskyV.WilfondB., “Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants,”American Journal of Bioethics6, no. 6 (2006): 8–17.
Id. (Ravitzky and Wilfond); National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance, Rockville, MD, 1999; National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Working Group on Reporting Genetic Results in Research Studies: Meeting Summary, Bethesda, MD, 2004, available at <http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/meetings/workshops/gene-results.htm> (last visited February 7, 2008).
17.
ACMG Laboratory Practice Committee Working Group, “ACMG Recommendations for Standards for Interpretation of Sequence Variations,”Genetics in Medicine2, no. 5 (2000): 302–303.
18.
See National Bioethics Advisory Commission, supra note 15.
19.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments,”available at <http://www.cms.hhs.gov/CLIA/> (last visited February 7, 2008).
20.
See RavitzkyWilfond, supra note 14.
21.
See Illes, supra note 2.
22.
TerryS.BoydC., “Researching the Biology of PXE: Partnering in the Process,”American Journal of Medical Genetics106, no. 3 (2001): 177–184; TerryS., “Advocacy Groups as Research Organizations: The PXE International Example,”Nature Reviews Genetics8, no. 2 (2007): 157–164.
23.
ClaytonE., “Informed Consent and Genetic Research,” in RothsteinM., ed., Genetic Secrets: Protecting Privacy and Confidentiality in the Genetic Era (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997): 126–136.
24.
Office for Human Research Protections, Department of Health and Human Services, Guidance on Research Involving Coded Private Information or Biological Specimens, Rockville, MD, 2004, available at <www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/cdebiol.pdf> (last visited February 7, 2008).
25.
See RavitskyWilford, supra note 14.
26.
McGuireA. L., “Research Ethics and the Challenge of Whole Genome Sequencing,”Nature Reviews Genetics9, no. 2 (2007): 152–156.
TaborH.ChoM., “Ethical Implications of Array CGH in Complex Phenotypes: Points to Consider in Research,”Genetics in Medicine9, no. 9 (2007): 626–631; MagnusD.ChoM., “Issues in Oocyte Donation for Stem Cell Research,”Science308, no. 5729 (2006): 1747–1748.