Committee on International Science, Engineering, and Technology, Infectious Disease a Global Threat: Report of the National Science and Technology Council, Washington, D.C., 1995.
2.
FidlerD. P., International Law and Infectious Diseases (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999): at 5.
3.
BurrisS., “Governance, Microgovernance and Health,”Temple Law Review77, no. 2 (2004): 335–61, at 336.
4.
GostinL. O.GableL., “The Human Rights of Persons with Mental Disabilities: A Global Perspective on the Application of Human Rights Principles to Mental Health,”Maryland Law Review63, no. 1 (2004): 20–121.
5.
MannJ. M., “Health and Human Rights,”Journal of Health and Human Rights1, no. 1 (1994): 6–23, at 19; GostinL. O.LazzariniZ., Human Rights and Public Health in the AIDS Pandemic (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997): At 1; GostinL. O., The AIDS Pandemic: Injustice, Complacency, Unfulfilled Expectations (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004): at 67.
6.
MannJ. M., “Medicine and Public Health, Ethics and Human Rights,”Hastings Center Report27, no. 1 (1997): 6–13, at 9; GruskinS., “Is There a Government in the Cockpit: A Passenger's Perspective, or Global Public Health: The Role of Human Rights,”Temple Law Review77, no. 2 (2004): 313–33, at 314.
7.
See Mann, supra note 5.
8.
FidlerD. P., “A Globalized Theory of Public Health,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics30, no. 2 (2002): 150–61.
9.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, General Assembly Resolution 217A (III), U.N. Doc. A/810, Preamble (1948), adopted December 10, 1948 [hereinafter cited as UDHR].
10.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, General Assembly Resolution 2200A (XXI), 21 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 52, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 999 U.N.T.S. 171, entered into force Mar. 23, 1976 [hereinafter cited as ICCPR].
11.
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Assembly Resolution 2200A (XXI), 21 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 59, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 999 U.N.T.S. 302, entered into force March 23, 1976 [hereinafter cited as ICESCR].
12.
Id., at art. 3–28.
13.
HannumH., “The Status and Future of the Customary International Law of Human Rights: The Status of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in National and International Law,”Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law25, no. 2 (1995): 287–398.
14.
See ICCPR, supra note 10.
15.
See ICESCR, supra note 11.
16.
Id., at art. 12.
17.
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, 660 U.N.T.S. 195, entered into force January 4, 1969 [hereinafter cited as CERD].
18.
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, General Assembly Resolution 34/180, 34 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 46) at 193, U.N. Doc. A/34/46, entered into force September 3, 1981 [hereinafter cited as CEDAW].
19.
Convention on the Rights of the Child, General Assembly Resolution 44/25, annex, 44 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 49) at 167, U.N. Doc. A/44/49 (1989), entered into force September 2, 1990 [hereinafter cited as CRC].
20.
Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, General Assembly Resolution 39/46, annex, 39 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 51) at 197, U.N. Doc. A/39/51 (1984), entered into force June 26, 1987.
21.
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, General Assembly Resolution A/61/611 (2006) [hereinafter cited as CRPD].
22.
Declaration on the Rights of Mentally Retarded Persons, General Assembly Resolution 2856 (XXVI), 26 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 29) at 93, U.N. Doc. A/8429 (1971).
23.
Declaration on the Rights of Disabled Persons, General Assembly Resolution 3447 (XXX), 30 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 34) at 88, U.N. Doc. A/10034, (1975).
24.
General Comment 14, Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, 22nd Session, April 25-May 12, 2000.
25.
See LundquistB., Monitoring the Implementation of the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Person with Disabilities, Annex – Final Report of the Special Rapporteur of the Commission for Social Development on Monitoring and Implementation of the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities on His Second Mission, 1997–2000, U.N. Doc. E/CN.5/2000/3 (2000), paras. 111–16, 152. See also, Report of the Special Rapporteur of the Commission for Social Development on Monitoring and Implementation of the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities on His Third Mandate, 2000–2002, U.N. Doc. E/CN.5/2002/4, paras. 29–37, 84–90.
26.
Commission on Human Rights resolution, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/RES/2002/31, adopted April 22, 2002; Economic and Social Council Resolution, U.N. Doc. E/DEC/2002/259, adopted July 25, 2002.
27.
See HuntP., Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health, Commission on Human Rights, 4th Sess., U.N. Doc. A/HRC/4/28 (2007). See also, HuntP., Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health, General Assembly, Commission on Human Rights, 61st Sess., U.N. Doc. A/61/338; HuntP., Report of Paul Hunt, Special Rapporteur on the Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health, Commission on Human Rights, 61st Sess., U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/2005/51.
28.
Individuals can submit claims under Optional Protocols to the ICCPR and CEDAW. Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, General Assembly Resolution, 2200A (XXI), 21 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 59, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 999 U.N.T.S. 302, entered into force March 23, 1976; Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, General Assembly Resolution 54/4, annex, 54 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 49) at 5, U.N. Doc. A/54/49 (Vol. I) (2000), entered into force December 22, 2000.
29.
See Fidler, supra note 8.
30.
European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, (ETS 5), 213 U.N.T.S. 222, entered into force September 3, 1953, as amended by Protocols Nos. 3, 5, and 8, which entered into force September 21, 1970, December 20, 1971, and January 1, 1990, respectively [hereinafter cited as ECHR]; Inter-American Convention on Human Rights, O.A.S. Treaty Series No. 36, 1144 U.N.T.S. 123, entered into force July 18, 1978, reprinted in Basic Documents Pertaining to Human Rights in the Inter-American System, OEA/Ser. L.V/II.82 doc.6 rev.1 at 25,1992 [hereinafter cited as IACHR].
31.
See ICCPR, supra note 10, at arts. 28–45 and Optional Protocol, at arts. 1–6; CEDAW, supra note 18, at arts. 17–22 and Optional Protocol, arts. 1–14; CRC, supra note 19, at arts. 43–45; CERD, supra note 17, at arts. 8–15; CRPD, supra note 21, at arts. 34–39 and Optional Protocol, arts. 1–9.
32.
GostinL. O.GableL., “The Human Rights of Persons with Mental Disabilities: A Global Perspective on the Application of Human Rights Principles to Mental Health,”Maryland Law Review63, no. 1 (2004): 20–121.
33.
GableL., “Mental Health and Due Process in the Americas: Protecting the Human Rights of Persons Involuntarily Admitted to and Detained in Psychiatric Institutions,”Pan American Journal of Public Health18, no. 4/5 (2005): 366–73.
34.
Victor Rosario Congo v. Ecuador, Case 11.247 (Inter-American CHR 63/99, 1999).
35.
U.S. Constitution, amends. 5, 6, and 7.
36.
U.S. Constitution, amends. 1 and 4.
37.
U.S. Constitution, amend. 14.
38.
Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil, at arts. 6, 205–14 (1988); Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, at art. 29 (1996).
39.
Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil, at arts. 6, 196–200 (1988); Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, at art. 27 (1996).
40.
KanterA., “The Globalization of Disability Rights Law,”Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce30, no. 2 (2003): 241–70, at 241.
41.
42 USCS § 12101 (2007).
42.
BagenstosS. R., “The Future of Disability Law,”Yale Law Journal114, no. 1 (2004): 1–84.
43.
Id.
44.
HoffmanS., “Settling the Matter: Does Title I of the ADA Work?”Alabama Law Review, forthcoming, available at <http://ssrn.com/abstract=978198> (last visited September 10, 2007).
45.
DegenerT.QuinnG., “A Survey of International, Comparative and Regional Disability Law Reform,” in BreslinM. L.YeeS., eds., Disability Rights Law and Policy: International and National Perspectives (New York: Transnational Publishers, 2002): At 3–128; see Kanter, supra note 40.
46.
Human Rights Act, 1998, c. 42.
47.
BindmanJ., “The Human Rights Act and Mental Health Legislation,”British Journal of Psychiatry182, no. 2 (2003): 91–94.
48.
Minister of Health v. Treatment Action Committee, Constitutional Court of South Africa, 2002 (10) BCLR 1033 (CC) (S.Afr.); FormanL., “The Imperative to Treat: The South African State's Constitutional Obligations to Provide Antiretroviral Medicines,”Health Law Review12, no. 1 (2002): 9–15.
49.
AlvarezJ. E., International Organizations as Law-Makers (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005): at 650.
50.
Report of the Secretary-General, In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All, U.N. Doc. A/59/2005 (2005), at 37.
51.
World Health Organization, 25 Questions and Answers on Human Rights, Geneva, 2002.
World Health Organization, Engaging for Health: The 11th Global Programme of Work, 2006–2015: A Global Health Agenda, Geneva, 2006.
54.
World Health Organization, WHO Resource Book on Mental Health, Human Rights, and Legislation, Geneva, 2005.
55.
World Health Assembly, International Health Regulations, Geneva, 2005, entered into force June 15, 2007, available at <http://www.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA58/WHA58_3en.pdf> <last visited September 10, 2007) [hereinafter cited as IHR].
56.
Id., at art. 6.
57.
Id., at arts. 3, 32.
58.
GostinL. O., “International Infectious Disease Law: Revision of the World Health Organization's International Health Regulations,”JAMA291, no. 21 (2004): 2623–27.
59.
UNAIDS, International Guidelines on HIV/AIDS and Human Rights, Geneva, 2006; UNAIDS, Handbook for Legislators on HIV/AIDS, Law, and Human Rights, Geneva, 1999; UNDP, Supporting National HIV/AIDS Responses, Geneva, 2004; UNDP, Human Development Report 200: Human Rights and Human Development (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).
60.
Pan American Health Organization, The Right to Health in the Americas, Washington, D.C., 1989.
See, e.g., Pan American Health Organization, Understanding and Responding to HIV/AIDS-related Stigma and Stigma and Discrimination in the Health Sector, Washington D.C., 2003.
63.
FidlerD. P., SARS, Governance, and the Globalization of Disease (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004): At 21–22.
64.
Id.
65.
Physicians for Human Rights, Epidemic of Inequality: Women's Rights and HIV/AIDS in Botswana and Swaziland, Cambridge, MA, 2007.
66.
Human Rights Watch, Rhetoric and Risk: Human Rights Abuses Impeding Ukraine's Fight against HIV/AIDS, March 2006; Human Rights Watch, Locked Doors: The Human Rights of People Living with HIV/AIDS in China, August 2003.
67.
Mental Disability Rights International, Human Rights and Mental Health in Peru, 2004, and Human Rights and Mental Health: Uruguay, 2004.
68.
Mental Disability Rights International, Not on the Agenda: Human Rights of People with Mental Disabilities in Kosovo, 2002, and Human Rights and Mental Health: Hungary, 1997.
69.
HillmanA., “Protecting Mental Disability Rights: A Success Story in the Inter-American Human Rights System,”Human Rights Briefs12, no. 3 (2005): 25–28.
70.
WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, entered into force February 27, 2005.
71.
See CRPD, supra note 21.
72.
DhirA. A., “Human Rights Treaty Drafting through the Lens of Mental Disability: The Proposed International Convention on Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities,”Stanford Journal of International Law41, no. 2 (2005): 181–216.
73.
See Fidler, supra note 8.
74.
See CRPD, supra note 21.
75.
Id., at arts. 1, 4(1).
76.
Id., at art. 34.
77.
Id., at art. 35.
78.
Id., at art. 31.
79.
Id., at art. 4(3).
80.
Optional Protocol to the International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
81.
See CRPD, supra note 21, at art. 1.
82.
Id., at arts. 5, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14.
83.
Id., at arts. 15, 16, 21.
84.
Id., at arts. 18–20, 22, 23.
85.
Id., at arts. 24–30.
86.
GoodmanR.JinksD., “How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law,”Duke Law Journal74, no. 3 (2004): 621–703.
87.
JonesM., “Can International Law Improve Mental Health? Some Thoughts on the Proposed Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities,”International Journal of Law and Psychiatry28, no. 2 (2005): 183–205.
88.
MelishT. J., “The U.N. Disability Convention: Historic Process, Strong Prospects, and Why the U.S. Should Ratify,”Human Rights Brief14, no. 2 (2007): 37–46.
89.
See Dhir, supra note 72; JustesenT. R.JustesenT. R., “An Analysis of the Development and Adoption of the United Nations Convention Recognizing the Rights of Individuals with Disabilities: Why the United States Refuses to Sign This U.N. Convention,”Human Rights Brief14, no. 2 (2007): 36–41.
90.
SteinM. A., “Disability Human Rights,”California Law Review95, no. 1 (2007): 75–121.
91.
See Burris, supra note 3; HunterN. D., “‘Public-Private’ Health Law: Multiple Directions in Public Health,”Journal of Health Care Law & Policy10, no. 1 (2007): 101–132; LobelO., “The Renew Deal: The Fall of Regulation and the Rise of Governance in Contemporary Legal Thought,”Minnesota Law Review89, no. 2 (2004): 342–470; TrubekL. G., “New Governance and Soft Law in Health Care Reform,”Indiana Health Law Review3, no. 1 (2006): 137–170.