NoahL., “Informed Consent and the Elusive Dichotomy Between Standard and Experimental Therapy,”American Journal of Law & Medicine28 (2002): 361–2
2.
Id.
3.
ErbT.SchulmanS., and SugarmanJ., “Permission and Assent for Clinical Research in Pediatric Anesthesia,”Anesthesia and Analgesia94, no. 5 (2002): 1155–60.
4.
Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-109, 115 Stat. 1408 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 21 U.S.C. and 42 U.S.C) (increasing clinical testing on pediatric populations); Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003, Pub. L No. 108-155, 117 Stat. 1936; (requiring research into pediatric uses for new drugs and biological products); AchenbachT. M.HowellC. T.QuayH. C., and ConnersK. C., “National Survey of Problems and Competencies Among Four to Sixteen-Year-Olds: Parents' Reports for Normative and Clinical Samples,”Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development56, no. 3 (1991): 1–131; The Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA), Pub. L. No. 105-115, §111, 111 Stat. 2296, 2305-2309, which amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 (FFDCA), as amended, 21 U.S.C. 301, et seq. (2004) (The FDAMA codifies FDA's regulations to increase patient access to experimental drugs and medical devices, accelerate review of important new medications, and promote pediatric clinical testing); AldermanE. M.RiederJ., and CohenM. I., “A History of Pediatric Specialties: The History of Adolescent Medicine,”Pediatric Research54, no. 1 (2003): 137–147; BreitmayerB. J.GalloA. M.KnaflK. A., and ZoellerL. H., “Social Competence of School-Aged Children With Chronic Illnesses,”Journal of Pediatric Nursing7, no. 3 (1992): 181–188; DornL. D.SusmanE. J., and FletcherJ. C., “Informed Consent in Children and Adolescents: Age, Maturation and Psychological State,”Journal of Adolescent Health16 (1995): 185–190; EnglishA., “Treating Adolescents: Legal and Ethical Considerations,”Adolescent Medicine74, no. 5 (1990): 1097–1112; GaylinW., “The ‘Competence’ of Children No Longer All or None,”Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry21 (1982): 153–162; GrissoT.AppelbaumT., and AppelbaumP. S., Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: A Guide for Physicians and Other Health Professionals (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998): 17–34; HurleyJ. C. and UnderwoodM. K., “Children's Understanding of their Research Rights before and after Debriefing: Informed Assent, Confidentiality, and Stopping Participation,”Child Development73, no. 1 (2002): 132–143; KingN. P., and CrossA. W., “Children as Decision Makers: Guidelines for Pediatricians,”The Journal of Pediatrics115, no. 1 (1989): 10–16; KoocherG. P., and DeMasoD. R., “Children's Competence to Consent to Medical Procedures,”Pediatrician17 (1990): 68–73; KorenG.CarmeliD. B.CarmeliY. S., and HaslamR., “Maturity of Children to Consent to Medical Research: The Babysitter Test,”Journal of Medical Ethics19 (1993): 142–147; LarcherV., “ABC of Adolescent Consent, Competence and Confidentiality,”British Medical Journal330, no. 7487 (2005): 353–356; LewisC. C., “How Adolescents Approach Decisions: Changes over Grades Seven to Twelve and Policy Implications,”Child Development52 (1981): 538–544; LewisM. A. and LewisC. E., “Consequences of Empowering Children to Care for themselves,”Pediatrician17 (1990): 63–67; MorrisseyJ. M.HofmannA. D., and ThropeJ. C., Consent and Confidentiality in the Health Care of Children and Adolescents: A Legal Guide (New York: Free Press, 1986): 87–93; OlechnowiczJ. Q.EderM.SimonC.ZyzanskiS., and KodishE., “Assent Observed: Children's Involvement in Leukemia Treatment and Research Discussions,”Pediatrics109, no. 5 (2002): 806–14; OndrusekN.AbramovitchR.PencharzP.KorenG., “Empirical Examination of the Ability of Children to Consent to Clinical Research,”Journal of Medical Ethics24 (1998): 158–165; PetersonA. C., and LeffertN., “Developmental Issues Influencing Guidelines for Adolescent Health Research: A Review,”Journal of Adolescent Health17, no. 5 (1995): 298–305; RothL. H.MeiselA., and LidzC. W., “Tests of Competency to Consent to Treatment,”American Journal of Psychiatry134, no. 3 (1977): 279–84; SigmanG. S. and O'ConnorC., “Exploration for Physicians of the Mature Minor Doctrine,”The Journal of Pediatrics119, no. 4 (1991): 520–25; TsaiA. K.SchafermeyerR. W.KalifonD.BarkinR. B.LumpkinJ. R.SmithE. E.III, “Evaluation and Treatment of Minors: Reference on Consent,”Annals of Emergency Medicine22, no. 7 (1993): 1211–1217; WalkerL. J., “Cognitive and Perspective-taking Prerequisites for Moral Development,”Child Development51 (1980): 131–39; WeithornL. A., “Children's Capacities to Decide about Participation in Research,”IRB5, no. 2 (1983): 1–5; WeithornL. A. and CampbellS. B., “The Competency of Children and Adolescents to Make Informed Treatment Decisions,”Child Development53 (1982): 1589–1598; ZinnerS. E., “The Elusive Goal of Informed Consent by Adolescents,”Theoretical Medicine16 (1995): 323–31.
5.
OesterheldJ. M.FogasB. P., and RuttenS. M., “Ethical Standards for Research on Children,”Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry37, no. 7 (1998): 684–685; PorterJ., “Regulatory Considerations when Children are Involved as Subjects in Research,”Journal of School Health55 (1985): 175–178; RamseyP., “Ethical Dimensions of Experimental Research on Children,” in van EysJ., ed., Research on Children: Medical Imperatives, Ethical Quandaries, and Legal Constraints (Baltimore: University Press, 1978): 57–68; RedmonR., “How Children Can be Respected as ‘Ends’ Yet Still be Used as Subjects in Non-Therapeutic Research,”Journal of Medical Ethics12 (1986) 77–82; RogersA. S., and the Committee on Research Ethics, “The Society for Adolescent Medicine's Code of Research Ethics – Commentary,”Journal of Adolescent Health24 (1999): 283; SantelliJ., “Human Subjects Protection and Parental Permission in Adolescent Health Research,”Journal of Adolescent Health21, no. 6 (1997): 384–87; SilberT. J., “Justified Paternalism in Adolescent Health Care: Cases of Anorexia Nervosa and Substance Abuse,”Journal of Adolescent Health Care10, no. 6 (1989): 449–53; SteinbrookR., “Testing Medications in Children,”N. Engl. J. Med.347, no. 18 (2002): 1462–70; StrasburgerV. C., “Parental Permission in Adolescent Health Research,”Journal of Adolescent Health22 (1998): 322; TarnowskiK. J.AllenD. M.MayhallC., and KellyP. A., “Readability of Pediatric Biomedical Research Informed Consent Forms,”Pediatrics85, no. 1 (1990): 58–62; The American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors and The American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors, “ASHG/ACMG REPORT Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents,”American Journal of Human Genetics57 (1995): 1233–41; ThompsonP., “Protection of the Rights of Children as Subjects for Research,”Journal of Pediatric Nursing2, no. 6 (1987): 392–99; ThurberF. W.DeatrickJ. A., and GreyM., “Children's Participation in Research: Their Right to Consent,”Journal of Pediatric Nursing7, no. 3 (1992): 165–170; VauxK., “Lazarus Revisited: Moral and Spiritual Aspects of Experimental Therapeutics with Children,” in van EysJ. ed., Research on Children: Medical Imperatives, Ethical Quandaries, and Legal Constraints (Baltimore: University Press, 1978): 77–84; WendlerD., and ShaahS., “Should Children Decide whether they Are Enrolled in Non-Beneficial Research?”The American Journal of Bioethics2, no. 4 (2003): 1–7; WertzD. J.FanosJ. H., and ReillyP. R., “Genetic Testing for Children and Adolescents,”JAMA272, no. 11 (1994): 875–81; ZipurskyA., “Ethics and Responsibilities in Pediatric Research: Editor's Commentary,”Pediatric Research46, no. 4 (1999): 357; Protection of Human Subjects in Research; Uniform National Applicability of Common Rule and Provisions Protecting Vulnerable Populations, in Code 42, Section 491, H. R. 4697, May 9, 2002; Protection of Human Subjects: Policies and Procedures, Part II, in Code 38, Section 221. November 16, 1973; The Public Health And Welfare Chapter 6A – Public Health Service Subchapter II – General Powers and Duties Part A – Research and Investigations, in Code 42, Section 241, January 5, 1995; 45 C.F.R. § 46.109 (2003); 21 C.F.R. Parts 50 and 56: 66 (2004); AnnasG. J., The Rights of Patients: The Basic ACLU Guide to Patient Rights, second ed. (Totowa: Humana Press1992): 83–100; AnnasG. J.GlantzL. H., and KatzB. F., Informed Consent to Human Experimentation: The Subject's Dilemma (Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1977): 62–96; BergJ.AppelbaumP.LidzC., and ParkerL., Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice, Second Ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001): 249–279; BernatJ., “Informed Consent,”Muscle and Nerve (2001): 614–620; National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants, 2001; Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Participants, Institute of Medicine, FedermanD. D.HannaK. E., and RodriguezL. L., eds., Responsible Research: A Systems Approach to Protecting Research Participants (Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2002); WeisstubD. N.Verdun-JonesS. N., and WalkerJ., “Biomedical Experimentation with Children: Balancing the Need for Protective Measures with the Need to Respect Children's Developing Ability to Make Significant Life Decisions for themselves,” in WeisstubD. N., Research on Human Subjects: Ethics, Law and Social Policy (Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd., 1998): 405–432; EarleyC. L.StrongL. C., “Certificates of Confidentiality: A Valuable Tool for Protecting Genetic Data,”American Journal of Human Genetics57 (1995): 727–731; ElgerB. S., “Beneficence Today, or Autonomy (Maybe) Tomorrow?”Hastings Center Report30, no. 1 (2000): 18–19; EmanuelE. J.WendlerD., and GradyC., “What Makes Clinical Research Ethical?”JAMA283, no. 20 (2000): 2701–2711; FadenR. R.BeauchampT. L., and KingN. M., A History and Theory of Informed Consent (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986): 151–186; FloryJ. and EmanuelE., “Interventions to Improve Research Participants' Understanding in Informed Consent for Research: A Systematic Review,”JAMA292, no. 13 (2004): 1593–1618; HillerE. H.LandenburgerG., and NatowiczM. R., “Public Participation in Medical Policy-Making and the Status of Consumer Autonomy: The Example of Newborn-Screening Programs in the United States,”American Journal of Public Health87, no. 8 (1997): 1280–1288; HopeT., “Compensating Subjects of Medical Research,”Journal of Medical Ethics23 (1997): 131–132; NelsonR. M., “Children as Research Subjects,” in KahnJ. P.MastroianniA. C., and SugarmanJ., Beyond Consent: Seeking Justice in Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998): 47–66; LevineR. J., Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research, Second Ed. (Baltimore: Urban and Schwarzenberg, 1986): 19–35, 235–256; MunsonR., Intervention and Reflection: Basic Issues in Medical Ethics, sixth ed. (Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, 2000): 476–480; National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, Pub. No (OS) 78–0012, 1978.
6.
BroomeM. E. and StieglitzK. A., “The Consent Process and Children,”Research in Nursing and Health15 (1992): 147–152; BrockD. W., “Ethical Issues in Exposing Children to Risks in Research,” in GrodinM. A., and GlantzL. H., eds., Children as Research Subjects: Science, Ethics and Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994): 81–101; GlantzL. H., “The Law of Human Experimentation with Children,” in GrodinM. A. and GlantzL. H., eds., Children as Research Subjects: Science, Ethics and Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994): 103–130.
7.
Id.;AldersonP., “In the Genes or in the Stars? Children's Competence to Consent,”Journal of Medical Ethics18 (1992): 119–124.
8.
See AchenbachBreitmayerDornEnglishGaylinGrissoKoocherKorenLarcherLewisMorrisseyOlechnowiczOndrusekPetersonRothSigmanTsaiWalkerWeithornZinner, supra note 4; See Alderson, supra note 7; DamonW., and HartD., “The Development of Self-Understanding from Infancy through Adolescence,”Child Development53 (1982): 841–864; DornL. D.SusmanE. J., and FletcherJ. C., “Informed Consent in Children and Adolescents: Age, Maturation and Psychological State,”Journal of Adolescent Health16 (1995): 185–90; HazardS. W., “An Alternative Model Act Providing for Consent of Minors for Health Services,”Pediatrics52, no. 5 (1973): 750–52; HolderA. R., “Involuntary Commitment, Incompetency and Consent,”Institutional Review Board5, no. 2 (1983): 6–8; HolderA. R., “Minor's Rights to Consent to Medical Care,”JAMA257, no. 24 (1987): 3400–3401; MorrisW. C., “Waiver of Prospective Consent for Pediatric Resuscitation Research: In Reply,”Pediatrics115 (2005): 829–830; NewburgerP. E.ElfenbeinD. S., and BoxerL. A., “Adolescents with Cancer: Access to Clinical Trials and Age-Appropriate Care,”Current Opinion in Pediatrics14 (2002): 1–4; NottelmannE. D.SusmanE. J.Inoff-GermainG.CutlerG. B.Jr.LoriauxD. L., and ChrousosG. P., “Developmental Processes in Early Adolescence: Relationships Between Adolescent Adjustment Problems and Chronologic Age, Pubertal Stage, and Puberty-Related Serum Hormone Levels,”The Journal of Pediatrics110 (1987): 473–80; RitchieM. A., “Psychosocial Functioning of Adolescents with Cancer: A Developmental Perspective,”Oncology Nursing Forum19, no. 10 (1992):1497–1501; SteinbergL., and SilverbergS., “The Vicissitudes of Autonomy in Early Adolescence,”Child Development57 (1986): 841–51; ThompsonR. A., “Vulnerability in Research: A Developmental Perspective on Research Risk,”Child Development61 (1990): 1–16; WeinbergerD. A.TubinS. K.FordM. E., and FeldmanS. S., “Preadolescents' Social-Emotional Adjustment and Selective Attrition in Family Research,”Child Development61 (1990): 1374–86.
9.
Some studies in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, polycystic kidney disease and some genetic hematological disorders span not just years, but generations.
10.
SwallenK. C.ReitherE. N.HaasS. A., and MeierA. M., “Overweight, Obesity, and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Adolescents: The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health,”Pediatrics115, no. 2 (2005): 340–347.
11.
Akers, “Should Children be Used as Research Subjects?”Nursing Forum3 (1994): 28–22.
12.
See NBAC and Belmont Report, supra note 5; ShalalaD., “Protecting Research Subjects – What Must Be Done,”Sounding Board, N. Engl. J. Med.343, no. 11 (2000): 808–810; GoldnerJ., “An Overview of Legal Controls on Human Experimentation and the Regulatory Implications of Taking Professor Katz Seriously,”St. Louis University Law Journal38, no. 1 (1993): 63–134; National Research Act of 1974, Pub. L. No 93–348, § 88 Stat. 342, (1974).
13.
45 C.F.R. 46 Subpart A (2003).
14.
Coleman, “Rationalizing Risk Assessment in Human Subject Research,”Arizona Law Review46, no. 1 (2004): 63–134.
15.
45 C.F.R Subpart D (2004); ArnoldE. and CookE., “Ethical Issues in Biological Psychiatric Research with Children and Adolescents,”Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry34, no.7 (1995): 929–39.
16.
United States Congress, Children's Health Act 2000, Pub. L 106–310 (106th Congress. 2d Session).
17.
MenikoffJ., “Full Disclosure: Telling Patients When Not Being a Research Subject is a Good Choice,”Perspectives in Biology and Medicine48, no. 1 (2005): S 139.
18.
See Noah, supra note 1.
19.
Faculty of Yale University School of Medicine, ZaretB.JatlawP., and KatzL., eds., The Patients' Guide to Medical Tests (New York: Houghton Miflin Company, 2002): 9–14.
20.
Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Bioethics, “Informed Consent, Parental Permission, and Assent in Pediatric Practice,”Pediatrics95, no. 2 (1995): 314–317.
21.
Id.
22.
Id.
23.
See Larcher, supra note 4.
24.
See Porter, supra note 5; BroomeM. E., and StieglitzK. A., “The Consent Process is Children,”Research in Nursing and Health15 (1992): 147–52.
25.
AkersJ., and BellS., “Should Children be Used as Research Subjects,”Nursing Forum29, no. 3 (1994): 28–33.
26.
See Committee on Bioethics, supra note 20.
27.
Id.
28.
See King, supra note 4.
29.
See Committee on Bioethics, supra note 20.
30.
CampisL.LymanR., and Prentice-DunnS., “The Parental Locus of Control Scale: Development and Validation,”Journal of Clinical Child Psychology15, no. 3 (1986): 260–267; LovejoyM., “Convergent and Discriminate Validity of Measures of Parenting Efficacy and Control,”Journal of Clinical Child Psychology26, no. 4 (1997): 366–76.
31.
See EnglishDornGaylinKorenLarcherMorrisseySigmanWeithornZinner, supra note 4; See RogersSantelliStrasburger, ASHG/ACMG, supra note 5; DornKingNewburger, supra note 8; Arnold, supra note 16; American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors, and the American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors, “Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychological Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents,”American Journal of Human Genetics57 (1995): 1233–1241; HolderA. R., Legal Issues in Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985): 146–175; LeikinS. L., “An Ethical Issue in Biomedical Research: The Involvement of Minors in Informed and Third Party Consent,”Clinical Research294, no. 6575 (1983): Supplement 28–30; LevineR. J., “Adolescents as Research Subjects Without Permission of Their Parents or Guardians: Ethical Considerations,”Journal of Adolescent Health17 (1995): 287–97; Society for Adolescent Medicine, “Guidelines for Adolescent Health Research: A Position Paper,”Journal of Adolescent Health22 (2003): 396–409; MunirK., and EarlsF., “Ethical Principles Governing Research in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,”Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry31, no. 3 (1992): 408–414; Committee on Youth, American Academy of Pediatrics, “The Implications of Minor's Consent Legislation for Adolescent Health Care: A Commentary,”Pediatrics54, no. 4 (1974): 481–485.
32.
A PubMed search on March 24, 2005 for the terms “informed consent” and “pediatric assent” yielded 28,743 and 37 references, respectively.
33.
A PubMed search run on March 24, 2005 for the terms “research informed consent” and “research pediatric assent” yielded 10,532 and 29 references, respectively.
34.
45 C.F.R.46 Subpart D (2004).
35.
Id.
36.
NaliniJ.UlrichC. M., and LeyC., “Ethical Considerations in the Recruitment of Research Subjects from Hospitalized, Cardiovascular Patient Populations,”Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing20, no.1 (2005): 56.
37.
See Wendler, supra note 5.
38.
45 C.F.R. 46.116 (2004).
39.
See Broome, supra note 6.
40.
See DornEnglishGaylinKingKoocherLarcherLewisC.LewisM.MorrisseyOndrusekPetersonRothWeithornZinner, supra note 4; See ThurberWendler, supra note 5; See Committee on Bioethics, supra note 21; See Broome, supra note 27; See Hold, Committee on Youth, supra note 31; Pediatric Practice Action Group and Task Force on Medical Informatics, American Academy of Pediatrics, “Privacy Protection of Health Information: Patient Rights and Pediatrician Responsibilities” (RE9927) Pediatrics104, no. 4 (1999): 973–77; BartholomeW. G., “Informed Consent, Parental Permission, and Assent in Pediatric Practice,”Pediatrics96, no. 5, part 1 (1995): 981–82; BartholomeW. G., “Central Themes in the Debate over Involvement of Infants and Children in Biomedical Research: A Critical Examination, in Research on Children,” in van EysJ., ed., Research on Children: Medical Imperatives, Ethical Quandaries, and Legal Constraints (Baltimore: University Press, 1978): 69–76; BartholomeW. G., “A New Understanding of Consent in Pediatric Practice: Consent, Parental Permission, and Child Assent,”Pediatric Annals18, no. 4 (1989): 262–265; MammelK. and KaplanD., “Research Consent by Adolescent Minors and Institiutional Review Boards,”Journal of Adolescent Health17 (1995): 323–330; Society of Adolescent Medicine, “Position Paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine,”Journal of Adolescent Health24 (1999): 277–282; Midwest Bioethics Center Task Force on Health Care Rights for Minors, “Health Care Treatment Decision-Making Guidelines for Minors,”Bioethics Forum11, no. 4 (1995): A1–A16; NelsonR. M., “Children as Research Subjects,” in KahnJ. P.MastroianniA. C., and SugarmanJ., eds., Beyond Consent: Seeking Justice in Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998): 47–66; VaughanV. C.III, and LittI. F., Child and Adolescent Development: Clinical Implications (Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 1990): 255–260, 272–274, 297–306.
41.
See Erb, supra note 3; Committee on Bioethics, supra note 20; see CampisLovejoy, supra note 30.
42.
Kuhns v. Bruger, 390 Pa. 331, 401 135 A.2d 395 (1957). Page 401 discusses the concept that minors over the age of fourteen are presumptively capable of negligence and must prove their own incapacity; Dunn v. Teti, 280 Pa. Super. 399, 21 A.2d 782 (1980); 132. United States v. Rosa, 17 F.3d 1531 (2d Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 879 (1994).
43.
See GaylinWeithorn, supra note 4.
44.
See DornEnglishGrissoKingKoocherKorenLarcherLewisC.LewisM.OlechnowiczOndrusekPetersonRothWeithornZinner, supra note 4; see ThurberWendler, supra note 5; see Committee on Bioethics, supra note 20; see Broome, supra note 27; see Holder, Society or Adolescent Medicine, Committee on Youth, supra note 31; see APP Pediatric Practice Action Group, Bartholeme, Mammel, Midwest Bioethics Center, Nelson, supra note 40.
45.
See Members of Yale Faculty, supra note 19.
46.
See Society of Adolescent Medicine, supra note 31.
47.
Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, in 428 US 52, 96 S Ct. 2831, 49 L Ed. 2d 788. 1976.
48.
Carey v. Population Services International, 431 U.S. 678, 684, 97 S.Ct. 2010, 2016, 52 L.Ed.2d 675 (1977). These pages discuss that the right to privacy includes an interest in independence in making certain kinds of important decisions including child-bearing decisions.
49.
Belloti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622, 640, 99 S.Ct. 3035, 3046, 61 L.Ed.2d 797 (1979). These pages reference the premises that the State furthers a constitutionally permissible end by encouraging an unmarried pregnant minor to seek the help and advice of her parents in making the very important decision of whether to have a child.
50.
See Society of Adolescent Medicine, supra note 31.