BieberF. R., “Science and Technology in Forensic DNA Profiling,” in LazerD., ed., DNA and the Criminal Justice System: The Technology of Justice (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004): 23–62.
2.
GrossS. R., “Exonerations in the United States, 1989 through 2003,”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology95 (2005): 523–560.
3.
BieseckerL. G.Bailey-WilsonJ. E.BallantyneJ.BaumH.BieberF. R., “DNA Identifications from the 9/11 World Trade Center Attack,”Science310 (2005): 1122–1123.
4.
BudowleB.BieberF. R.EisenbergA., “Forensic Aspects of Mass Disasters: Strategic Considerations for DNA-Based Human Identification,”Legal Medicine (Tokyo)7, no. 4 (2005): 230–243.
WilliamsR.JohnsonP., and MartinP., “Genetic Information & Crime Investigation: Social, Ethical and Public Policy Aspects of the Establishment, Expansion and Police Use of the National DNA Database,”School of Applied Sciences, University of Durham web site, 2004, available at <http://www.dur.ac.uk/p.j.johnson> (last visited February 28, 2006); WilliamsR. and JohnsonP., “Forensic DNA Databasing: A European Perspective, Interim Report,”School of Applied Sciences, University of Durham web site, June 2005, at <http://www.dur.ac.uk/p.j.johnson> (last visited February 28, 2006).
7.
GillP.FeredayL.NorlingN.SchneiderP. M., “The Evolution of DNA Databases – Recommendations for New European STR Loci,”Forensic Science International156 (2006): 242–244.
See AxelradS., Survey of DNA Database Statutes (as of July, 2005), at <www.aslme.org>.
11.
See AxelradS., supra note 10; following the U.K. lead, in the U.S. there has been steady growth in the size of convicted offender DNA databases (e.g., an approximately five-fold increase in the past four years) due in large part to an expansion of the statutory criteria for inclusion. In the U.S., forty-three states have amended their criminal codes to provide for DNA collections from all felons and six states (CA, LA, TX, and VA) now include arrestees as well. Currently there are almost three million DNA profiles and samples in the U.S. offender/arrestee databank.
12.
Codified at 42 U.S.C. &14135a (2005). President George W. Bush, on January 5, 2006, signed into law the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005 (H.R. 3402). Public Law Number 109–162 (See Table 1 for summary of DNA provisions).
Various jurisdictions report “cold hit” rates – the percentage of crime scene DNA profiles that connect to a catalogued offender in the database – of from ten percent to as much as sixty percent. The variation depends on the rules for database inclusion, the maturity of the database, and on how the statistics are defined.
GilmerJ. A.van AlstyneD. J.“The First 100 Hits – Forensic-Offender Matches on the New York State DNA Data Bank,”NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services, January 2002, at <http://criminaljustice.state.ny.us/crimnet/ojsa/100_hits/> (last visited February 28, 2006).
DNA is left at the majority of sexual assaults, but the extent to which it is available at other types of crime is quite variable. This alone can preclude use of DNA testing.
SchlesingerL. B., Serial Offenders (New York: CRC Press, 2001); FarringtonD., “The Development of Offending and Antisocial Behavior from Childhood: Key Findings from the Cambridge Study of Delinquent Development,”Journal of Childhood Psychology and Psychiatry36 (1995): 929–964; PutkonenenA.RyynanenO. P.EronenM., and TiihonenJ., “The Quantitative Risk of Violent Crime And Criminal Offending: A Case-Control Study among the Offspring of Recidivistic Finnish Homicide Offenders,”Acta Psychiatr Scand106 (Suppl 412) (2002): 54–57; SmithC. and FarringtonD., “Continuities in Antisocial Behavior and Parenting Across Three Generations,”Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry45, no. 2 (2004): 230–247; FarringtonD.BarnesD. P., and LambertS., “The Concentration of Offenders in Families,”Legal and Criminological Psychology1 (1996): 47–63; 17.1% of jail inmates surveyed reported a father, 4.4% a mother, 30.3% a brother, 6.2% a sister, 3.3% a spouse, and 1.3% a child having been, at some point, in a correctional facility, BeckA.GilliardD.GreenfeldL.HarlowC.HesterT.JankowskiL.SnellT.StephanJ.MortonD., Survey of State Prison Inmates, Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Dept. Justice, Correctional Populations in the United States, 1996, at 62, Table 4.18.
34.
McClearyR., Dangerous Men: The Sociology of Parole (Albany, NY: Harrow and Heston, 1992).
35.
See supra note 18; LazerD.MeyerM., DNA and the Criminal Justice System: Consensus and Debate, in LazerD., ed., DNA and the Criminal Justice System: The Technology of Justice (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004): 357–390; KayeD. H.SmithM. S., “DNA Databases for Law Enforcement: The Coverage Question and the Case for a Population-Wide Database,” in DNA and the Criminal Justice System: The Technology of Justice, LazerD., ed., (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004): 247–284; WilliamsR.JohnsonP., “Inclusiveness, Effectiveness and Intrusiveness: Issues in the Developing Uses of DNA Profiling in Support of Criminal Investigations,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics33 (2005): 545–550. Reprinted in this issue, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics35 (2006): 234–247.