De AngelisC.DrazenJ. M.FrizelleF. A., “Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors,”N. Engl. J. Med.254 (2004): 1250–1.
2.
Ibid.
3.
Ibid.
4.
In a RCT, subjects are randomly allocated to either the treatment group, or the control group; the control group receives a placebo in lieu of the actual intervention. RCTs may be open (i.e., both the researcher and patient know which group the patient is in), single-blind (the researcher knows but the patient does not), or double-blind (neither party is aware).
5.
LillenfeldA. M., “Ceteris Parabus: The Evolution of the Clinical Trial,”Bulletin of the History of Medicine56 (1982): 1–18.
GradyD.HerringtonD., V. Bittner, et al., for the HERS Research Group, “Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes during 6.8 years of Hormone Therapy,”JAMA288 (2002): 49–57; HulleyS.FurbergC.Barrett-ConnorE.“Non-cardiovascular Disease Outcomes during 6.8 years of Hormone Therapy: Health and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study Follow-up (HERS II),”JAMA288 (2002): 58–66; Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators, “Risks and Benefits of Estrogen plus Progestin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women: Principal Results from the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial,”JAMA288 (2002): 321–333.
8.
ShojaniaK. G.DuncanB. W.McDonaldK. M.WachterR. M., “Safe but Sound: Patient Safety meets Evidence-based Medicine,”JAMA288 (2002): 508–13.
9.
SchererR. W.LangenbergP., full publication of results initially presented in abstracts [Cochrane Methodology Review] (Oxford, England: Cochrane Library, Update Software, 2003): Issue 1. See also DickersinRennie, supra note 6.
10.
HartlingL.CraigW. R.RussellK.StevensK.KlassenT. P., “Factors Influencing the Publication of Randomized Controlled Trials in Child Health Research,”Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine158 (2004): 983–7.
11.
ChalmersI., “Underreporting Research is Scientific Misconduct,”JAMA263 (1990): 1405–1408.
12.
See DickersinRennie, supra note 6.
13.
CallahamM. L.WearsR. L.WeberE. J.BartonC.YoungG., “Positive-outcome Bias and other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting,”JAMA280 (1998): 254–257; EloubeidiM. A.WadeS. B.ProvenzaleD., “Factors Associated with Acceptance and Full Publication of GI Endoscopic Research Originally Published in Abstract Form,”Gastrointestinal Endoscopy53 (2001): 275–282.
14.
SternJ. M.SimesR. J., “Publication Bias: Evidence of Delayed Publication in a Cohort Study of Clinical Research Projects,”British Medical Journal315 (1997): 640–645.
15.
DickersinK.ChanS.ChalmersT. C.SacksH. S.SmithH. J. R., “Publication Bias and Clinical Trials,”Controlled Clinical Trials8 (1987): 343–353.
16.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses compile the results of all clinical trials on a particular drug or other intervention, and reevaluate its effectiveness using a greater amount of data.
17.
Spitzer v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC, N.Y. Sup. Ct., No. 04/401707.
18.
Ibid.
19.
Ibid.
20.
Ibid.
21.
MartinezB., “Glaxo Settles New York Suit over Unpublished Clinical Data,”The Wall Street Journal, August 27, 2004, at B3.
22.
HuthE. J., “Irresponsible Authorship and Wasteful Publication,”Annals of Internal Medicine104 (1986): 257–59.
23.
HustonP.MoherD., “Redundancy, Disaggregation, and the Integrity of Medical Research,”Lancet347 (1996): 1024–26.
24.
See HustonMoher, supra note 23.
25.
Ibid.
26.
McCrayA., “Better Access to Information About Clinical Trials,”Annals of Internal Medicine133 (2000): 609–614.
27.
Section 113, Information Program on Clinical Trials for Serious or Life-Threatening Diseases, Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997, Public Law 105–115.
Phase I studies are designed to establish the effects of a new drug in humans. These studies are usually conducted on small populations of healthy humans to specifically determine a drug's toxicity, absorption, distribution and metabolism. After the successful completion of phase I trials, a drug is then tested for safety and efficacy in a slightly larger population of individuals who are afflicted with the disease or condition for which the drug was developed. This is known as a Phase II study. The third and last pre-approval round of testing of a drug is conducted on large populations of afflicted patients. Phase III studies usually test the new drug in comparison with the standard therapy currently being used for the disease in question. The results of these trials usually provide the information that is included in the package insert and labeling. After a drug has been approved by the FDA, Phase IV studies are conducted to compare the drug to a competitor, explore additional patient populations, or to further study any adverse events. (From <http://www.centerwatch.com/patient/glossary.html> [last visited August 23, 2005]).
CohenP., “Medical Journals to Require Clinical Trial Registration,”New Scientist, September 9, 2004available at <www.newsrientist.com/news/printjsp?id=ns99996378> (last visited August 23, 2005).