QuickJ., “Maintaining the Integrity of the Clinical Evidence Base,”Bull World Health Organization79, no.12 (2001): At 1093.
2.
PhRMA, 2004Pharmaceutical Industry Profile, Washington DC: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (2004).
3.
BeginM.ErolaJ.WellsG.PotworoskiJ., Accelerating Access for Patients to Best Medicine: The System and the Challenge (Ottawa: University of Ottawa, 2002).
4.
BodenheimerT., “Uneasy Alliance – Clinical Investigators and the Pharmaceutical Industry,”New England Journal of Medicine342, no. 20 (2000): 1539–1544.
5.
BlumenthalD.CampbellE. G.AndersonM. S.CausinoN.LouisK. S., “Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Science: Evidence from a National Survey of Faculty,”Journal of the American Medical Association277, no.15 (1997): 1224–1228.
6.
Bayh-Dole Act, 35 USC 200–212; (1980).
7.
DeAngelisC. D., “Conflict of Interest and the Public Trust,”Journal of the American Medical Association284, no. 7 (2000): At 2237–2238; AngellM., “Is Academic Medicine For Sale?”New England Journal of Medicine342, no. 20 (2000): 1516–1518.
8.
Van Der WeydenM. B., “Confronting Conflict of Interest in Research Organizations: Time for National Action,”Medical Journal of Australia175, no. 8 (2001): 396–397.
9.
ThompsonD. F., “Understanding Financial Conflicts of Interest,”New England Journal of Medicine329, no. 8 (1993): 573–576.
10.
See Thompson, supra note 9.
11.
MartinJ. B.KasperD. L., “In Whose Best Interest? Breaching the Academic-Industrial Wall,”New England Journal of Medicine343, no. 22 (2000): 1646–1649.
12.
LevinskyN. G., “Nonfinancial Conflicts of Interest in Research,”New England Journal of Medicine347, no. 10 (2002): 759–761.
13.
See Thompson, supra note 9.
14.
Task Force on Financial Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research, Protecting Subjects, Preserving Trust, Promoting Progress II: Association of American Medical Colleges, (AAMC: Washington, D.C., 2002).
15.
Task Force on Research and Accountability, Report on Individual and Institutional Financial Conflict of Interest, Washington, DC: Association of American Universities (2001).
16.
JohnsM. M.BarnesM.FlorencioP. S., “Restoring Balance to Industry-Academia Relationships in an Era of Institutional Financial Conflicts of Interest: Promoting Research While Maintaining Trust,”Journal of the American Medical Association289, no. 6 (2003): 741–746.
17.
PressE.WashburnJ., “The Kept University,”Atlantic Monthly285 (2000): At 39–54.
18.
LewisS.BairdP.EvansR. G., “Dancing with the Porcupine: Rules for Governing the University-Industry Relationship,”Canadian Medical Association Journal165, no. 6 (2001): 783–785.
19.
CollierJ.IheanachoI., “The Pharmaceutical Industry as an Informant,”Lancet360no. 9343 (2002): 1405–1409.
20.
See Angell, supra note 7.
21.
OHRP, Financial Relationships in Clinical Research: Issues for Institutions, Clinical Investigators, and IRB's to Consider when Dealing with Issues of Financial Interests and Human Subject Protection, Washington, D.C.: Office of Human Research Protections (2001).
22.
See Martin, supra note 11.
23.
See Press, supra note 17.
24.
See Van Der Weyden, supra note 8.
25.
See Task Force on Financial Conflicts, supra note 14
26.
See Press, Washburn, supra note 17.
27.
CampbellE. G.WeissmanJ. S.ClarridgeB.YucelR.CausinoN.BlumenthalD., “Characteristics of Medical School Faculty Members Serving on Institutional Review Boards: Results of a National Survey”, Academic Medicine78, no. 8, (2003): 831–836.
28.
See JohnsBarnesFloencio, supra note 16.
29.
See OHRP, supra note 21.
30.
DukesM. N., “Accountability of the Pharmaceutical Industry,”Lancet360, no. 9346 (2002): 1682–1684; PecoulB.ChiracP.TrouillerP.PinelJ., Access to Essential Drugs in Poor Countries: A Lost Battle?Journal of the American Medical Association281, no. 4 (1999): 361–367.
31.
AngellM.RelmanA. S., “Prescription for Profit,”Washington Post, June 20, 2001, at A27.
32.
EmanuelE. J.TeinerD., “Institutional Conflict of Interest,”New England Journal of Medicine332, no. 4 (1995): 262–267.
33.
ShalalaD., “Protecting Research Subjects—What Must Be Done,”New England Journal of Medicine343, no.11 (2000): 808–810.
DavidoffF., “Between the Lines: Navigating the Uncharted Territory of Industry- Sponsored Research. A Former Medical Journal Editor Describes How and Why Staff Changed Their Policy on Disclosing Conflicts of Interest,”Health Affairs (Millwood)21, no. 2 (2002): 235–242.
41.
DavidsonR. A., “Source of Funding and Outcome of Clinical Trials,”Journal of General Internal Medicine1, no. 3 (1986): 155–158: FriedbergM.SaffranB.StinsonT. J.NelsonW.BennettC. L., “Evaluation of Conflict of Interest in Economic Analyses of New Drugs Used in Oncology,”Journal of the American Medical Association282, no. 15 (1999): 1453–1457; LexchinJ.BeroL. A.DjulbegovicB.ClarkO., “Pharmaceutical Industry Sponsorship and Research Outcome and Quality: Systematic Review,”British Medical Journal326, no. 7400 (2003): 1167–1170; ChoM. K.BeroL. A., “The Quality of Drug Studies Published in Symposium Proceedings,”Annals of Internal Medicine124, no. 5 (1996): 485–489; BhandariM.BusseJ.W.JackowskiD., “Association between Industry Funding and Statistically Significant Pro-Industry Findings in Medical and Surgical Randomized Trials,”Canadian Medical Association Journal170, no. 4 (2004): 477–480.
42.
BeroL. A.RennieD. Influences on the Quality of Published Drug Studies, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care12, no.2 (1996): 209–237.
43.
See Bero, supra note 42.
44.
SaferD. J., “Design and Reporting Modifications in Industry-Sponsored Comparative Psychopharmacology Trials,”Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease190, no. 9 (2002): 583–592.
45.
RochonP. A.GurwitzJ. H.SimmsR. W., “A Study of Manufacturer-Supported Trials of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in the Treatment of Arthritis,”Archives of Internal Medicine154, no. 2 (1994): 157–163.
RayW. A.GriffinM. R.AvornJ., “Evaluating Drugs after their Approval for Clinical Use,”New England Journal of Medicine329, no. 27 (1993): 2029–2032; see RochonGurwitz, and Simms, supra note 45
48.
MarshallM.LockwoodA.BradleyC.AdamsC.JoyC.FentonM., “Unpublished Rating Scales: A Major Source of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Treatments for Schizophrenia,”British Journal of Psychiatry176 (2000): 249–252.
49.
CarpenterW., “Industry Phase IV Trials are of Little or No Value: Pro,”Journal of Psychotic Disorders5, no. 4 (2001): At 3 and 13.
50.
TrivediM. H.RushA. J.CarmodyT. J., “Do Bupropion SR and Sertraline Differ in their Effects on Anxiety in Depressed Patients?”Journal of Clinical Psychiatry62, no. 10 (2001): 776–781; CarpenterW. T.Jr.“From clinical trial to prescription,”Archives of General Psychiatry59, no. 3 (2002): 282–285.
51.
See Safer, supra note 44.
52.
LauritsenK.HavelundT.LaursenL. S.Rask-MadsenJ., “Withholding Unfavorable Results in Drug Company Sponsored Clinical Trials,”Lancet1, no. 8541(1987): At 1091.
53.
See RayGriffin, supra note 47; PsatyB. M.WeissN. S.FurbergC. D., “Surrogate End Points, Health Outcomes, and the Drug-Approval Process for the Treatment of Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease,”Journal of the American Medical Association282, no. 8 (1999): 786–790.
54.
KahnJ. O.CherngD. W.MayerK.MurrayH.LagakosS., “Evaluation of HIV-1 Immunogen, an Immunologic Modifier, Administered to Patients Infected with HIV Having 300 to 549 × 10(6)/4L CD4 Cell Counts: A randomized Controlled Trial,”Journal of the American Medical Association284, no.17 (2000): 2193–2202.
55.
EmanuelE. J.WendlerD.GradyC., “What Makes Clinical Research Ethical?”Journal of the American Medical Association283, no. 20 (2000): 2701–2711.
56.
Editorial, “A Duty to Publish,”Nature Medicine (1998); 4(10): At 1089; MunroA.J., “Publishing the Findings of Clinical Research,”British Medical Journal307, no. 6915 (1993): 1340–1341.
57.
RosenbergS. A., “Secrecy in Medical Research,”New England Journal of Medicine334, no. 6 (1996): 392–394; NadisS., “US Concern Grows Over Secrecy Clauses,”Nature398, no.6726 (1999): At 359.
58.
ChalmersI., “Underreporting Research is Scientific Misconduct,”Journal of the American Medical Association263, no. 10 (1990): 1405–1408.
59.
See Lexchin, supra note 41.
60.
RennieD., “Thyroid storm,”Journal of the American Medical Association277, no. 15 (1997): 1238–1243; See BlumenthalChampbellAndersonCausinoLouis, supra note 5.
61.
See Chalmers, supra note 58.
62.
KelchR. P., “Maintaining the Public Trust in Clinical Research,”New England Journal of Medicine346, no. 4 (2002): 285–287.
63.
See Bodenheimer, supra note 4.
64.
See BlumenthalChampbellAndersonCausinoLouis, supra note 5.
65.
SimonsenR. J., “Corporate-Sponsored Research Contracts—an Ethical Minefield,”Quintessence International27, no. 7 (1996): At 443; See Rennie, supra note 60.
66.
PhillipsR. A.HoeyJ., “Constraints of Interest: Lessons at the Hospital for Sick Children,”Canadian Medical Association159, no. 8 (1998): 955–957.
67.
ThompsonJ.BairdP.DownieJ., Report of the Committee of Inquiry on the Case Involving Dr. Nancy Olivieri, the Hospital for Sick Children, the University of Toronto, and Apotex Inc. (Toronto: Canadian Association of University Teachers, 2001).
68.
See AngelisDe, supra note 7.
69.
See Task Force on Financial Conflicts, supra note 14.
70.
FinkelM. J., “Should Informed Consent Include Information on How Research is Funded?”Institutional Review Board13, no. 5 (1991): 1–3.
71.
ChauretteK.JedreyC., “Managing Conflicts of Interest in Human Subjects Research,”Medical Research Law & Policy Report1, no. 14 (2002): 441–445.
72.
McCraryS. V.AndersonC. B.JakovljevicJ., “A National Survey of Policies on Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research,”New England Journal of Medicine343, no. 22 (2000): 1621–1626.
73.
LoB.WolfL. E.BerkeleyA., “Conflict-of-interest Policies for Investigators in Clinical Trials,”New England Journal of Medicine343, no. 22 (2000): 1616–1620.
74.
See OHRP, supra note 21.
75.
See Task Force on Financial Conflicts, supra note 14
76.
See OHRP, supra note 21.
77.
See Task Force on Research, supra note 15.
78.
See Task Force on Financial Conflicts, supra note 14.
79.
See Task Force on Financial Conflicts, supra note 14.
80.
See EmanuelSteiner, supra note 32.
81.
See OHRP, supra note 21.
82.
See, ChauretteJedrey, supra note 71.
83.
See Task Force on Financial Conflicts, supra note 14; See Task Force on Research, supra note 15.
84.
van GijnJ., “The Scribe of Stroke Trials,”European Neurology49, no. 2 (2003): 125–127; LeesK. R.OrgogozoJ. M., “Acute Stroke: Trial by Jury. The Toothless Tiger (role of the principal investigator)”European Neurology49, no. 2 (2003): 120–124.
85.
MorseM. A.CaliffR. M.SugarmanJ., “Monitoring and Ensuring Safety during Clinical Research,”Journal of the American Medical Association285, no. 9 (2001): 1201–1205; SlutskyA. S.LaveryJ. V., “Data Safety and Monitoring Boards,”New England Journal Medicine350, no. 11 (2004): 1143–1147
86.
See Task Force on Financial Conflicts, supra note 14.
87.
See OHRP, supra note 21.
88.
American Association of Medical Colleges, Clinical Trial Contracts: A Discussion of Four Selected Provisions, Washington, DC (2004); DuValG., “Institutional Ethics Review of Clinical Study Agreements,”Journal of Medical Ethics30, no. 1 (2004): 30–34.