MacklinR., “After Helsinki: Unresolved Issues in International Research,”Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal11, no. 1 (2001): 17–36.
2.
In scientific cultures awareness of alternatives is highly developed and challenges to established knowledge are welcomed. In traditional cultures there is no developed awareness of alternatives to the established body of theoretical tenets and any challenge to established knowledge is a threat of chaos and invokes intense anxiety. There is also a difference in magical versus non-magical attitude to words. In non-scientific cultures words have power to influence events. Knowing the name of a being or thing is to have some degree of control over it. The scientific attitude to words is quite different and words and reality are independent variables. HortonR., “African Traditional Thought and Western Science,” in MoselyA. ed., African Philosophy (Englewood Cliffs: New Jersey Prentice Hall, 1995): 310–338.
3.
MacklinR., Against Relativism: Cultural Diversity and the Search for Ethical Universals in Medicine (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999); BeauchampT.L., “A Defense of the Common Morality,”Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal13, no. 3 (2003): 259–274; TurnerL., “Zones of Consensus and Zones of Conflict: Questioning the ‘Common Morality’ Presumption in Bioethics,”Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal13, no. 3 (2003): 193–218; DeGraziaD., “Common Morality, Coherence, and the Principles of Biomedical Ethics,”Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal13, no. 3 (2003): 219–230; Internet Philosophical Sources on Moral Relativism, at <http://ethics.sandiego.edu/theories/Relativism> (last visited Aug. 27, 2004).
4.
FoxR. and SwazyJ., “Medical Morality is Not Bioethics – Medical Ethics in China and the United States,”Perspectives in Biology and Medicine27 (1985): 337–360; LiebanR.W., “Medical Anthropology and the Comparative Study of Medical Ethics,” in WeiszG.W., eds., Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics (Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer, 1990): 221–239; ChristakisN.A., “Ethics are Local: Engaging Cross-Cultural Variations in the Ethics for Clinical Research,”Social Science and Medicine35, no. 9 (1992): 1079–91; HoffmeisterB., “Morality and the Social Sciences,” in WeiszG.W., eds., Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics (Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer, 1990): 241–260; BowmanK., “Bioethics and Cultural Pluralism,”Humane Health Care International13, no. 2 (1997): 31–34; BergerJ.T., “Culture and Ethnicity in Clinical Care,”Archives of Internal Medicine158, no. 19 (1998): 2085–2090; MarshallP.A., “Anthropology and Bioethics,”Medical Anthropology Quarterly6, no. 1 (1992): 49–73.
5.
TangwaG., “The Traditional African Perception of a Person: Some Implications for Bioethics,”Hastings Center Report30, no. 5 (2000): 39–43.
6.
TangwaG., “International Regulations and Medical Research in Developing Countries: Double Standards or Differing Standards?”Notizie di Politeia, XVIII67 (2002): 46–50; LoueS.OkelloD., and KawamaM, “Research Bioethics in the Ugandan Context,”Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics24 (1986): 47–53; NairnT., “The Use of Zairian Children in HIV Vaccine Experimentation: A Cross-cultural Study in Medical Ethics,” in LammersS. and VerheyA. eds., On Moral Medicine, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing, 1998): 919–931.
7.
DouglasM.ThompsonM., and VerweijM., “Is Time Running Out? The Case of Global Warming,”Daedalus (2003): 98–107.
8.
Id.
9.
SchwartzB., “A Pluralist Model of Culture,”Contemporary Sociology20 (1991): 764–66.
10.
SugarmanJ. and SulmasyD. P., eds., Methods in Medical Ethics (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2001).
11.
BeauchampT.L. and ChildressJ., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).
12.
Mackling supra note 3.
13.
LondonA. J., “The Ambiguity and the Exigency: Clarifying ‘Standard of Care’ Arguments in International Research,”Journal of Medicine and Philosophy25, no. 4 (2000): 379–97.
14.
FreedmanB., “Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical Research,”New England Journal of Medicine217 (1987): 141–145.
15.
SmartN., Worldviews: Cross-cultural Explorations of Human Beliefs, 2nd ed. (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1995).
16.
KungH., Global Responsibility: In Search of a New World Ethic (New York: Continuum, 1993).
17.
NussbaumM.C., Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education (Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1997).
18.
GloverJ., Humanity: A Moral History of the 20th Century (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001).
19.
Macklin, supra note 1.
20.
GutmannA., “Introduction” in Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition (Princeton: Princeton University Press1994); GutmannA. and ThompsonD., Why Deliberative Democracy? (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).
21.
GarattiniS.de Andres-TrellesF.BerteleV., and Li BassiL., “Ethics of Testing Drugs with Readily Available Alternatives,”Lancet360 (2002): 647.
22.
While the research endeavor is not directly responsible for such disparities, those involved in research are indirectly co-opted into a global political economy that has profoundly adverse implications for health. As such researchers have an obligation not to contribute to aggravating disparities, but rather to assist in narrowing them.
23.
A lengthy patient information/informed consent form containing detailed information about investigations and procedures that does not provide information about poor prognosis (for examples in trials of new drugs for metastatic carcinoma where median survival is often very short and minimal prolongation of life is anticipated with new treatments) and no indication of what ‘response’ to ‘active’ drugs means in terms of prolongation of life or improvement in quality of life, can hardly be considered a universal standard. GostinL., “Informed Consent, Cultural Sensitivity, and respect for Persons,”JAMA274, no 10 (1995): 844–5; MarshallP.A., “The Relevance of Culture for Informed Consent in U.S.- Funded International Health Research: Findings and Recommendations from the Case Study on Informed Consent for Genetic Epidemiological Studies of Hypertension, Breast Cancer, and Diabetes Mellitus in Nigeria,”Commissioned Paper for National Bioethics Advisory Commission: Ethical and Policy Issues in International Research: Clinical Trials in Developing CountriesVol. II (May 2001): C1–C38; LindeggerG. and RichterL., “HIV Vaccine Trials: Critical Issues in Informed Consent,”South African Journal of Science96 (2000): 313–17.
24.
“Moral Standards for Research in Developing Countries: From ‘Reasonable Availability’ to ‘Fair Benefits’,”Hastings Center Report34 (2004): 17–27; BelskyL. and RichardsonH.S., “Medical Researchers' Ancillary Care Responsibilities,”British Medical Journal328 (2004): 1494–6.
25.
CostelloA. and ZumlaA., “Moving to Research Partnerships in Developing Countries,”British Medical Journal321 (2000): 827–829; LoB. and BayerR., “Establishing Ethical Trials for Treatment and Prevention of AIDS in Developing Countries,”British Medical Journal327 (2003): 337–339.
26.
BenatarS.R. and SingerP.A., “A New Look at International Research Ethics,”British Medical Journal321 (2000): 824–26.
27.
ShapiroK. and BenatarS.R., “HIV Prevention Research and Global Inequality: Steps Towards Improved Standards of Care”Journal of Medical Ethics (2004) In press.
28.
BenatarS.R., “Some Reflections and Recommendations on Research Ethics in Developing Countries,”Social Science & Medicine54, no. 7 (2002): 1131–41, 1147–48.