CampbellC., “Ethics in the Twilight Zone,”Hastings Center Report33, no. 2 (2003): 44–46, at 44.
2.
ZussmanR., “The Contributions of Sociology to Medical Ethics,”Hastings Center Report30, no. 1 (2000): 7–11, at 7.
3.
FoxR.SwazeyJ., “Medical Morality is not Bioethics — Medical Ethics in China and the United States,”Perspectives in Biology and Medicine21 (1984): 336–360, at 337–338 and 360.
4.
GuilleminJ., “Bioethics and the Coming of the Corporation to Medicine,” in De VriesR.SubediJ., eds., Bioethics and Society (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998): 60–77, at 62.
5.
ChamblissD., Beyond Caring: Hospitals, Nurses, and the Social Organization of Ethics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), at 92–93.
6.
ImberJ., “Medical Publicity before Bioethics: Nineteenth Century Illustrations of Twentieth Century Dilemmas,” in De VriesR.SubediJ., eds., Bioethics and Society (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998): 16–37, at 30.
7.
BoskC., “Now that We Have the Data, What Was the Question',”American Journal of Bioethics2no. 4 (2002): 21–23, at 21 and 22.
8.
This attitude toward sociologists' evaluations of bioethics is compounded by the confusion of their work with less scholarly, more polemical, and ideologically driven evaluations of bioethics like those offered by SmithWesley J., Culture of Death: The Assault on Medical Ethics in America (San Francisco: †Encounter Books, 2000).
9.
GorovitzS., “Baiting Bioethicits,”Ethics96 (1986): 356–374, at 365.
10.
de WachterM., “Sociology and Bioethics in the U.S.A.,”Hastings Center Report28, no. 5 (1998): 40–42. Other disciplines — most notably medical humanities — are critical of bioethics, but in most cases these criticisms look more like internecine struggles for control of the profession.
11.
ChambersT., “Centering Bioethics,”Hastings Center Report30, no. 1 (2000): 22–29.
12.
Philosophers are critical of bioethics (see, for example, MarinoG., “Avoiding Moral Choices,”Commonweal, March 23, 2001: 11–15), but their work does not seem to arouse the ire of bioethicists.
13.
LockM., “Situated Ethics, Culture, and the Brain Death Problem in Japan,” in HoffmasterB., ed., Bioethics in a Social Context (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2001): 39–68.
14.
BlackhallL.MurphyS.FrankG.MichelV.AzenS., “Ethnicity and Attitudes Toward Patient Autonomy,”JAMA274 (1995): 820–825; CarreseJ.RhodesL., “Western Bioethics on the Navajo Reservation. Benefit or Harm?”JAMA274 (1995): 826–829; PressN.BrownerC., “Risk, Autonomy, and Responsibility: Informed Consent for Prenatal Testing,”Hastings Center Report25, no. 3 (1995): S9–S12; RappR. “Accounting for Amniocentesis,” in LindenbaumS.LockM., eds., The Anthropology of Medicine and Everyday Life (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993); MarshallP., “A Contextual Approach to Clinical Ethics Consultation,” in HoffmasterB., ed., Bioethics in a Social Context (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2001): 137–152.
15.
AnspachR., Deciding Who Lives: Fateful Choices in the Intensive Care Nursery (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993); ZussmanR., Intensive Care: Medical Ethics and the Medical Profession (University of Chicago Press, 1992); MesmanJ., Evaren Pioniers: Omgaan met twijfel in de intensive care voor pasgeborenen [Experienced Pioneers: An Ethnography of the Intensive Care Unit for Newborns], (Amsterdam: Aksant, 2002).
16.
This is not to assert the superiority of one approach over another. I simply note that the different traditions of anthropology and sociology incline us to ask different questions.
17.
JonesN., “Validity and Applicability of the Social Sciences to and for Bioethics,”American Journal of Bioethics3, no. 3 (2003); 33–34, at 34.
18.
De VriesR.SubediJ., “Preface,” in De VriesR.SubediJ., eds., Bioethics and Society (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998): xi–xix, at xvii.
19.
DurkheimE., The Division of Labor in Society (New York: Free Press, 1933). I am not the first to reflect in the relationship between sociology and bioethics. For other efforts see, BoskC., “Professional Ethicist Available: Logical, Secular, Friendly,”Daedalus128, no. 4 (1999):47–68; ZussmanR., “The Contributions of Sociology to Medical Ethics,”Hastings Center Report30, no. 1 (2000): 7–11; EvansJ., “A Sociological Account of the Growth of Principlism,”Hastings Center Report30, no. 5 (2000): 31–38.
20.
ParsonsT., The Social System (Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1951): 428–479.
21.
MertonR.ReaderG. G.KendallP. L., The Student-Physician: Introductory Studies in the Sociology of Medical Education (Cambridge,. MA: Harvard University Press, 1957); BeckerH., Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961).
22.
SudnowD., Passing On: The Social Organization of Dying (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1967); GlaserB. G.StraussA. L., Time for Dying (Chicago: Aldine, 1968).
23.
FreidsonE., The Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge(New York: Dodd, Mead, 1970).
24.
GoffmanE., Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1963); E. Goffman, Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates (Chicago: Aldine, 1961).
25.
ConradP.SchneiderJ., Deviance and Medicalization: From Badness to Sickness (St Louis: Mosby, 1980).
26.
BarberB., Research on Human Subjects: Problems of Social Control in Medical Experimentation (New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1973).
27.
GrayB., Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation: A Sociological Study of the Conduct and Regulation of Clinical Research (New York: Wiley, 1975).
28.
BoskC., Forgive and Remember: Managing Medical Failure (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979).
29.
BoskC., Forgive and Remember: Managing Medical Failure, second edition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003): 246–247.
30.
FoxR., Experiment Perilous (Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1959); FoxR.SwazeyJ., The Courage to Fail (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974).
31.
DavisF., “The Courage to Fail,” (book review) The American Journal of Sociology81 (1975): 417–420, at 420.
32.
FoxR.SwazeyJ., Spare parts: Organ Replacement in American Society (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992): 210.
33.
RothmanD., Strangers at the Bedside: How Law and Bioethics Transformed Medical Decision Making (New York: Basic Books, 1991).
34.
See Zussman, supra note 15.
35.
BoskC., All God's Mistakes: Genetic Counseling in a Pediatric Hospital (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).
36.
See MesmanJ.AnspachR., supra note 15; GuilleminJ.HolmstromL., Mixed Blessings: Intensive Care for Newborns (New York: Oxford, 1986).
37.
See Chambliss, supra note 5.
38.
EvansJ., Playing God: Human Genetic Engineering and the Rationalization of Public Bioethical Debate (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002). See also EvansJ., “A Sociological Account of the Growth of Principlism,”Hastings Center Report30, no. 5 (2000): 31–38.
39.
De VriesR.SubediJ., eds., Bioethics and Society (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998); HoffmasterB., ed., Bioethics in a Social Context (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2001).
40.
BoskC., “Professional Expertise and Moral Cowardice: ‘Counterfeit Courage’ and the ‘Non-Combatant,’”Paper delivered at the School of Social Science, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ, 29 October 2004.
41.
See De VriesSubedi, supra note 18, at xiv.
42.
This story is not unique: Other social scientists have described the delays and stonewalling they faced in their attempts to get IRB approval of research on IRBs. See CasperM., The Making of the Unborn Patient (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1998).
43.
StrausR., “The Nature and Status of Medical Sociology,”American Sociological Review22 (1957): 200–204, at 203, 204.
44.
BergerP., Invitation to Sociology (Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1963).
45.
MillsC. W., The Sociological Imagination (New York: Oxford, 1959).
46.
DoukasD.FettersM.CoyneJ.McCulloughL., “How Men View Genetic Testing for Prostate Cancer Risk: Findings from Focus Groups,”Clinical Genetics58 (2000): 169–176.
47.
FettersM.DoukasD.PhanK., “Family Physicians' Perspectives on Genetics and the Human Genome Project”, Clinical Genetics56 (1999): 28–34.
48.
See Blackhall, supra note 14.
49.
See CarreseRhodes, supra note 14. Leigh Turner offers a thorough review of similar studies, which he sees as an “anthropological turn” in bioethics. See TurnerL., “Bioethics in a Multicultural World: Medicine and Morality in Pluralistic Settings,”Health Care Analysis11, no. 2 (2003): 99–117.
50.
BellJ.WhitonJ.ConnellyS., Final Report: Evaluation of NIH Implementation of Section 491 of the Public Health Service Act, Mandating a Program of Protection for Research Subjects (1998). Available at: <http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/hsp_report/hsp_final_rpt.pdf> (last visited March 12, 2004).
51.
DeVriesR.ForsbergC., “What do IRBs Look Like, What Kind of Support Do They Receive?”Accountability in Research9 (2002): 199–216, at 213.
52.
GoldmanJ.KatzM., “Inconsistency and Institutional Review Boards,”JAMA248 (1982): 197–202.
53.
HardingT.UmmelM., “Evaluating the Work of Ethical Review Committees: An Observation and a Suggestion,”Journal of Medical Ethics15 (1989): 191–194.
54.
HarriesU.FentemPTuxworthW., “Local Research Ethics Committees: Widely Differing Responses to a National Survey Protocol,”Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London28 (1994): 150–154; FosterC., “Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree with Each Other?”Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London29 (1995): 315–318; GarfieldP., “Cross-district Comparisons of Applications to Research Ethics Committees,”British Medical Journal311 (1995): 660–661; Dal RéR.EspadaJ.OrtegaR., “Performance of Research Ethics Committees in Spain,”Journal of Medical Ethics25 (1999): 268–273; SilvermanH.HullS.SugarmanJ., “Variability Among Institutional Review Boards' Decisions within the Context of a Multi-Center Trial,”Critical Care Medicine29 (2001): 235–241.
55.
StairT.ReedC.RadeosM., “Variation in Institutional Review Board Responses to a Standard Protocol for a Multicenter Trial,”Academic Emergency Medicine8 (2001): 636–641.
56.
GoldsteinA.FrasierP.CurtisA., “Consent Form Readability in University-Sponsored Research,”Journal of Family Practice42 (1996): 606–11.
57.
See Silverman, supra note 54.
58.
CorriganO., “Empty Ethics: The Problem with Informed Consent,”Sociology of Health and Illness25 (2003): 768–92.
59.
ChoM.ShoharaR.SchisselA.DrummondR., “Policies on Faculty Conflicts of Interest at US Universities,”JAMA284 (2000): 2203–2208.
60.
SchulmanK.SeilsD.TimbieJ.SugarmanJ.DameL.WeinfurtK.MarkD.CaliffR., “A National Survey of Provisions in Clinical-Trial Agreements between Medical Schools and Industry Sponsors,”N. Engl. J. Med. 347 (2002): 1335–1341.
61.
SchniedermanL.GlimerT.TeetzelH., “Effects of Ethics Consultations on Non-beneficial Life Sustaining Treatments in the Intensive Care Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial,”JAMA290 (2003): 1166–1172.
62.
MolewijkA.StiggelboutA.OttenW.DupuisH.KievitJ., “Implicit Normativity in Evidence-Based Medicine: A Plea for Integrated Empirical Ethics Research,”Health Care Analysis11 (2003); 69–92, at 70.
63.
BergM.MolA., eds., Ingebouwde Normen [Built-in Norms] (Utrecht, The Netherlands: Van Der Wees, 2001). See also BergM.ter MeulenR.van den BurgM., “Guidelines for Appropriate Care: The Importance of Empirical Normative Analysis,”Health Care Analysis9 (2001): 77–99.
64.
See Molewijk, supra note 62 at 70–71.
65.
See Molewijk, supra note 62 at 69.
66.
MolA., “Wat Dianogtische Technieken Doen: Het Voorbeeld van De Bloedsuikermeter,” [What Diagnostic Techniques Do: The Example of the Blood Sugar Meter] in BergM.MolA., eds., Ingebouwde Normen [Built-in Norms] (Utrecht, The Netherlands: Van Der Wees, 2001): 143–157, at 154–156.
ElliottC., “Diary: The Ethics of Bioethics,”London Review of Books24, no. 23 (2002), 40.
71.
For examples of OHRP oversight of human subjects protection programs see “OHRP Compliance Activities: Determination Letters” at <http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/detrm_letrs/lindex.htm> (last visited March 9, 2004).
72.
See the section, “Consequences of moral-advice giving.”
73.
45 C.F.R. §46.107 (1991)
74.
The Netherlands, Wet Medisch-Wetenschappelijk Onaerzoek Met Mensen [Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act], Section 16.
75.
De VriesR., “Book Review — T. Stevens, ‘Bioethics in America: Origins and Cultural Politics,’”Journal of American History89 (2002): 316–318, at 318.
76.
BrodyB.DublerN.BlusteinJ.CaplanA.KahnJ.KassN.LoB.MorenoJ.SugarmanJ.ZolothL., “Bioethics Consultation in the Private Sector,”The Hastings Center Report32, no. 3 (2002): 14–20.
77.
MorenoJ., “Neuroethics: An Agenda for Neuroscience and Society,”Nature Reviews Neuroscience4 (2003): 149–153.
78.
MilesS., “Deaths Between Bedrails and Air Pressure Mattresses,”Journal of the American Geriatrics Society50 (2002): 1124–1125.
79.
ElliottC., “A New Way to be Mad,”The Atlantic Monthly286, no. 6 (2000), 72–74, 76+.