U.S. Food and Drug Administration, PHS Guideline on Infectious Disease Issues in Xenotransplantation, at <http://www.fda.gov/cber/gdlns/xenophs0101.htm> (last visited January 21, 2004).
2.
ChapmanL.E., “Xenotransplantation and Xenogeneic Infections,”N. Engl. J. Med. 333 (1995): 1498–1501;
3.
MurphyF.A., “The Public Health Risk of Animal Organ and Tissue Transplantation Into Humans,”Science273 (1996): 746–47;
4.
AllanJ.S., “Xenotransplantation at a Crossroads: Prevention Versus Progress,”Nature Medicine2 (1996): 1996–18;
5.
FishmanJ.A., “Infection and Xenotransplantation: Developing Strategies to Minimize Risk,”Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences862 (1998): 1998–52;
6.
WeissR.A., “Xenografts and Retroviruses,”Science285 (1999): 1999–1221;
7.
AllenJ.S., “Understanding Xenotransplantation Risks from Nonhuman Primate Retroviruses,”Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology278 ((2003): 101–123.
8.
Id. See also, ButlerD., “Last Chance to Stop and Think on Risks of Xenotransplantation,”Nature391 (1998): 320–24;
The public health risks associated with xenotransplantation are also reviewed in FlorencioP.S.RamanathanE.D., “Are Xenotransplantation Safeguards Legally Viable?,”Berkeley Technology Law Journal16: Suppl. (2001): 937–77.
11.
MorseS.S.SchluederbergA., “Emerging Viruses: The Evolution of Viruses and Viral Diseases,”Journal of Infectious Diseases264 (1990): 1–7;
12.
GibbonsA., “Where are New Diseases Born?,”Science261 ((1993): 68–70.
13.
TaubenbergerJ.K., “Initial Genetic Characterization of the 1918 Spanish’ Influenza Virus,”Science275 (1997): 1793–96.
14.
BaerG.M.TordoN., “Rabies Virus,” in WebsterR.G.GranoffA., eds., Encyclopedia of Virology(San Diego: Academic Press, 1994): 1180–85.
15.
NikiforukA., The Fourth Horseman: A Short History of Plagues, Scourges and Emerging Viruses (Toronto: Penguin Books, 1996): At 27.
16.
HolmesG.P., “Lassa Fever in the United States: Investigation of a New Case and Guidelines for Management,”N. Engl. J. Med. 323 (1990): 1120–23;
17.
SureshV., “The Enigmatic Haemorrhagic Fevers,”Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine90 (1997): 622–24.
18.
LevineJ.F.WilsonM.L.SpielmanA., “Mice as Reservoirs of the Lyme Disease Spirochete,”American Journal of Tropical Medical Hygiene34 (1985): 355–60;
19.
MatuschkaF.R., “Capacity of European Animals as Reservoir Hosts for the Lyme Disease Spirochete,”Journal of Infectious Diseases165 (1992): 1992–479;
20.
KaiserJ., “Of Mice and Moths — and Lyme Disease?,”Science279 ((1998): 984–85.
21.
FranchiniG.BoschM.L., “Genetic Relatedness of the Human Immunodeficiency Viruses Type 1 and 2 (HTV-1, HIV-2) and the Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV),”Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences554 (1989): 81–87;
22.
GaoF., “Human Infection by Genetically Diverse SIVSM-related HIV-2 in West Africa,”Nature358 ((1992): 495–99.
23.
OldstoneM.B.A., Viruses, Plagues, and History (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998): At 46.
24.
SteadW.W., “The Origin and Erratic Global Spread of Tuberculosis: How the Past Explains the Present and is the Key to the Future,”Clinical Chest Medicine18, no. 1 (1997): 65–77.
25.
PoieszB.J., “Detection of Type C Retrovirus Particles From Fresh and Cultured Lymphocytes of a Patient with T-Cell Lymphoma,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A.77 (1980): 7415–19;
26.
KoralnikI.J., “Phylogenetic Associations of Human and Simian T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphotropic Virus Type 1 Strains: Evidence For Interspecies Transmission,”Journal of Virology68 ((1994): 2693–2707.
27.
Chapman, supra note 2, at 1499.
28.
HughesJ.M., “Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome: An Emerging Infectious Disease,”Science262 (1993): 850–51;
29.
MorseS.S., Emerging Viruses (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).
30.
McNeillW.H., Plagues and Peoples (New York: Anchor Press, 1976);
31.
MimsC.A., “The Origin of Major Human Infections and the Crucial Role of Person-to-Person Spread,”Epidemiology & Infection106 ((1991): 423–33.
32.
McClureM.A., “Sequence Comparisons of Retroviral Proteins: Relative Rates of Change and General Phylogeny,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A.85 (1988): 2469–73.
33.
ScholtissekC.RohdeW.von HoyningenV., “On the Origin of the Human Influenza Virus Subtypes H2N2 and H3N3,”Virology87 (1978): 13–20.
34.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, PHS Guideline on Infectious Disease Issues in Xenotransplantation, at <http://www.fda.gov/cber/gdlns/xenophs0101.htm> (last visited January 21, 2004);
United Kingdom Xenotransplantation Interim Regulatory Authority (UKXIRA), Draft Report of the Infection Surveillance Steering Group of the UKXIRA, at <http://www.doh.gov.uk/pub/docs/doh/surveil.pdf> (last visited January 21, 2004).
37.
SolomonD.R.FergusonR.M.HeldermanJ.H., “Xenotransplants: Proceed With Caution,”Nature392 (1998): 11;
38.
StarlzT.E., “Will Xenotransplantation Ever Be Feasible?,”Journal of the American College of Surgeons186 (1998): 383;
39.
SachsD.H., “Xenotransplantation — Caution, But No Moratorium,”Nature Medicine4 (1998): 372;
VogelG., “No Moratorium on Clinical Trials,”Science279 (1998): 648.
42.
GouldS.J., Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life (New York: The Library of Contemporary Thought, 1999): At5–6.
43.
FlorencioP.S.CaulfieldT, “Xenotransplantation and Public Health: Identifying the Legal Issues,”Canadian Journal of Public Health90 (1999): 282–84;
44.
CaulfieldT.A.RobertsonG.B., “Xenotransplantation: Consent, Public Health and Charter Issues,”Medical Law International5 ((2001): 81–99.
45.
DaarA.S., “Ethics of Xenotransplantation: Animal Issues, Consent, and Likely Transformation of Transplant Ethics,”World Journal of Surgery21 (1997): 975–82;
46.
BachF., “Uncertainty in Xenotransplantation: Individual Benefit Versus Collective Risk,”Nature Medicine4 (1998): 1998–141;
47.
CooperD.K.C.LanzaR.P., Xeno: The Promise of Transplanting Animal Organs Into Humans (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000): At 218.
48.
Supra note 1.
49.
Id.
50.
Id.
51.
Id.
52.
FlorencioRamanathan, supra note 3.
53.
BeauchampT.L.ChildressJ.F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994): At 120;
54.
PicardE.I.RobertsonG.B., Legal Liability of Doctors and Hospitals in Canada, 3rd ed. (Scarborough: Carswell, 1996): At11O.
55.
Ciarlariello v. Schacter [1993] 2 S.C.R. 119 (Can.);
56.
Reihl v. Hughes [1980] 2 S.C.R. 880 (Can.);
57.
Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees, 317 P.2d 170 (Cal. 1957);
58.
Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772 (D.C. Cir. 1972).
Dunbar-JacobJ., “Adherence in Chronic Disease,”Annual Review of Nursing Research18 (2000): 48–90.
78.
Laederach-HofmannK., “Noncompliance in Organ Transplant Recipients: A Literature Review,”General Hospital Psychiatry22, no. 6 (2000): 412–24.
79.
BallC.A.BarnesM., “Public Health and Individual Rights: Tuberculosis Control and Detention Procedures in New York City,”Yale Law & Policy Review12, no. 1 (1994): 38–67.
Regarding the need for federal legislation, see FlorencioRamanathan, supra note 3 at 953–63.
82.
United States v. Estate of Romani, 523U.S.517 (1998).
83.
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedomsch. 11, §§ 7-& 8
84.
U.S. Constitution, Amendment IV (the “Search and Seizure Clause”); U.S. Constitution, AmendmentXIV (the “Due Process Clause”).
85.
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, ch. 11, § 15
86.
U.S. Constitution, Amendment XIV (the “Equal Protection Clause”).
87.
FlorencioRamanathan, supra note 3, at 963–75.
88.
Id.
89.
Id.
90.
Bach, supra note 23
91.
SomervilleM., The Ethical Canary: Science, Society and the Human Spirit (Toronto: Penguin, 2000): At 104.
92.
In addition to the issue of how to assure that societal consent is informed, other issues needing further erudition include how to effectively disseminate information to the public (e.g., mailed information packages, televised debate); how to collect consent (e.g., referendum, online polls); quorum requirement — what percentage of a nation's citizenry must vote for the societal consent or refusal to be considered effective and binding (e.g., 15%; 30%; 50%); level of consent required (e.g., regular majority; two thirds majority); scope of the research to which consent is being provided (e.g., cell and tissue xenotransplantation, whole organ xenotransplantation); effect of societal refusal (i.e., particularly in countries already engaged in clinical trials of cell and tissue xenotransplantation).
93.
DefoeD., A Journal of the Plague Year (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990): At 35–36.