For an empirical examination of this view, see WilenskyH.L., The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures (Berkeley, University of California Press): xi–xvi. et passim.; for a more theoretical statement, see DahrendorfR., Life Chances. Approaches to Social and Political Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979).
6.
MarmorT.R., The Politics of Medicare (Chicago: Aldine, 1973): 20–23.
7.
PearR., “Frist Expects Congress to Try to Expand Health Coverage,”New York Times, February 7, 2004, 7:5.
8.
2004 Annual Report of the Boards of Trustees of the Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplemental Insurance Trust Funds (Washington: March 23, 2004): 22–31.
9.
Id.
10.
See “The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2005–2014,” by Holtz-EakinD. Director, Congressional Budget Office, before the Committee on the Budget, U.S. House of Representatives, January 27, 2004, at <http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=4988&sequence=0> (last visited June 30, 2004).
11.
MoonM. and StoreygardM., “Solvency or Affordability? Ways to Measure Medicare's Health,” prepared for the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, March, 2002.
12.
For example, seeWoolhandlerS.CampbellT., and HimmelsteinD.U., “Costs of Health Care Administration in the United States and Canada,”New England Journal of Medicine349 (2003): 768–775.
13.
See Economic Report of the President (Washington: Government Printing Office, 2004): 194ff.
14.
RiceT., The Economics of Health Reconsidered, 2nd ed. (Chicago: Health Administration Press/Academy Health, 2003): 164–166.
15.
CooperB.S. and HowS., “Medicare's Future: Current Picture, Trends, and Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement & Modernization Act of 2003 – Selected Charts,”The Commonwealth Fund, Updated February 24, 2004, at <http://www.cmwf.org/programs/medfutur/medicarechtpk_debate_659-pdf> (last visited June 28, 2004): at 20, author's calculations.
16.
Id., at 22.
17.
Id., at 18.
18.
Id., at 14.
19.
National Academy of Social Insurance, Financing Medicare's Future: Final Report of the Study Panel on Medicare's Long Term Financing — Restructuring Medicare for the Long Term Project (Washington, DC: National Academy of Social Insurance, 2000): at 23 et passim.
20.
CooperB.S. and VladeckB.C., “Perspective: Bringing Competitive Pricing to Medicare,”Health Affairs19, no. 5 (2000): 49–54.
21.
See, for example, the issue of Health Affairs10, no. 4 (1991) — the closest thing the health policy community has to its own L'Osservatore Romano, entitled, “Managed Care: Key to Health Insurance Reform?”.
22.
VobejdaB. and HarrisJ.F., “Democrats Pounce on GOP Medicare Comments,”Washington Post, October 27, 1995 at A4.
23.
See PetersonM.A., “Introduction: Politics, Misperception, or Apropos,”Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law24 (October, 1999): 873–886; the introduction is to a special issue devoted to “The HMO Backlash.”
24.
AaronH.J. and ReischauerR.D., “The Medicare Reform Debate: What Is the Next Step,”Health Affairs14, no. 4 (1995): 8–30.
25.
Oberlander, supra note 2, at 187.
26.
P.L. 108–173, “The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003,” Section 801.