Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
No. 99-1388, 2000 WL 336674 (8th Cir. Mar. 31, 2000 ).
2.
29 U.S.C. § 1144 (1999 ).
3.
See Shea, id. note 1 at *3–6.
4.
107 F.3d 625 (8th Cir. 1997 ).
5.
See Shea, id. note 1 at *1.
6.
The District Court further decided issues of mootness and statute of limitations with respect to the claims in the amended complaint. On appeal, plaintiff's claim was found not to be moot although it did have a statute of limitations bar with respect its claims against the clinic's owners.
7.
519 U.S. 316
8.
See
Shea
, id. note 1 at *3.
9.
See id.
10.
See id. at *4.
11.
See id.
12.
947 F.2d 1341 (8th Cir. 1991 ).
13.
See Shea, id. note 1 at *6.
14.
See id.