See MeiselA., “The Legal Consensus about Forgoing Life-Sustaining Treatment: Its Status and Prospects,”Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 2 (1992): 309–45.
2.
See BlusteinJ., “Choosing for Others as Continuing a Life Story: The Problem of Personal Identity Revisited,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 27 (1999): 20–31.
3.
See, for example, DresserR., “Life, Death, and Incompetent Patients: Conceptual Infirmities and Hidden Values in the Law,”Arizona Law Review, 28 (1986): 379–81; and RobertsonJ., “Second Thoughts on Living Wills,”Hastings Center Report, 21, no. 6 (1991): 6–9.
4.
See DresserR. and WhitehouseP.J., “The Incompetent Patient on the Slippery Slope,”Hastings Center Report, 24, no. 4 (1994): 6–12.
5.
See BuchananA.E. and BrockD.W., Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989).
6.
See DworkinR., Life's Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1993).
7.
See RichB.A., “Prospective Autonomy and Critical Interests: A Narrative Defense of the Moral Authority of Advance Directives,”Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 6 (1997): 138–47.
8.
See KuczewskiM.G., “Whose Will is it Anyway? A Discussion of Advance Directives, Personal Identity, and Consensus in Medical Ethics,”Bioethics, 8, no. 1 (1994): 27–48.
9.
See Blustein, supra note 2, at 28.
10.
See KuczewskiM.G., Fragmentation and Consensus: Communitarian and Casuist Bioethics (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1997).
11.
Blustein, supra note 2, at 23.
12.
See TonelliM.R., “Substituted Judgment in Medical Practice: Evidentiary Standards on a Sliding Scale,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 25 (1997): 22–29.
13.
See TomlinsonT., “An Empirical Study of Proxy Consent for Elderly Persons,”Gerontologist, 30 (1990): 54–64; SecklerA., “Substituted Judgment: How Accurate Are Proxy Predictions?,”Annals of Internal Medicine, 115 (1991): 92–98; and SulmasyD., “More Talk, Less Paper: Predicting the Accuracy of Substituted Judgments,”American Journal of Medicine, 96 (1994): 432–38.
14.
See Buchanan and Brock, supra note 5, at 116.
15.
See ChurchillL.R., “Trust, Autonomy, and Advance Directives,”Journal of Religion and Health, 28 (1989): 175–83; KuczewskiM.G., “Legalistic and Contextual Approaches to Living Wills,”American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Medicine, 91, no. 2 (1992): 78–81; and ForrowL., “The Green Eggs and Ham Phenomena,”Hastings Center Report, 24, no. 6 (1994): S29–S32.
16.
See LevineC. and ZuckermanC., “The Trouble with Families: Toward an Ethic of Accommodation,”Annals of Internal Medicine, 130 (1999): 148–52.
17.
See MinogueB. and ReaganJ.E., “Can Complex Legislation Solve Our End-of-Life Problems?,”Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 3 (1994): 115–24.
18.
See Edna M.F. v. Eisenberg, 563 N.W.2d 485 (Wis. 1997); and Martin v. Martin, 538 N.W2d 399 (Mich. 1995).
19.
See RawlsJ., A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971); and DanielsN., Just Health Care (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985).