RobertsonJ.A.SchneyerT.J., “Professional Self-Regulation and Shared-Risk Programs for In Vitro Fertilization,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 25 (1997): At 285.
2.
Id. at 290.
3.
See id. at 284.
4.
See id.
5.
Id. at MS 286.
6.
See id.
7.
See id. at 287 (citing Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association, Code of Medical Ethics (Chicago: American Medical Association, 1997): At 94–95).
8.
See RobertsonSchneyer, supra note 1, at 286.
9.
RadinM.J., “Market-Inalienability,”Harvard Law Review, 100 (1987): At 1885–86.
10.
See WalzerM., Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books, 1983). WalzerMichael suggests this distributive principle: “No social good x should be distributed to men and women who possess some other good y merely because they possess y and without regard to the meaning of x.” Id. at 20 (original emphasis).
11.
See MurrayT.H., The Worth of a Child (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996).