Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, Confronting AIDS: 1988 Update 1 (1988).
2.
“Tuberculosis in the 1990s: Ethical, Legal, and Public Policy Issues in Screening, Treatment, and the Protection of Those in Congregate Facilities: A Report from the Working Group on TB and HIV,” in United Hospital Fund of New York, The Tuberculosis Revival: Individual Rights and Societal Obligations in a Time of AIDS (1992): 10.
3.
Rothman, “The Sanatorium Experience: Myths and Realities,” in The Tuberculosis Revival: Individual Rights and Societal Obligations in a Time of AIDS, supra note 2, at 73.
4.
National Research Council, Panel on Monitoring the Social Impact of the AIDS Epidemic, The Social Impact of AIDS in the United States (1993).
5.
Hansell, “HIV and the Need for a Voluntarist Approach,”Fordham Urban L.J.19 (1992): 649.
6.
BayerKirp, “The Second Decade of AIDS: The End of Exceptionalism?” in AIDS in the Industrialized Democracies: Passions, Politics and Policies (1992): 361, 365.
7.
New York City Tuberculosis Working Group, Developing a System for TB Prevention and Care in New York City (1992): 2.
8.
BrudneyK.Dobkin, “Resurgent Tuberculosis in New York City: Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Homelessness, and the Decline of Tuberculosis Control Programs,”American Review of Respiratory Disease, 144 (1991): 745, 749.
9.
See, e.g., Martinez v. School Bd., 861 F.2d 1502 (11th Cir. 1988).
10.
GostinLawrence O., “The Future of Public Health Law,”American Journal of Law and Medicine, XII(1986):461, 488—89.
11.
See, e.g. School Bd. v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273, 287 n.16 (1987).