NolanKathleenSwensonSara, “New Tools, New Dilemmas: Genetic Frontiers,”Hastings Center Report (October/November 1988): 40–46.
2.
GellerGailHoltzmanNeil A., “Implications of the Human Genome Initiative for the Primary Care Physician,”Bioethics, 5 (1991): 318–325; see also HoltzmanNeil A., “The Diffusion of New Genetic Tests for Predicting Disease,”FASEB, 6 (1992): 2806–2812.
3.
WertzDorothy C.FletcherJohn J.MulvihillJohn J., “Medical Geneticists Confront Ethical Dilemmas: Cross-Cultural Comparisons Among 18 Nations,”Am J Hum Genet, 46 (1990): 1200–1213; PencarinhaDeborah F.BellNora K.EdwardsJanice G.BestRobert G., “Ethical Issues in Genetic Counseling: A Comparison of M.S. Counselor and Medical Geneticist Perspectives,”J Gen Counsel, 1 (1992): 19–30.
4.
TamborEllen S.ChaseGary A.FadenRuth R.GellerGailHofmanKaren J.HoltzmanNeil A., “The Effect of Improved Response Rates on a Survey of Physicians' Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Genetics,”Am J Pub Health (in press).
5.
Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14, 17 Cal. App. 3d 425, 551 P. 2d 334 (1976).
6.
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Screening and Counseling for Genetic Conditions. Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983; AndrewsLori B., “Legal Aspects of Genetic Information,”Yale J Bio Med, 64 (1991): 29–40.