GervaisKaren and MilesSteven, “RU 486: New Issues in the American Abortion Debate, ”unpublished report from the Center For Biomedical Ethics, University of Minnesota (1990), 9, citing UrquhartD.R. and TempletonA.A., “Acceptability of Medical Pregnancy Termination, ”Lancet, 2 (July 1988): 106.
2.
GrimesDavid, “RU 486: Politics and Science Collide, ”Los Angeles Times, June 17, 1991.
3.
Rust v. Sullivan, 111 S.Ct. 1759 (1991).
4.
GrimesDavid, supra note 2.
5.
CookRebecca, ”Los Angeles Times, June 18, 1991, sec. B7.
6.
CallahanSidney,“The First Stage of Life Is Life,”Los Angeles Times, June 19, 1991.
7.
Ibid.
8.
McFaddenRobert D., “Abortion Mills Thriving Behind Secrecy and Fear, ”New York Times, Nov. 24, 1991, sec. A1.
9.
Gervais and Miles, supra note 1, at 14.
10.
Ibid.
11.
Gervais and Miles, supra note 1, citing Urquhart, at 9.
12.
ToubiaNahidDr., “Between the Concorde and the Horse-Carriage: How Do We Cross the Development Gap with Medical Abortifacients?”unpublished paper presented at the International Symposium on Antiprogestins, Dhaka, Bangladesh, October 7–8, 1991, 10–11.
13.
GrimesDavid, supra note 1, at 15.
14.
KabirSandra and GermainAdrienne, “Is RU 486 Likely to be Appropriate for Women in Bangladesh?”paper presented at the International Symposium on Antiprogestins, Dhaka, Bangladesh, October 7–8, 1991, 12.
