The California Death With Dignity Act. California Civil Code Title 10.5, Initiative.
2.
LarsonEdward, “Washington State: The Nevada of Death?”Seattle Times, October 1991.
3.
BernhoftRobin, M.D. “Should Aid-in-Dying Be Allowed? No.”Seattle Times, October 27, 1991, p. A21.
4.
The proposal was put forward by MeijlerF. I., a cardiologist at the University of Utrecht, in 1984. See GomezCarlos, Regulating Death: Euthanasia and the Case of the Netherlands, New York: Free Press, 1991, p. 96, citing Teresa Takken.
5.
This does not, however, entail that love-sick teenagers have a fundamental right to suicide or that one ought not intervene to prevent the suicide of a person who is depressed. For an extended discussion of how a right to suicide can be fundamental but not entail these conclusions, see my “Suicide: A Fundamental Human Right?” in BattinM. Pabst and MayoDavid J., Suicide: The Philosophical Issues (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1980), pp. 267–285.
6.
Reported in English in van der MaasPaul J.vanDeldenJohannes J.M.PijnenborgLoes and LoomanCaspar W. N., “Euthanasia and Other Medical Decisions Concerning the End of Life,”The Lancet338: 669–74 (September 14, 1991).
7.
Ibid., p. 671.
8.
Public Health and Welfare, 42 section 1395cc(f)(1)(A)(i).
9.
See my brief note, “Suicide Prevention Centres Fail the Elderly,”Current Awareness Bulletin of the Suicide Information and Education Centre (Calgary, Canada) 3:3 (Summer 1988).
10.
For specific recommendations concerning how to conduct such counseling, see my paper “Rational Suicide? How Can We Respond to a Request for Help?” Crisis [Journal of the International Association for Suicide Prevention] 12:2 (1991).
11.
Source: Personal interviews in the Netherlands, September-October 1988; 1989; 1990.